Assessing Radiologic Findings of Chest Radiographs in Patients with Trauma Admitted to the Emergency Room
Mahsa Mohammadian1, Alireza Shakibafard2, Mahsa Akhavan1, Zahra Ghahramani3*, Shahram Paydar3
1General
Practitioner, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
2Department of
Radiology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
3Trauma Research Center, Shahid Rajaee (Emtiaz) Trauma Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
*Corresponding author: Zahra Ghahramani, Trauma Research Center, Shahid Rajaee Trauma Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.Tel: +987136360697; Fax: +987136254206; Email: ghahreman2@yahoo.co.nz.
Received Date: 05 August, 2017; Accepted Date: 22 September,
2017; Published Date: 29 September, 2017
Citation: Mohammadian M, Shakibafard A,
Akhavan M, Ghahramani Z, Paydar S (2017) Assessing Radiologic Findings
of Chest Radiographs in Patients with Trauma Admitted to the Emergency Room. Emerg Med Inves: 155.
Background: According
to Advanced Trauma Life Support, chest radiography must be performed during the
initial evaluation of patients with trauma. We studied the CXR performed in the
emergency room of Rajaie Hospital to determine its usefulness.
Methods: In
this prospective study, patients who referred with high-energy trauma from
December 2013 until April 2014 were recruited. Their demographic
characteristics, including age, gender, and cause of trauma were recorded.
Meticulous medical history was taken from all patients and they were examined
by emergency medicine specialist. Simple radiographic CXR was performed for
selective patients and image findings and their mediastinal width were
recorded. All statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software version 20.0
and P-value less than 0.05 was considered significant.
Results: Of
the total 790 patients assessed, 137 patients were female (17.3%) and 655 were
male (82.7%). Mean age of patients was 35.13±17.01 (ranging from 12 to 91);
Mean mediastinal width was 80.9±11.45 mm (range: 49.2-142.29).
The most common causes of trauma included car-to-patient accident in 131
patients (16.5%), motor-to-car accident in 128 patients (16.2%), car turnover
in 103 (13%), falling down in 93 (11.7%), and stab wound 88 (11.1%). The most
common pathologic finding included rib fractures (42.7%), pneumothorax (11.6%),
abnormal diaphragmatic findings (10.3%), and hemothorax (8.3%).
Conclusion: The
results of the current study, in accordance to previous studies, suggest rib fractures,
pneumothorax, abnormal diaphragmatic findings, and hemothorax as the most
frequent findings in CXR that need to be assessed meticulously. Moreover, the
majority of patients were young males and the most frequent causes of trauma
included car accidents, falling down, and stab wound. Therefore, paying
attention to their diagnosis and treatment may increase the survival of this
important group of patients.
Keywords: Chest X-Ray;
Multiple Trauma; Radiologic Findings
1. Introduction
Multiple trauma is an important cause of death
worldwide [1], which is also a leading cause of mortality and
morbidity in Iran after cardiovascular injuries [2]. Although it is
estimated that a number of cases pass away before reaching medical centers, it is
essential to diagnose and manage the patients referring to trauma centers
rapidly and properly to increase their survival rate [3]. Among
various traumas the multiple traumas that a patient might experience, chest
trauma is ranked third and requires careful assessment [4].
Performing Chest X-Ray (CXR) in patients with multiple trauma is
recommended by Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) since 1992 [5]and is
performed in many countries as the standard trauma care [6]. It is
also an easy and fast imaging technique with low radiation dose [7]and can
be interpreted rapidly. Studies have also demonstrated that routine CXR
performed in the emergency room reduces further costs of patients [8].
Beside the advantages of chest radiography, some studies have
determined that reading the result of CXR once by the emergency medicine
specialist might be associated with errors and a second assessment by a
radiologist increases the accuracy of diagnosis [9]. Some have
proposed that assessing the indication of CXR by a trauma surgeon is safe and
efficacious and reduces total costs [10]. Others have demonstrated
that routine CXR is unnecessary in stable patients with normal physical
examination under 60 years [11-13]and some have indicated normal physical
examination parameters sufficient to eliminate some radiographs [14]. Some
others have compared other imaging methods to CXR, such as thoracic Computed
Tomography (CT) [15-17], and ultrasound [18,19]. Yet, the
gold standard imaging method stays a dilemma for detecting some pathologies
like diaphragmatic rupture [20].
