Comparing Efficacy and Safety of Aripiprazole to Placebo in Children and Adolescents with Tourette’s Syndrome
Mahmoud
Okasha*
Department
of Psychiatry, Yale University Medical School, Norwich, USA
*Corresponding author: Mahmoud Okasha,
Department of Psychiatry, Yale University Medical School, Norwich, USA. Tel:
+18606089149; Email: okashac@aol.com
Received Date: 13
August 2018; Accepted Date: 03
October, 2018; Published Date: 12
October, 2018
Citation: Okasha M (2018) Comparing Efficacy and Safety of Aripiprazole to Placebo in Children and Adolescents with Tourette’s Syndrome. J Psychiatry Cogn Behav: JPCB-143. DOI: 10.29011/2574-7762. 000043
1. Abstract
1.1. Objective: Primary: To compare the efficacy of aripiprazole to placebo in the suppression of tics in children and adolescents (7-17) with a diagnosis of Tourette’s in one of 33 sites. Secondary: To evaluate the safety and tolerability of Aripiprazole once daily in children and adolescents.
1.2. Method: After signing an ICF/IAF Four subjects were screened at our site, three of which were children, and one adolescent. Subjects were randomized to either a low dose, high dose, or placebo, 1:1:1 according to their weight (low dose for those at or less than 50 kg, high dose for those over 50 kg). Aripiprazole 5-10 mg for low dose and 10-20 mg for high dose. Subjects were seen at the clinic at weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8. A telephone contact was made to the subjects on weeks 3, 5 and 7. Primary efficacy measure was change from baseline to end of study (week 8) in Total Tic Score (TTS) of the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS). Secondary measure was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of aripiprazole in participants.
2.
Introduction
Gilles
de la Tourette Syndrome (TS) is a neuropsychiatric condition characterized by a
rapid, sudden recurrent, non-rhythmic, stereotyped motor movements and
vocalizations (tics). These can be simple or complex in nature. They start in
early childhood and are most prominent around 10 years of age. The tics wax and
wane through their course and decrease by late adolescence and adulthood. The
tics are typically chronic and have to last for one year or more [1] and cause psychological impairment [1,2]. The disorder is thought to often be accompanied
by comorbid OCD (50%) and/or ADHD (50%) [2,3].
The prevalence ranges from 0.3-1.0% [2,3]. It
has a strong heritable component, possibly polygenetic [3]
and possibly in an autosomal dominant pattern [4,5].
It is believed to be due to a disturbance in the dopaminergic and serotonergic
systems [6,3] although other systems may be
involved like noradrenergic, glutamatergic, GABA-ergic, cholinergic, and opioid
systems [5,7]. The implicated areas of the brain
where dopaminergic and serotonergic pathways interact are believed to be basal
ganglia (the striatum) and the prefrontal cortex. The thalamus may also be
implicated [3,6]. MRI studies and
electrophysiological investigations have identified alterations in brain areas
of the cortico-striato-thalamic cortical circuits. Studies using amphetamine
challenge to study D2 receptors availability in striatal circuits have revealed
increased dopamine release in ventral striated areas in TS patients after
amphetamine challenge [2].
3.
Abbreviations
AIMS : Abnormal Involuntary Movement
Scale
BARS : Barned Akathisia Rating Scale
CDRS-R : Children’s Depression Rating
Scale-Revised
CGII : Clinical Global Impression Scale
Improvement
CGIS : Clinician Global Impression Scale
C SSRS : Columbia
Suicide Severity Rating Scale
CY BOCS : Children’s Yale-Brown Obsessive
Compulsive Scale
PARS : Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale
SAS : Simpson Angus Scale
SNAP : Swanson, Nolan and Pelham Rating
Scale for ADHD
TS : Tourette syndrome
TTS : Total Tic Score
YGTSS : Yale
Global Tic Severity Scale
4.
Treatment
Treatment
of TS can be subdivided into non-pharmacological and pharmacological.
4.1.
Non-pharmacological
1. Behavioral treatment most
successful is Habit Reversal Training (HRT) [8].
2. Deep Brain Stimulation in
refractory TS [9,10].
4.2.
Pharmacological
1.
Positive
effects for D2 dopamine receptor blockage have been reported in the treatment
of tics for 40 years, although actual evidence based on RCT are limited [6,11].
2.
Most
commonly used medications:
a.
Typical
Antipsychotic Agents
i. Haloperidol
ii. Pimozide
b.
Atypical
Antipsychotics:
i. Aripiprazole
ii. Olanzapine
iii. Quetiapine
iv. Risperidone
v. Ziprasidone
c.
