A Large Family outbreak of Keratoconjunctivitis in General Practice: Specific Epidemiological Implications in Family Medicine
Jose Luis Turabian*
Specialist in Family and Community Medicine Health Center “Santa Maria de Benquerencia” Regional Health Service of Castillo La Mancha (SESCAM) Toledo, Spain
*Corresponding author: José Luis Turabián, Regional Health Service of Castillo La Mancha (SESCAM). Toledo. Spain, Centro de Salud Benquerencia, Gadarrama s/n, Toledo 45313, Spain. Email: jturabianf@hotmail.com
Received Date: 01 August, 2017; Accepted Date: 07 September, 2017; Published Date: 13 September, 2017
Abstract
Objective: Report a
keratoconjunctivitis outbreak in a single family, and assess the epidemiologic
role of family doctor.
Patients and Methods: A prospective cohort study of an outbreak of keratoconjunctivitis in a single large family attended in a family medicine office was done, based on the genogram. Also, a case-control study was done to identify risk factors associated with contracting conjunctivitis. The location was a family medicine office, in Toledo, Spain.
Results: We found 18 patients with keratoconjunctivitis from May 1, 2017 and June 20, 2017, and who were evaluated prospectively (10 men and 8 women ranging in age from 25 to 86 years). The primary case in the outbreak was the mother of the family, who had been visited in the hospital consultation. The Attack Rate was 53% and the Secondary Attack Rate 50%. Analyzing possible sources and pathways of the infection, the illness was clearly related only with family characteristics. In all 18 patients (100%) recalled that a family member had also had conjunctivitis during a period of 1 week before the onset of symptoms. Patients with keratoconjunctivitis were more likely than control patients to be coexisting with another case, and especially maintain a close relationship with another case. The Relative Risk was only strong in the close relationship with one case (RR = 3.2), and moderate in the presence of poly pharmacy RR = 1.5.
Conclusions: This outbreak illustrates the potential for transmission of keratoconjunctivitis infection in the family. Family medicine is a major source of information about health problems and their outbreaks, and family physicians should be alert to cases of keratoconjunctivitis, and using their specific tools, cases diagnose ("Numerator"), characterize the family (Genogram, Relationships, Pathways Of Transmission), monitor the course of the disease and the outbreak (Continuous Care), and to know all the people at risk or attended ("Denominator"), to obtain epidemiological measurements -Attack rate, incidence and prevalence-, and implement measures to prevent and treat such epidemic infection.
Keywords: Cohort Studies; Continuity of Patient Care; Epidemic Keratoconjunctivitis; Epidemiology; Family Medicine; Family Members; Outbreak of Viral Conjunctivitis
1.
Introduction
Of the 18 cases, 8
were women (44%). The incubation time was estimated from a few days to a 2 week,
and the period of transmissibility from the end of the incubation period to 15
days following the onset of the disease. (Table 1)
shows the symptoms of EKC in cases.
Analyzing possible
sources and pathways of the infection, the illness was clearly related only
with family characteristics. In all 18 patients (100%) recalled that
a family member had also had conjunctivitis during a period
of 1-2 week before the onset of symptoms. Family member B, who lives with A and
K, however does not presented EKC; the rest of the family members explained to
the family doctor that B did not actually care for A or K, but the rest of the
family members, through the rotation scheme, performed this care.
Relative Risk (RR)
was calculated as the ratio between disease rate in subjects "Closely
Related to A Case of EKC", by sex, with "Polypharmacy (> 3 Drugs Prescribed)", with "Multitimorbidity"
(>3 diseases), and aged> 50 years in cases and non-cases of EKC (Table 3).
The RR informs us
about the strength of the association between factor exposure and disease (EKC)
-the number of times it is more likely that subjects exposed to that factor
become ill, relative to the unexposed. The RR was only strong in the close
relationship with one case (RR = 3.2), and moderate in the presence of
polypharmacy RR = 1.5.
