Chemotherapy of Coccidiosis in Calves
Razia Sultana1*, Shabnum CH Ilyas1, Azhar Maqbool2,
Zafar CH Iqbal2, Mansur-ud-Din Ahmad2, Zahid M Ahmad3
1Department of Livestock and Dairy Development, Lahore, Pakistan
2Faculty
of Veterinary Sciences, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore,
Pakistan
3Kot
Khawaja Saeed Teaching Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan
*Corresponding author: Razia Sultana, Department of Livestock and Dairy Development, Lahore, Pakistan. Tel: +923014441753; Email: drraziasultana6@gmail.com
Received Date: 09 August, 2017; Accepted Date: 25 August, 2017; Published Date: 03 September, 2017
Citation: Sultana R, Ilyas SCH, Maqbool A, Iqbal ZCH, Ahmad MD, et al.
1. Abstract
Thirty-Six bovine calves less than three months of age were purchased from the Market and reared under standard manage mental conditions. Prior to start the experiment claves were examined for the presence of endoparasite and treated accordingly. The calves were provided green fodder along with concentrates. After one week of deworming and acclimatization, 36 calves were divided into 6 groups. Group A, B, C, D and E were experimentally infected at the rate of 20000 oocysts of E. bovis Group 1 (Healthy control 1) was kept as healthy control (Non-infected and non- medicated). In present study, efficacy of different chemotherapeutic agents against coccidiosis in cow calves was determined. It was concluded amprolium, lasalocid, sulphaquinoxaline, toltrazuril were very effective in treatment of coccidiosis in calves. Non-significant difference-(P>0.05) was observed in percentage efficacy of all four anti coccidial drugs at day 28 onward, i.e 100% for Amprolim, Sulphaquinoxaline, Toltrazuril and 99% for lasalocid. All the four drugs showed satisfactory results at their recommended dose against coccidiosis in cow calves and no toxic effects were found during and after treatment.
2. Keywords: Calves; Chemotherapy; Coccidiosis
1. Introduction
Livestock has an important and crucial role in rural economy and rural socio-economic development. There are at present about 44.4 million cattle and 37.7 million buffaloes. The annual production of milk production by cattle and buffalo is 20,143 million tons and 34,122 million tons respectively. Beef production is 2,085 million tons per year. Livestock products (Hides) by cattle and buffalo are 8,416 and 7,897 million, respectively. Nearly 8 million families are involved in livestock rising deriving more than 35 percent income from livestock production activities. Livestock can play an important role in poverty alleviation and foreign exchange earnings for the country [1]. Coccidiosis is an intestinal disease that affects several animal species. In cattle, it may produce clinical symptoms in animals from 1 month to 1 year of age, but it can infect all age groups [2]. Nearly all vertebrate animals host one or more species of the protozoan parasites that produce the infection referred to as Coccidiosis or coccidiosis. Thousands of coccidian species of herbivorous, omnivorous, and carnivorous animals have been described, and many more exist that remain unnamed.
2. Materials & Methods
Thirty-Six bovine calves less than three months of age were purchased from the Market and reared under standard manage mental conditions. Prior to start the experiment claves were examined for the presence of endoparasite and treated accordingly. The calves were provided green fodder along with concentrates. After one week of deworming and acclimatization, 36 calves were divided into 6 groups. Group A, B, C, D and E were experimently infected at the rate of 20000 oocysts of E. bovis. Group (control 1) was kept as healthy control (Non-infected and non- medicated). Group (Healthy control 1): Animals of this group were kept as non-infected and non- medicated healthy control,
· Group A: Animals of this group were kept as infected and non-medicated control.
·
Group B: Animals
of this group were kept as infected and medicated with Amprolium. @ 10 mg / kg body
weight / day for five days
·
Group C: Animals
of this group were kept as infected and medicated with Toltrazuril was
administered @ 15mg / Kg body weight for 4 days
·
Group D: Animals
of this group were kept as infected and medicated with Lasalocid Sodium@ 1 mg /
kg body weight / day for 4 days.