As there is still no consensus on the indications and necessity
of CXR in multiple traumatized patients referring to emergency ward, this study
aimed to review the CXRs performed in the emergency room of Rajaie Hospital to
determine its usefulness.
2. Materials and Methods
In this prospective study, patients who referred with
high-energy trauma from December 2013 to April 2014 were recruited based on
convenient sampling. All patients gave consent for participation in the
research. CXR was performed for the patients by the following criteria:
decreased level of consciousness (GCS<13), subjective respiratory and chest
discomfort in any form (chest pain, chest compression, dyspnea, etc), positive
physical examination of the neck, chest or abdomen, and unrevealing or unreliable
chest physical examination for any reason [8]. The exclusion criteria
included any patient with a history of chest surgery or thoracic drainage at
arrival. The research protocol was approved by the Ethics committee of Rajaie
hospital.
Their demographic characteristics, including age, gender, and
cause of trauma were recorded. All patients were examined by emergency medicine
specialist after history taking. Simple radiographic CXR was performed for all
patients, which were read by a trained doctor and suspicious graphies were
reviewed by radiology specialist, and the image findings and their mediastinal
width were measured.
Categorical variables were described by numbers and percentages
and mean ± standard deviation was reported to describe continuous
variables. The comparison of mediastinal width among gender and age group was
performed by independent sample T test. All statistical analysis was performed
using SPSS software version 20.0 and P-value less than 0.05 was considered
significant.
3. Results
During the study period, considering the inclusion/exclusion
criteria, 795 patients referred to the emergency of ShahidRajaie hospital with
high-energy trauma and the data of 790 cases were ultimately analyzed, as three
patients did not give consent to use their data in the study and the data of
two patients were incorrectly recorded.
Mean age of patients was 35.13±17.01 (ranging from 12 to 91);
Regarding gender, 137 patients were female (17.3%) and 655 were male (82.7%);
the male-to-female ratio was 4.78:1. Mean age of female patients was
41.32±19.87 (14-85) and 33.83±16.07 (12-91) in men, which was significantly
different (P<0.001).
The most frequent causes of trauma included car-to-patient
accident in 131 patients (16.5%), motor-to-car accident in 128 cases (16.2%),
car turnover in 103 cases (13%), falling down in 93 (11.7%), and stab wound in
88 (11.1%). The complete causes of trauma are demonstrated in Figure 1.
The most frequent pathologic finding included rib fractures
(42.7%), pneumothorax (11.6%), abnormal diaphragmatic findings (10.3%), and
hemothorax (8.3%). The frequency of all radiologic findings is demonstrated
in Table 1.
Mean mediastinal width of patients was 80.9±11.45 (49.2-142.29)
mm with a median of 79.43 mm. Mediastinal width was not significantly different
by gender (P=0.36), but was significantly associated with age (P<0.001).
Pearson chi square test showed the association of cause of
trauma with pathologies as follows: right and left pneumothorax (P=0.873 and
0.023), right and left hemothorax (P=0.115 and 0.998), diaphragm and clavicle
problems (P=0.273 and 0.677, respectively), and rib fractures were not
associated with cause of trauma, except right rib fracture (P<0.001). Right
9th and 2nd rib fracture was associated with sex (P=0.058 and 0.043,
respectively), but other pathologies were not significantly correlated with
patients’ sex. Among cases with left pneumothorax 4 cases had car-car accident,
7 had motor-car accident, 16 stab wound, 8 cases car turnover, 6 falling down,
8 car-patient accident, 3 motor-patient accident, and 1 bicycle trauma, and 1
gunshot.
Regarding co-occurrence of pathologies, 7 cases (0.88%) had both
right and left pneumothorax, 18 cases (2.27%) had both right and left
hemothorax. 2 cases had right pneumothorax and right clavicle fracture, 1 case
had right pneumothorax and left clavicle fracture, 12 cases had left
pneumothorax and left clavicle fracture, 3 cases had right hemothorax and right
clavicle fracture, and 7 cases had left hemothorax and left clavicle fracture.