Our initial case (patient A) had been in a nephrology consultation in the hospital in the 2 weeks prior to beginning their symptoms, so we thought that the primary mode of spread was nosocomial by contamination of the examiner's fingers, and in the family epidemic the mode of spread was close personal contact [30]. It has been reported that 30% of patients with EKC had been visited in an ophthalmology office during a period of 2 weeks before the onset of symptoms [20,26]. The reported data from outbreaks illustrate the highly contagious nature of adenovirus infection and the potential for transmission during routine office visits [23,27,28].
· Working with a population as a "Denominator": many health problems can only be identified within a population as a "Denominator" (Attack Rate, Incidence and Prevalence) [32-36].
·
Family care: The family doctor knows the life cycle of
individual and family. The basics concepts of life cycle suggest an underground
order of lifetime, where the individual, family, or illness exists only within
a context that follows a basic sequence or not deployed. The family structure
is a generic concept by which we mean a pattern, design or underground
structure of the life of a person / family at a given point in her life cycle.
Its primary components include: occupation, relationships, marriage, family,
and roles in different social contexts [37].
Intense and
influential relationships that will likely experience. However, these family
relationships can mean a resource but also a problem. In addition, many
problems that doctors initially identify as belonging to the individual level,
may be more appropriately understood as problems of the family system.
Moreover, the ill or incapacitated individual can often survive outside the
institutions with the support and care provided by their families.
Presents the purposes of epidemiological surveillance in family medicine, and BOX -2
5.
Conclusion
Figure 1: Keratoconjunctivitis Family
Outbreak Genogram.
Figure 2: Date of appearance of each
case of EKC.
Figure 3: Relationship between the study
of infectious diseases outbreak and family medicine.
Box 1: Purposes of Epidemiological
Surveillance in Family Medicine.
Box 2: Methods of Epidemiological
Control Applied to EKC In Family Medicine.
Symptoms of Epidemic keratoconjunctivitis |
Number of cases (N= 18) |
Red eye |
Everybody (100%)
|
Eye pain |
|
Itch |
|
Burning |
|
Photophobia |
|
Foreign body sensation in the eyes |
|
Secretions |
|
Blurry vision |
|
Cervical adenopathy |
O, P, Q, and J (4/18=22%) |
Follicles |
S, E, I, J, D, O, and Q (7/18=39%) |
Petequias |
S y E (2/18=11%) |
Corneal ulcer |
D, O, Q (3/18=17%) |
Pseudomembranes |
S, D, O, Q, I, and J (6/18=33%) |
Keratopathy |
J, I, D, O, S, and Q (5/18=28%) |
Table 1: Upper case letters identify cases (see text).
|
Cases (Sick) N=18 |
Non-Cases (Controls) (Not Sick) N=16 |
Statistical Significance |
Living with another case |
10 |
14 |
Chi-square=4.1634. p=.041306. Significant at p < .05. |
Close relationship |
14 |
16 |
Chi-square=9.4707. p=.002088. Significant at p < .05. |
Sex woman |
8 |
6 |
Chi-square=0.1687. p= .681314. Not significant at p < .05. |
Age> 50 years |
8 |
7 |
Chi-square=0.0017. p=.967531. Not significant at p < .05. |
Polypharmacy (> 3 drugs prescribed) |
5 |
2 |
Chi-square=1.2093. p=.271473. Not significant at p < .05. |
Multimorbidity (> 3 diseases) |
9 |
3 |
Chi-square=0.5543. p=.45655. Not significant at p < .05. |
Table 2: Risk Factors Associated With Ekc In Family Members.
Cases (N=18) |
Non-Cases (N=16) |
Rr=A/(A+B) / C/(C+D) |
|
Closely related to a case |
A=14 |
B=4 |
RR=3.2 (Strong Risk) |
Not closely related to a case |
C=4 |
D=12 |
|
Women |
A=8 |
B=6 |
RR=1.1 (Not significant risk) |
Men |
C=10 |
D=10 |
|
Polypharmacy |
A=5 |
B=2 |
RR=1.5 (Weak risk) |
No polypharmacy |
C=13 |
D=14 |
|
Multimorbity |
A=9 |
B=3 |
RR=1.9 (Moderate risk) |
No multimorability |
C=9 |
D=13 |
|
Age > 50 years |
A=8 |
B=7 |
RR=0.9 Not significant risk) |
Age <50 years |
C=10 |
D=9 |
Table 3: Relative Risk (Rr) [Rr = A / (A + B) / C / (C + D) Of Some Selected Variables in The Cases And Non-Cases Of Ekc Family Outbreak.