·
Group E: The
members of this group were kept as infected and medicated with
Sulfaquinoxaline. @ 5 mg / lb body weight /day for 4 days it was concluded
amprolium lasalocid, sulphaquinoxaline, and toltrazuril were very effective in
treatment of coccidiosis in calves. No toxic signs were observed in the present
study by using amprolium, lasalocid, sulphaquinoxaline, toltrazuril at their
recommended dose rate.
2.1. Monitoring of Experimental Calves
A faucal oocysts count in experimental calves was made at weekly interval in all the experimental animals. Counting will be done by McMaster Technique [15]. The results were analyzed statically by using one-way analysis of variance.
3. Results and Discussion
The project was designed to record the prevalence of coccidiosis and to conduct chemotherapeutic trials by using different drugs. For therapeutic trials thirty-six bovine calves under three months of age were purchased from Dairy farm and were randomly divided into six groups i.e Control 1, A, B, C, D and E. The animals in group Control 1 were healthy (non-infected) and no medicine was given and acted as control. Animals in group A were infected and no treatment was given and acted as infected control where as animals in groups B, C, D, and E were treated with Amprolium, toltrazuril, Lasalocid sodium and Sulfaquinoxaline respectively.
3.1. Faecal Oocyust Count
From the (Table 1), it was evident that all the drugs used in these trials i.e Amprolium, toltrazuril, Lasalocid sodium and Sulfaquinoxaline gave 100% efficacy on day 28 onward. These were also safe and no toxic effects were seen in any of treated case.
Statistically there was no significant difference in
the Oocyst Per Gram (OPG) of faeces between groups B, C, D, E. But when they
were compared with the group A of infected non-medicated group there was highly
significant difference noted. During the present study medication with
toltrazuril at recommended 15 mg/kg to group C. Fecal samples were examined
daily post treatment. It was also observed that on day 7 post treatment there
was no diarrhea recorded in all animals. Total 6 experimental animals
recovered. No oocysts of Eimeria in fecal samples was seen on day 37
indicate recovery from coccidiosis. Mundt et.al. [16], reported
that early treatment with toltrazuril controlled the infection and prevented
clinical disease while the effect of late treatment was limited. The
application of 15mg toltrazuirl/kg BW with in the prepatent period recommended
for the control of E. bovis infection. In the present study Amprolium
was given at dose rate of 10 mg/Kg body weight for 5 days. Total of
experimental animals recovered by day 6 post treatment. The results of drug
trial with amprolium were also encouraging. Nearly
similar results were reported by P.H.G. Stockdale and Anne Sheard [17]. Amprolium was for the most part effective in preventing
clinical signs, in suppressing reduced rates of weight and in reducing oocyst
production. Amprolium was also effective in a dosage of 143mg/kg body
weight when given for 5 days (13 to 18 days after inoculation). Nearly similar
results were also reported by [18]. In the present study lasalocid was
given at dose rate of @ 1 mg / kg body weight / day for 4 days. Total of experimental animals
recovered by day 6 post treatment. The results of drug trial with lasalocid
were also encouraging. Nearly same results were reported by Peter D.
Constable [19]. He reported that lasalocid a level of 1 mg/kg is the most effective and rapid and is
recommended when outbreaks of Coccidiosis are imminent. It was concluded
amprolium, lasalocid, sulphaquinoxaline, toltrazuril were very effective in
treatment of coccidiosis in calves. No toxic signs were observed in the present
study by using amprolium, lasalocid, sulphaquinoxaline, toltrazuril at their
recommended dose rate. During the present study, highly significant difference
(P<0.05) was observed treated groups compared with control group. Similar result
was also reported by Horak [20]. It was also
noted that no oocyst was found in any treated animal as was also reported by Aiello
[21].
4. Acknowledgement
All the praises and thanks are for Allah, Almighty who bestowed me with the potential and ability to contribute a little material to the existing knowledge. I offer my humblest thanks to Holy Prophet “Muhammad” (Peace Be upon Him) who forever remains a torch of guidance and knowledge for humanity as a whole. I would like to express and deep sense of obligation to my major supervisor Prof. Dr. Azhar Maqbool, Prof. Dr. Mansoor-ud-Din Ahmad, Prof Dr. Zafar Iqbal Ch, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan and Dr. Muhammad Zahid Ahmad, Kot Khawaja Saeed Teaching Hospital, Lahore and Dr Shabnum Ilyas Ch Deputy Director Livestock Lahore for their keen interest skillful guidance, enlightened views, valuable suggestions, constructive criticism, unfailing patience and an inspiring attitude during my studies, research project and writing of this manuscript.
