Development and Validation of High-Performance Thin-Layer Chromatography Method for Estimation of Teneligliptin in Bulk and in Pharmaceutical Formulation
Prafulla M Patil*, Pritam S
Jain, Sanjay J Surana, Swati D Yeole
Citation: Patil PM, Jain PS, Surana SJ, Yeole SD (2017) Development and Validation of High-Performance Thin-Layer Chromatography Method for Estimation of Teneligliptin in Bulk and in Pharmaceutical Formulation. Arch Nat Med Chem: ANMC-108. DOI:10.29011/ANMC-108.000008
A high-performance thin layer chromatographic method for determination of Teneligliptin was developed and validation as per ICH guidelines. HPTLC separation was performed on aluminum plates precoated with silica gel 60F254 and Methanol: Toluene: Triethylamine (1:3:1% v/v) as optimized mobile phase at detection wavelength of 245 nm. The retardation factor (Rf) value for Teneligliptin were 0.63 respectively. Accuracy for the marketed formulation were found to be 98.31-100.51%. The percent relative standard deviation for repeatability and intermediate precision studies was found to be < 2%. The propose development HPTLC method can be applied for identification and quantitative determination of Teneligliptin.
1.
Introduction
Teneligliptin is chemically {(2s,4s)-4-[4-(3-Methyl-1-phenyl-1-H pyrazole-5-yl) piperazin-1-yl] pyrrolidin-2-yl}(1,3-thiazolidin-3-yl) methanone (Figure1), having molecular formula: C22H28N6OS, with a molecular mass of 309.40 g/mol. It is a white fine powder which is freely soluble in water, sparingly soluble in methanol, slightly soluble in ethanol, and insoluble in acetonitrile. Teneligliptin is a Type-2 diabetis mellitus drug that belongs to dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors or “Gliptins”. DPP-4 inhibitor degradation, increasing the concentration of active GLP-1 in the blood, which stimulates glucose dependent insulin secretion and at the same time, suppresses glucagon secretion, thereby exhibiting a glucose lowering effect [1].
Various method is
reported for the analysis of individual drug as HPLC and LC MS/MS but no HPTLC method
is reported estimation of drug in pharmaceutical dosage form [2-7]. The objective of this research work was
therefore to develop a simple, rapid, precise and accurate HPTLC method for quantitative
analysis of Teneligliptin to validation the method in accordance with ICH
guidelines [8,9].
2.3.1. 2.3.1. Precision: Repeatability of sample application and measurement of peak area were carried out using six replicates of the same spot (2000 ng per spot of teneligliptin). The intra-day and inter-day precision for the determination of teneligliptin was carried out at three different concentration levels of 1000, 2000 and 2500 ng per spot.
2.3.2. 2.3.2 Recovery: Recovery studies were carried out by applying the method to drug samples, in which known amount of teneligliptin correspondence to 80, 100 and 120% were spiked. For each stated level, six determinations were performed
2.3.3. Robustness: The robustness of an analytical procedure refers to its capability to remain unaffected by small and deliberate variation in various parameters.
2.3.4. Ruggedness: Ruggedness of the method was checked by analyzing 2000 ng (n=6) if teneligliptin with the help of two analysts and the variations in the results were checked.
2.4. Limit of Detection and Limit of Quantification: To determine detection and quantification limit, teneligliptinin the lower levels of the linear range of the calibration curve were use. Teneligliptin solution of 500, 600, 700, 800, 900 and 1000 ng/spot were applied in triplicate. The amount of teneligliptin versus average response (peak area) were plotted in a linear regression equation was determined. The standard deviation of responses was calculated. The average of standard deviation was calculated. Detection limit was calculated by (3.3ХA.S.D)/b and quantification limit was calculated by (10ХA.S.D.)/b, where “b” corresponds to the slope obtained in the linearity study of method.
2.5. Application of Proposed Method to Tablet Formulation: Twenty Teneza 20mg tablet were accurately weighed, average weight determined and crushed into fine powder. A quantity of powdered drug equivalent to 10 mg of teneligliptin was transferred into 100 mL volumetric flask containing 80 mL methanol, shaken manually for 15 min; volume was adjusted to mark using same solvent. The solution was then filtered through Whatmann filter paper no.41. An appropriate concentration 2000 ng/spot of teneligliptin was spotted on TLC plates. The plates were developed and scanned as described above. The concentration of the drug was assessed from the linearity curve.
3. Result and Discussion
3.1.
Development of
optimum mobile phase: Different ratios of methanol, toluene and triethylaminewere tried
as mobile phase was tried but, tailing of spot, less persistent spots were
observed in most of the attempts. In order to overcome the problems, methanol:
toluene: triethylamine (1:3.1 v/v/v)
was tried and result is good resolution, sharp and symmetrical peak with Rf value of 0.63 for teneligliptin.
3.2. Calibration curve: The
linear regression data for the calibration curves showed good linear
relationship over the concentration range 500-3000 ng/spot (Figure 2), (Figure 3).
3.3. Method validation
3.3.1.