4 cases had both right pneumothorax and right diaphragmatic
abnormalities and 20 cases had both right hemothorax and right diaphragmatic
abnormalities cases and 1 patient had both left pneumothorax and right
diaphragmatic abnormalities, 3 patients had both left hemothorax and right
diaphragmatic abnormalities. Right diaphragmatic abnormalities co-occurred with
right clavicle fracture in 3 patients and none cases of left clavicle fracture.
Left diaphragmatic abnormalities co-occurred with right
hemothorax in 11 cases, right pneumothorax in 2 cases, left pneumothorax in 11
cases, left hemothorax in 1 case, right clavicle fracture in 4 and left
clavicle fracture in 1 patient.
4. Discussion
As the results of the current study, consistent to other studies [21-23], have
demonstrated, most traumatized patients are young men who are considered the
productive group in the society and performing CXR routinely for all
traumatized patients entering the emergency room exposes them to a high
radiation rate and increases health costs. Therefore, we have performed CXR
selectively for indicated patients.
Traumatic injuries has scarcely been studied in Iran. A recent
study in Shiraz declared a mean age of 26.6 years including 75.8% men and have
reported 22.9% car accident as the commonest cause of
injury [21]. Although they have not excluded chest trauma, their
results are comparable to the current study. Another study in Zahedan assessed
768 traumatic patients with a mean age of 23 including 80% men and have
similarly reported road traffic accidents as the most frequent cause (about
60%) [22]. The studied patients in the two above-mentioned studies
were apparently younger and they have not separated the forms of car accidents
to be comparable with our results. A wide-scaled study has evaluated 58013
traumatic patients in Tehran (48173 blunt trauma) and has reported a mean age
of 27 years with a male-to-female ratio of 4:1 and have reported the most
common causes of injuries as gunshot, traffic accidents involving pedestrians,
and falling in hospitalized patients [23], which was also in
accordance with our results, as we also had a 4.78:1 male-to-female ratio.
Although they have also not reported different statistics by body regions, they
have reported thorax as the third rank in most severe injuries. A
population-based study in 2003 also reported road traffics in 1071 million
males as the highest cause of disability premature deaths in
Iran [24]. Parallel to the results of the current study, the most
traumatized patients are young male who are considered the productive group in
the society. Thus, paying attention to their initial care is necessary to
provide the best approach for diagnosis and treatment and increase their
survival.
Considering the radiologic findings, the commonest pathologies
in the current study included rib fractures (42.7%), pneumothorax (11.6%),
abnormal diaphragmatic findings (10.3%), and hemothorax (8.3%). Similarly have
other studies reported different rates of abnormal CXR findings [9,17,25]. The
rate of pneumothorax in the current study was lower than the mentioned studies,
but as they also confirmed, pneumothorax can become a dangerous entity for the
patient and its early diagnosis is essential in traumatic patients and studies
have introduced different imaging methods as the most proper, accurate, and
rapid imaging technique for its diagnosis; some have suggested
CT [15], while others have concluded similar results reported by CXR
and ultrasound [18]. As long as CT scan has a high cost, radiation rate,
and long duration of imaging time and may be unavailable in all centers of our
country, the trauma guideline of Rajaie hospital has considered CXR as the
initial assessment of traumatic patients.
As studies have confirmed, selective CXR, as performed in the
present study, reduces the health costs and radiation amount and is a safe and
efficacious policy that prevents further
investigations [8,10], compared to routinely performed CXR for all
patients that has low clinical value [12], especially in stable
conscious trauma patients with normal physical examination [13]. As
long as there is no consensus on the gold standard imaging method, the trauma
guideline of Rajaie hospital has considered selective CXR as the initial
assessment of traumatic patients.
To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first study that
evaluated the details about the cause of trauma in chest traumas and the
comprehensive causes of road accidents and trauma in the current study help the
decision-makers to have a better view.
The present study had some strengths including controlling
errors of the study, for instance the emergency medicine specialist who read
the radiographs initially in the emergency ward was blind to the case.