Groups |
Name of Drugs |
OPG |
|||||
Zero Day |
7th Day |
14th Day |
21st Day |
28th Day |
35th Day |
||
|
|
Mean +/- S.E P Value |
Mean +/- S.E P Value |
Mean +/- S.E P Value |
Mean +/- S.E P Value |
Mean +/- S.E P Value |
Mean +/- S.E P Value |
Control 1 |
Non-Infected Non-Medicated, Healthy Control |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
A |
Infected Non-Medicated Control |
28508+/-32.416 0.027 |
12050+/-323.006 0.000 |
6050+/-210.554 0.000 |
3050+/-136.626 0.000 |
2200+/-57.735 0.000 |
1200+/-44.721 0.000 |
B |
Infected & Treated with Amprolium |
28000+/-288.675 0.027 |
350+/- 25.508 0.000 |
150+/- 7.416 0.000 |
130+/- 3.415 0.000 |
-
|
-
|
C |
Infected & Treated with Toltrazuril |
29750+/- 561.842 0.027 |
300+/- 24.614 0.000 |
135+/- 11.690 0.000 |
50+/- 6.831 0.000 |
-
|
- |
D |
Infected & Treated with Lasalocid |
28050+/-610.327 0.027 |
400+/- 14.43 0.000 |
280+/- 7.745 0.000 |
140+/- 8.563 0.000 |
80+/- 3.415 0.000 |
- |
E |
Infected & Treated with Sulfaquinoxaline |
27500+/-483.045 0.000 |
270+/- 17.061 0.000 |
140+/- 483.167 0.000 |
125+/- 10.954 0.000 |
-
|
- |
Table 1: Comparative efficacy of different drugs against Coccidiosis in calves.
1.
Economic
Survey of Pakistan (2016-2017) Agriculture
III. Livestock and Poultry: 17-18.
2.
Stokka (2017) Coccidiosis
Affecting Young Calves. NDSU Agriculture Communication.
3.
Jolley WR, Bardsley KD
(2006) Ruminant Coccidiosis. Vet
Clin North Am Food Anim Pract 22: 613-621.
4.
Dedrickson BJ
(2006) Coccidiosis in beef calves. Alpharma animal health division fort lee, nj07024.
5.
Usarova EI (2008) Eimeria of
cattle in the Republic of Dagestan. Parazitologiia 42: 240-242.
6.
Pandit
BA (2009) Prevalence of coccidiosis in cattle in kashmir valley. Vet Scan 4: 16-20.
8.
Kennedy
MJ (2006) Coccidiosis in cattle. Alberta feedlot: 1-4.
11.
Oluwadare AT,
Ajayi JA, Ajayi OO, Ogwurike BA, Olaniyan O, et al. (2010) Studies on some
aspects of the bionomics of bovine coccidiosis in plateau State, Nigeria. Nigerian
annals of natural sciences 10: 9-27.
14.
Daugschies AM,
Akimaru, Burger HJ (1986) Experimentelle Eimeria bovis
Infektionen beim Kalb: Parasitologische and Klinische Befunde. Dusch Tierarztl Wschr 93: 393-397.
15.
Zajac A, Garrya
AC (2006) Faecal examination for the diagnosis of parasitism. Veterinary
Clinical parasitology. In: 7th edi:
3-10.
18.
Peardon DL, Bilkovich
FR, Todd AC, Hoyt HH (1965) Trails of candidate bovine coccidiostats: efficacy
of amprolium, lincomycin, sulfamethazine, chloroquine sulfate, and
diphenthane-70. Am J Vet Res 687.
20.
Horak R (1969) These
of amprolium the treatment coccidiosis in domestic ruminants. J South Vet Ma 40:
292-299.
21.
Aiello E, Susan
(1998) coccidiosis of cattle. Veterinary Merck manual 8th edition.