Alpha-adrenergic
agonists
i. Clonidine
ii. Guanfacine
d.
Benzamides
i. Sulpiride
ii. Tiapride
Aripiprazole
showed promising results in open-label studies because it has high affinity to
D2 receptors but acts as a partial agonist to D2, 5HT1A and antagonistic of
5HT2A, however, there has not been any RTC with sizable populations to
demonstrate the efficacy and safety of Aripiprazole in treating Tourette’s
Syndrome in children and adolescents until now [12-16].
5.
Design
This report shows
the results of our site (4 subjects). 33 sites were involved in the large study
(110 subjects). 110 subjects in two weight groups (low groups and high groups).
The subjects were divided into three groups: 1/3rd of subjects in the low
group, receiving 5-10mg of aripiprazole, 1/3rd
of subjects in the high group receiving 10-20 mg of aripiprazole, and 1/3rd of
subjects were randomized to placebo. The IRB used was Quorum Review INC.
5.1. 2 Phases
1) Pre-treatment phase: screening and
washout period.
2) Treatment phase: 8 weeks with
baseline visit (day 0).
All
psychotropic medications were discontinued for at least 14 days prior to
baseline. Psychostimulant medication was permitted during the trial provided
the dose was stable for four weeks prior to the screening visit, and the
subjects did not develop or have an exacerbation of tics. All SSRI and SNRI
medications were discontinued 28 days prior to baseline.
5.2.
Assessments
After signing an ICF/IAF, subjects were
screened using DSM-IV-TR criteria for a diagnosis of Tourette’s syndrome by the
Principal Investigator. K-SADS-PL- with diagnostic supplements was administered
to confirm diagnosis by the Principal Investigator. After washout of prohibited
medications according to the protocol, the following instruments were
administered at screening:
1.
YGTSS:
TSS (of more than or equal to 20 at screening and baseline).
2.
CYBOCS
was completed.
3.
CSSRS
was completed.
4.
Body
weight, vital signs with blood pressure and heart rate were measured (subject
supine for 5 minutes and standing for 2 minutes.).
5.
12
lead ECG was performed.
6.
Fasting
blood samples collected.
7.
Urinalysis
collected.
8.
Urine
drug screen administered.
9.
Blood
samples obtained for a serum pregnancy test.
10.
Thyroid
function test was performed.
11.
Prolactin
levels were performed.
12.
Clinical
laboratory tests were performed.
5.3.
At Baseline
YGTSS, CGI-TS, SNAP-IV, CYBOCS, CDRS-R,
PARS, and C-SSRS (since last visit), SAS, AIMS and BARS. Vital signs and
height, body weight and waist circumference, physical examination, 3-12 lead
ECG were all performed. Urine for drug screen was collected. Subjects were
dispensed study drug. Adverse Events and concomitant medications were recorded.
5.4.
Treatment
Subjects continued IP through week 7
taking the last dose of the IP one day before week 8. Subjects were seen at the
clinic at weeks 1, 2, 4 and 6. The following instruments were administered,
YGTSS, CGI-TS, SNAP-IV, CY-BOCS, C-SSRS, SAS, AIMS and BARS. CDRS-R and PARS
were only performed at weeks 2 and 4. Weeks 3, 5 and 7 were telephonic contacts
only. At week 4 all procedures including CDRS-R and PARS, 12 lead ECG, complete
physical examination, height, weight, waist circumference, vital signs, fasting
blood samples, urinalysis and pharmacokinetics were performed.
6.
Results
There were four subjects that completed
the study; 1 male adolescent (13 years) and 3 children; 2 females ages 8 and 9,
and one male age 7. None of the subjects had OCD symptoms.
YGTSS:
Scores
ranged from 44-79 at baseline, and from 0-23 at completion (week 8). In subject
3175, baseline was 44 compared to completion of 10. In subject 3085 baseline
was 63 compared to a completion score of 23. In subject 3071 baseline was 79
compared to a completion of 14. Lastly, subject 3012’s scores fell from 75 at
baseline to 0.5 at completion.
CDRS-R: Scores ranged from 18-32 at
baseline and from 17-19 at completion (week 8). In subject 3175, baseline vs
completion was 32:17. For subject 3085, baseline vs completion was 19:17. For
subject 3071 baseline vs completion was 27:17. Finally, subject 3012 was 18 at
baseline compared to 19 at completion.
CGI-S: Score of 4 at baseline and scores
of 1-2 at completion (week 8). In subject 3175 baseline compared to completion
was 4:2. In subject 3085, baseline compared to completion was 4:2. In subject
3071 was 4:1. Finally, in subject 3012 baseline was 4, compared to completion
score of 1.