Beside the advantages of this study, it also faced some
limitations, including not considering other socio-economic, psychologic, and
other demographic details of the patients. As far as the study was performed in
the emergency ward and there was limited time for gathering further details of
the patient, as the patient should have been diagnosed and treated rapidly. It
would also be greater, if we could compare the results of radiographies with CT
scans and ultrasonography that were not performed as they are not included in
the trauma guideline of Rajaie hospital. We also did not have the choice to
follow the patients, to observe if they required repeating the imaging or what
further interventions they needed. Future studies are needed to give the emergency
medicine specialists a better view in diagnosis and management of multiple
traumatic patients.
The results of the current study, in accordance to previous
studies, suggest rib fractures, pneumothorax, abnormal diaphragmatic findings,
and hemothorax as the most frequent findings in CXR that need to be assessed
meticulously. Moreover, the majority of patients were young males and the most
frequent causes of trauma included car accidents, falling down, and stab wound.
Therefore, paying attention to their diagnosis and treatment may increase the
survival of this important group of patients.
Figure 1: Frequency of Causes
of Trauma in the Studied Patients.
RIGHT
|
No. |
% |
LEFT |
No. |
% |
Total percentage |
Pneumothorax |
38 |
4.8 |
Pneumothorax |
54 |
6.8 |
11.6 |
Hemothorax |
65 |
8.2 |
Hemothorax |
1 |
0.1 |
8.3 |
Diaphragm Abnormalities |
25 |
3.2 |
Diaphragm Abnormalities |
56 |
7.1 |
10.3 |
Clavicle Fx |
28 |
3.5 |
Clavicle Fx |
25 |
3.2 |
6.7 |
1st Rib Fx |
5 |
0.6 |
1st Rib Fx |
4 |
0.5 |
1.1 |
2nd Rib Fx |
16 |
2.0 |
2nd Rib Fx |
13 |
1.6 |
3.6 |
3rd Rib Fx |
21 |
2.7 |
3rd Rib Fx |
24 |
2.7 |
5.4 |
4th Rib Fx |
24 |
3.0 |
4th Rib Fx |
24 |
3.0 |
6.0 |
5th Rib Fx |
27 |
3.4 |
5th Rib Fx |
20 |
2.5 |
6.9 |
6th Rib Fx |
25 |
3.2 |
6th Rib Fx |
20 |
2.5 |
5.7 |
7th Rib Fx |
19 |
2.4 |
7th Rib Fx |
22 |
2.8 |
5.2 |
8th Rib Fx |
15 |
1.9 |
8thRib Fx |
18 |
2.3 |
4.2 |
9th Rib Fx |
13 |
1.6 |
9th Rib Fx |
7 |
0.9 |
2.5 |
10th Rib Fx |
8 |
1.0 |
10th Rib Fx |
4 |
0.5 |
1.5 |
11th Rib Fx |
1 |
0.1 |
11th Rib Fx |
3 |
0.4 |
0.5 |
12th Rib Fx |
1 |
0.1 |
12th Rib Fx |
0 |
0 |
0.1 |
Table 1: Frequency of Radiologic Findings of the Studied Patients.
- Baker CC, Oppenheimer L,
Stephens B, Lewis FR, Trunkey DD (1980) Epidemiology of trauma deaths. The
American Journal of Surgery 140:144-150.
- Mehrdad R (2009) Health system
in Iran. JMAJ52:69-73.
- Zadeh H, Vahabi R, Nazparvar B,
Amoei M (2002) An epidemiological study and determination of causes of traffic
accident-related deaths in Tehran, Iran (during 2000–2001). Journal of clinical
forensic medicine 9:74-77.
- LoCicero 3rd J, Mattox K (1989) Epidemiology of
chest trauma. The Surgical clinics of North America 69:15-19.
- Collicott PE (1992)Advanced
Trauma Life Support (Atls): Past, Present, Future-16th Stone Lecture, American
Trauma Society. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery33:749-753.
- Bouillon B, Kanz K, Lackner C, Mutschler W,
Sturm J (2004) The importance of advanced trauma life support (ATLS) in the
emergency room. Der Unfallchirurg107:844-850.
- Wall B, Hart D (1997) Revised radiation doses
for typical X-ray examinations. Report on a recent review of doses to patients
from medical X-ray examinations in the UK by NRPB. National Radiological
Protection Board. The British journal of radiology70:437-439.