- Lilienfeld
DE, Stolley PD (1994) The Foundations of Epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Turabian JL (1995) Cuadernos de Medicina de Familia y Comunitaria. Una introducción a los principios de Medicina de Familia. Madrid: Díaz de Santos.
- Turabian JL (1995) Cuadernos de medicina de familia y comunitaria (Spanish) Paperback
- American Academy of Family Physicians (2014) Continuity of care, definition of.
- Gérvas J, Ortún V (1995) Caracterización del trabajo asistencial
del médico general de familia Aten
Primaria 16: 501-6.
- Stokes T, Tarrant C, Mainous III AG, Schers H, Freeman G, et al. (2005) Continuity of Care: Is the Personal Doctor Still Important? A Survey of General Practitioners and Family Physicians in England and Wales, the United States, and the Netherlands. Ann Fam Med 3: 353-359.
- Hill AP, Freeman GK (2011) Continuity of care. Promoting Continuity of Care in General Practice. RCGP Policy Paper. The Royal College of General Practitioners.
- Mackenzie J (2012) A Defence of the Thesis that “The opportunities of the general practitioner are essential for the investigation of disease and the progress of medicine”1921. Int J Epidemiol 41: 1507-18.
- Smith BH, Guthrie B, Sullivan FM, Morris AD (2012) Commentary: A thesis that still warrants defence and promotion. Int J Epidemiol 41: 1518-22.
- Baker R (2012) Commentary:
James Mackenzie 1921, still relevant in 2012. Int J Epidemiol 41: 1523-1525.
- Hart JT (2013) Commentary: Sir James Mackenzie (1853-1925): An ambiguous pioneer for research in primary care. Int J Epidemiol 41: 1525-1531.
- Turabian JL, Báez-Montiel B, Gutiérrez-Islas E (2016) Implications of Incidence Rates of Diseases at Local Level in Family Medicine. Scientific Pages Fam Med 1:002.
- Fry J (1992) Common Diseases: Their Nature Incidence and Care. Lancaster, England: MTP Press Limited.
- Thomas JV, Green WR, Mandell GL, Douglas RG, Bennett
JE. (1979) Conjunctivitis: Principles and practice of Infectious Diseases. New
York: John Wiley & Sons.
- Watts C, Shrader E (1998) How to do (or not to do) The genogram: a new
research tool to document patterns of decision-making, conflict and
vulnerability within households. Health
Policy Plan;
13: 459-64.
- De la Revilla Ahumada L. El genograma en la practica clinica. [homepage on the Internet].
- Báez Montiel B, Turabián Fernández JL (2012) Un genograma “Ufff y Mmmm”. AMF Joven; 1 (3).
- McIlvain H, Crabtree B, Medder J, Stange KC, Miller WL (1998) Using practice genograms to understand and describe practice configurations. Fam Med 30:490-6.
- Watson GI (1982) Epidemiology and research in a general practice. London: The Royal College of General Practitioners.
- Benenson AS [Editor] (1983) El control de las enfermedades transmisibles en el hombre. 13 Edición. Publicación Científica Nº 442. Organización Panamericana de la salud.
- Mueller AJ, Klauss V (1993) Main sources of infection in 145 cases of epidemic keratoconjunctivitis. Ger J Ophthalmol 2: 224-227.
- Meyer-Rüsenberg B, Loderstädt U, Richard G, Kaulfers PM, Gesser C (2011) Epidemic keratoconjunctivitis: the current situation and recommendations for prevention and treatment. Dtsch Arztebl Int 108: 475-480.
- Koçluk Y, Sukgen EA (2016) Different Clinical Presentations of the Same Epidemic Keratoconjunctivitis Outbreak in Premature Babies and Their Parents. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 6:1-6.
- Keenlyside RA, Hierholzer JC, D'Angelo LJ (1983) Keratoconjunctivitis associated with adenovirus type 37: an extended outbreak in an ophthalmologist's office. J Infect Dis 14: 191-198.