CGI-I: Score of 1-2 at completion (week
8). In subject 3175, subject was found to be very much improved. The same went
for subject 3085 and 3012. Subject 3071 was found to be much improved.
There
were no changes in the SAS, AIMS, or BARS from baseline to completion in all
four subjects (Score of 0 at baseline and 0 at completion).
CYBOCS: None of the 4 subjects met a
diagnosis of OCD.
SNAP-IV: One patient showed a dramatic
response in her inattention, impulsivity, hyperactivity and ODD scores from
baseline to week 8. Another subject who was diagnosed with ADHD and was
receiving a stimulant (Adderall) showed a decrease in his inattention,
impulsivity and ODD scores from baseline to week 8.
PARS: There was a decrease in the number
of overall anxiety symptoms. There was no significant change in frequency,
severity of physical symptoms of anxiety, severity of anxiety symptoms, overall
avoidance of anxiety provoking situations, interference with family
relationships or performance, interference with peer and adult relationships
and/or performance outside the home.
6.1. Vital Signs
·
Weight:
There was an increase in weight in 3 of the 4 subjects and a decrease in weight
in one subject between baseline and completion (week 8).
·
Waist
circumference: 2 subjects showed a decrease in their waist circumference and 2
subjects showed an increase between baseline and completion (week 8).
·
Blood
pressure and pulse: Supine and standing blood pressure and pulse showed no
consistent changes from baseline to completion (week 8).
·
ECG:
No significant changes.
·
Prolactin:
Three out of four patients showed a decrease in their prolactin levels.
7.
Discussion
This report is limited because it reports
the findings of one site out of 33 sites. However, it was one of the more
successfully enrolling sites. There was a robust decrease in the TSS scores
from baseline to completion (week 8), an 80% mean decrease in TSS scores from
baseline to completion. There is a mean decrease of 63% in the severity of tics
as evidenced by CGI-S scores from baseline to completion. There was improvement
in the CGI-I from baseline to completion. These findings emphasize the efficacy
of Aripiprazole in treating tics in Tourette’s syndrome as found in other
studies [1,11,17].
The
safety and tolerability of Aripiprazole is evidenced by the lack of any
significant AE’s, specifically extrapyramidal symptoms and akathisia, which are
often the result of using typical and some atypical antipsychotics in treating
different psychotic disorders (no change in SAS, AIMS, or BARS from baseline to
completion) [18-20]. There was no significant
change in vitals (BP, HR). There was an increase in weight in 3 out of 4
subjects, and 2 subjects showed an increase in their waist circumference. Of
interest is the decrease in the prolactin levels in three of the four subjects.
Aripiprazole is not reported to increase the serum prolactin levels because of
its mechanism of action [1,2]. Because of the
small number of subjects, it is difficult to extrapolate from these findings
any significant changes in the PARS or the CDRS, although there was a decrease
in the number of anxiety symptoms which was not statistically significant.
There was a decrease in the depressive symptoms (one subject had a reduction of
48% from baseline, one subject had a reduction of 37% from baseline) given the
mechanisms of action of Aripiprazole with its agonistic property on 5HT1A and
antagonistic property of 5HT2A and its use as adjunctive treatment with
antidepressants in MDD, one would expect a positive effect on depressive
symptoms, which happened with 2 out of 4 subjects. However, the CDRS scores
were low at Baseline and the limited number of subjects does not allow for a
definitive conclusion.
8.
Conclusion
Four subjects with Tourette’s syndrome
were treated with Aripiprazole 5-20 mg with a robust decrease of the YGTSS,
maintained throughout the study confirming other previous studies that found
Aripiprazole was effective and safe in treating symptoms of Tourette’s Syndrome
in children and adolescents.
Figure 1: Changes in total
TIC score of the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale at Baseline and End Point.
Figure 2: Results of the
Children’s Depression Rating Scale Revised at Baseline and Endpoint.
Figure 3: Changes in the
Clinical Global Impression Scale for Tourette’s Disorder from Baseline to
Endpoint.
Figure 4: Results of the
Clinical Global Impression Improvement for Tourette’s Disorder at Endpoint Week
8.
Prolactin Levels |
||
Subject |
Screen |
Week 8 |
3085 |
3.78 |
1.63 |
3071 |
1.7 |
1.06 |
3125 |
2.75 |
1.98 |
3175 |
1.1 |
2.67 |
Table 1: Results of Prolactin Levels at Endpoint.