Precision: The repeatability of sample application and measurement of peak area were
expressed in terms of %R.S.D. and results are depicted in (Table 2). The intra and inter-day variation of teneligliptin
at three different concentration levels of 1000, 2000 and 2500 ng per spot was to
be <2%.
3.3.2.
Recovery: The proposed method when used for extraction and estimation of teneligliptin
from pharmaceutical dosage form after spiking with 80, 100 and 120% of
additional drug afforded recovery of 98.31-100.51% as listed in (Table 3).
3.3.3. Robustness studies: The robustness of the method was established by introducing small changes in mobile phase composition and chromatograms were run. The amount of mobile phase, chamber saturation time, time from spotting to chromatography and from chromatography to scanning (±10 min). The %RSD calculated as shown in (Table 4).
3.3.4.
Ruggedness: Ruggedness of the method was pre-formed by applying 2000 ng for teneligliptin,
respectively by two different analyst keeping same experimental and
environmental conditions. The results summarized in (Table
5).
3.3.5.
LOD and LOQ: The S/N 3:1 and 10:1 was considered as LOD and LOQ. The LOD and LOQ were
found to be 67.42 and 204.42.the result summarized in (Table
6).
3.4.
Analysis of tablet
formulation: A single spot at Rf
0.63 was observed in the chromatogram of the drug sample extracted from
tablets. There was no interference from the excipients commonly present in the
tablet. The %drug content and %RSD were calculated. The low %RSD value
indicated the suitability of this method for the routine analysis of
teneligliptin in pharmaceutical dosage forms (Table 7).
4. Conclusion
The
proposed HPTLC methods have been developed and successfully validated for
quantitative estimation of teneligliptin in tablet dosage form and in bulk drug.
The results of the validation tests indicated that the developed methods were
accurate, precise, robust and reproducible. Hence, the developed HPTLC methods
are suitable for routine determination of Teneligliptin in pharmaceutical
formulation inquality control laboratories, where economy and time are essential.
Figure 1: Chemical structures of Teneligliptin.
Figure 2: Calibration curve of Teneligliptin Area Vs ng/ml.
Figure 3: 3-D linearity chromatogram of Teneligliptin.
Concentration (ng/band) |
Mean peak area ± SD |
%RSD |
500 |
683.6 ± 21.56 |
0.848 |
1000 |
1283.6 ± 15.55 |
0.870 |
1500 |
1852.6 ± 15.69 |
0.847 |
2000 |
2363.5 ± 13.43 |
0.359 |
2500 |
2843.9 ± 20.36 |
0.716 |
3000 |
3347.5 ± 13.85 |
0.215 |
Table 1: Linearity of teneligliptin.
Concentration ng/band (n=3) |
Intra-day Amount found Area ±SD |
%RSD |
Inter-day Amount found Area ± SD |
%RSD |
1000 |
1272.7 ± 4.06 |
0.31926 |
1274.6 ± 7.20 |
0.565 |
2000 |
2369.23 ± 3.30 |
0.13963 |
2373.6 ± 5.51 |
0.232 |
2500 |
2840.97 ± 1.53 |
0.05388 |
2831.7 ± 7.76 |
0.274 |
Table 2: Precision study.
% Amount |
Initial Amount (ng/band) |
Amount Added (ng/band) |
% Recovery (N=3) |
%Rsd |
80 |
2000 |
1600 |
98.31 |
0.281 |
100 |
2000 |
2000 |
96.63 |
0.428 |
120 |
2000 |
2400 |
100.58 |
0.127 |
Table 3: Recovery study.
Parameters |
± SD of peak area ( n=3) |
% RSD |
Mobile phase composition (± 0.5 mL) |
8.712 |
0.489 |
Mobile phase volume (± 5ml) |
13.28 |
0.603 |
Duration of saturation (± 5 min.) |
35.46 |
0.932 |
Table 4: Robustness study.
Analyst |
Peak area ± SD |
%RSD |
1 |
2371.18 ± 8.988 |
0.379 |
2 |
2369.62 ± 9.716 |
0.410 |
Table 5: Ruggedness study.
LOD (ng/band) |
LOQ (ng/band) |
67.46 |
204.42 |
Table 6: LOD and LOQ.
Conc. (ng/band) |
Amount found area (ng/band) |
%Amount found |
%RSD |
2000 |
2196.34 |
109.817 |
0.340 |
Table 7: Analysis of tablet formulation.
4.
Reddy BR, Rao NV,
Saraswathi K (2014) Stability indicating RP-HPLC method for development and
validation of teneligliptinhydrobromide hydrate in pure and tablet dosage forms.
International Jouranal of Advances in Pharmaceutical Research 1: 310-318.
5.
Kumar TG, Vidyadhara S,
Narkhede NA, Silpa YS, Lakshmi MR (2016) Method development, validation, and
stability studies of teneligliptin by RP-HPLC and identification of degradation
products by UPLC tandem mass spectroscopy. Journal of Analytical Science and Technology 7:
27.
8.
I.C.H. Guidelines
(1995) Validation of analytical procedures: text and methodology. Q2 (R1) 1: 11260.
9.
I.C.H. Guidelines
(1997) Validation of analytical procedures: text and methodology. Q2
(R1) 1: 27463.