- Dawson
C, Jawetz E, Hanna I, Winn WET, Thompson C. A (1960) Family
Outbreak of Adenovirus 8 Infection (Epidemic Keratoconjunctivitis). Am J Hyg
72: 279-283.
- Taylor JW, Chandler
JW, Cooney MK (1978) Conjunctivitis due to adenovirus type 19. J Clin
Microbiol 8: 209-213.
- Buehler JW, Finton RJ, Goodman RA, Choi K, Hierholzer JC, Sikes RK, et al. (1984) Epidemic keratoconjunctivitis: report of an outbreak in an ophthalmology practice and recommendations for prevention. Infect Control 5: 390-394.
- Insler MS, Kern MD (1989) Keratoconjunctivitis due to adenovirus type 8: a local outbreak. South Med J 82: 159-160.
- D'Angelo LJ, Hierholzer JC, Holman RC, Smith JD (1981) Epidemic keratoconjunctivitis caused by adenovirus type 8: epidemiologic and laboratory aspects of a large outbreak. Am J Epidemiol 113: 44-49. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6257110
- Buffington J, Chapman LE, Stobierski MG, Hierholzer JC, Gary HE Jr, Guskey LE, et al. (1993) Epidemic keratoconjunctivitis in a chronic care facility: risk factors and measures for control. J Am Geriatr Soc 41: 1177-81.
- Vastine DW, West CE, Yamashiroya H, Smith R, Saxtan DD, et al. (1976) Simultaneous nosocomial and community outbreak of epidemic keratoconjunctivitis with types 8 and 19 adenovirus.Trans Sect Ophthalmol Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 81: 826-840.
- Moliner RB (1997) El médico de la familia en la vigilancia de salud. Rev Cubana Med Gen Integr 13: 59-62.
- Kilpatrick SJ, Boyle RM (1984) Prymary Care Research.
Encounter records and the denominator problem. New York: Praeger.
- Bass MJ (1976) Approaches to the denominator problem in primary care research. J Fam Pract 3:193-5.
- Schlaud M, Brenner MH, Hoopmann M, Schwartz FW (1998) Approaches to the denominator in practice-based epidemiology: a critical overview. J Epidemiol Community Health; 52 Suppl 1: 13S-19S.
- Bartholomeeusen S, Kim CY, Mertens R, Faes C, Buntinx F (2005) The denominator in general practice, a new approach from the Intego database. Fam Pract 22: 442-7.
- Bass MJ, Newell JP, Dickie GL (1976) An information system for family practice. Part 2: The value of defining a practice population. J Fam Pract 3: 525-528.
- Rolland JS (1994) Families, illness, and disability. An integrative treatment model. New York: Bassic Books.
- Turabián JL, Franco BP (2016) Turning Points and Transitions in the Health of the Patients: A Perspective from Family Medicine. J Family Med Community Health 3: 1087.
- Dumais N, and Jutras F (2017) Implementing Enhanced Podcasts in a Virology Class to Complement a PBL Learning Strategy: Students? Perceptions and Impact on Final Grade. Sci. Med. Center.
- Turk DC, Kerns RD (1985) Health, illness, and families. A life-span perspective. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
- McDaniel S, Campbell TL, Seaburn DB (1990) Family-oriented Primary Care. A manual for medical providers. New York: Springer-Verlag.
- Friedman H, Rohrbaugh M, Krakauer S (1988) The time-line genogram: highlighting temporal aspects of family relationships. Fam Process 27: 293-303.
- Rogers JC, Cohn P (1987) Impact of a screening family genogram on first encounters in primary care. Fam Pract 4: 291-301.
- Turabian JL, Perez-Franco B (2016) The Family Doctors: Images and Metaphors of the Family Doctor to Learn Family Medicine. New York. Nova Publishers.
- Turabian JL (2017) Fables of Family Medicine. A collection of fables that teach the Principles of Family Medicine. Saarbrücken, Deutschland/Germany: Editorial Académica Española.
- Turabian JL (2017) Fables of Family Medicine. A collection of clinical fables that teach the Principles of Family Medicine. Editorial Académica Española.