- Paydar S, Ahmadi A, Dalfardi
B, Shakibafard A, Abbasi H, et al. (2014) Clinical and economic effects of
selective radiological evaluation of high-energy trauma patients: a prospective
experience of a level 1 busy trauma centre. Emergency Medicine Journalemermed:
204083.
- Aukema TS, Beenen LF,
Hietbrink F, Leenen LP (2012) Initial assessment of chest X-ray in thoracic
trauma patients: Awareness of specific injuries. World journal of radiology4:48.
- Sears BW, Luchette FA,
Esposito TJ, Dickson EL, Grant M, et al. (2005) Old fashion clinical judgment
in the era of protocols: is mandatory chest X-ray necessary in injured
patients? Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery59:324-332.
- Wisbach GG, Sise MJ, Sack DI, Swanson SM,
Sundquist SM, et al. (2007) What is the role of chest X-ray in the initial
assessment of stable trauma patients? Journal of Trauma and Acute Care
Surgery62:74-79.
- Paydar S, Johari HG, Ghaffarpasand F, Shahidian
D, Dehbozorgi A, et al. (2012) The role of routine chest radiography in initial
evaluation of stable blunt trauma patients. The American journal of emergency
medicine 30:1-4.
- Forouzanfar MM, Safari S,
Niazazari M, Baratloo A, Hashemi B, et al. (2014) Clinical decision rule to
prevent unnecessary chest X‐ray in patients with blunt multiple traumas. Emergency
Medicine Australasia 26:561-566.
- Rodriguez RM, HendeyGW, Marek
G, Dery RA, Bjoring A (2006) A pilot study to derive clinical variables for
selective chest radiography in blunt trauma patients. Annals of emergency
medicine47:415-418.
- Trupka A, Waydhas C, Hallfeldt K, Nast-Kolb D,
Pfeifer K, et al. (1997) Value of thoracic computed tomography in the first
assessment of severely injured patients with blunt chest trauma: results of a
prospective study. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery43:405-412.
- Exadaktylos AK, Sclabas G, Schmid SW, Schaller
B, Zimmermann H (2001) Do we really need routine computed tomographic scanning
in the primary evaluation of blunt chest trauma in patients with “normal” chest
radiograph? Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery51:1173-1176.
- Traub M, Stevenson M, McEvoy
S, Briggs G, Lo SK, et al. (2007) The use of chest computed tomography versus
chest X-ray in patients with major blunt trauma. Injury38:43-47.
- Ma OJ, Mateer JR (1997) Trauma
ultrasound examination versus chest radiography in the detection of hemothorax.
Annals of emergency medicine29:312-316.
- Blaivas M, Lyon M, Duggal S (2005) A prospective
comparison of supine chest radiography and bedside ultrasound for the diagnosis
of traumatic pneumothorax. Academic Emergency Medicine 12:844-849.
- Shapiro M, Heiberg E, Durham R, Luchtefeld W,
Mazuski J (1996) The unreliability of CT scans and initial chest radiographs in
evaluating blunt trauma induced diaphragmatic rupture. Clinical radiology
51:27-30.
- Abbasi HR, Mousavi SM, Akerdi AT, Niakan MH,
Bolandparvaz S, et al. (2013) Pattern of traumatic injuries and Injury Severity
Score in a major trauma center in Shiraz, Southern Iran. Bulletin of Emergency
and Trauma1:81-85.
- Chardoli M, Rahimi-Movaghar V
(2006) Analysis of trauma outcome at a university hospital in Zahedan, Iran
using the TRISS method. East African medical journal83:440-442.
- Zargar M, Modaghegh M-HS, Rezaishiraz H (2001)
Urban injuries in Tehran: demography of trauma patients and evaluation of
trauma care. Injury32:613-617.
- Naghavi M, Abolhassani F,
Pourmalek F, Lakeh MM, Jafari N, et al. (2009) The burden of disease and injury
in Iran 2003. Population health metrics 7:9.
- Ball CG, Ranson K, Dente CJ, Feliciano DV, Laupland KB, Dyer D, et al. (2009) Clinical predictors of occult pneumothoraces in severely injured blunt polytrauma patients: a prospective observational study. Injury40:44-47.