Hydrocele of Canal of Nuck - A Rare Entity
Aditi S Agrawal1*, Imran Shaikh2, Ashok Singhal3
1Consultant
General and Laparoscopy Surgeon, Wockhardt Hospitals, India
2Consultant
GI and Hepatobiliary Surgeon, Wockhardt Hospitals, India
3Consultant Radiodiagnostics, Wockhardt Hospitals, India
*Corresponding author:Aditi S Agrawal, Consultant General and Laparoscopy Surgeon, Wockhardt Hospitals, Mira Road, Thane, India. Tel: +919960041386;+919029619300; Email: draditiagrawal@gmail.com.
Received Date: 21October, 2017; Accepted Date: 15November, 2017; Published Date: 22November, 2017
Citation:Agrawal AS, Shaikh I, Singhal A (2017) Hydrocele of Canal of Nuck - A Rare Entity. J Urol Ren Dis 2017: 161. DOI: 10.29011/2575-7903.000161
1. Introduction
The canal of Nuck is a small evagination of the
parietal peritoneum, which is attached to the uterus by the round ligament
through the internal inguinal ring into the inguinal canal. It is
analogous/homologous to the PPV as seen in males. Incomplete
obliteration of the PPV causes indirect inguinal hernia or hydrocele of the
canal of Nuck, a very rare condition in females. It is analogous to hydrocele
of spermatic cord in males. This entity is a differential diagnosis in females
with inguinal swelling. We present a case in a 32-year-old female along with
detail approach to such cases along with review of literature. To our
knowledge, till date only three case reports of laparoscopic repair of
hydrocele of canal of nuck are published, ours being the fourth.Hydrocele of
the canal of Nuck is a rare entity and commonly mistaken for inguinal hernia as
one-third of thecases present concomitantly [1]. Round ligament is attached to the uterus and a small invagination
of the parietal peritoneum accompanies the round ligament through the inguinal
ring into the inguinal canal in all females [2]. This small invagination of the parietal peritoneum is the canal of
Nuck in the female, which is homologous to the PPV in males. It is normally
obliterated in the first year of life. Failure to achieve complete obliteration
results in an indirect inguinal hernia or if fluid is retained, it forms a
hydrocele of the Canal of Nuck[2,3]. First described by the Dutch anatomist Anton Nuck in 1691[4].
1. Case Report
32-year-old multipara lady (mother of 2 children) presented to our
OPD with discomfort and reducible swelling in the right inguinolabial region
which persisted for six months.Clinically, on right inguinal side there was an
irreducible buldge with absent cough impulse.Swelling was transillumination
positive.There were no superadded signs of inflammation. We examined the
patient in standing and supine position but did not notice any change. Pelvic
sonography revealed cystic mass in the retroperitoneal region with non-visibility
of the same side ovary (Figure 1).
On Valsalva manoeuvre, no appreciable changes were noted. Owing to difficulty in diagnosis, we performed CT-scan pelvis which was inconclusive. MRI pelvis depicted a cystic swelling in the retroperitoneal region with no peritoneal communication. However, confusion about the same side ovary persisted (Figure 2,3).
With a differential diagnosis of sliding inguinal hernia with ovary as a content and hydrocele of canal of nuck we performed diagnostic laparoscopy which revealed normal ovary on both the sides. Entire sac containing the cystic swelling i.e. Hydrocele of canal of Nuck was dissected (Figure 4).
It was type 1-hydrocele of canal of nuck. 2 loops of catgut were placed on it and the specimen was extracted through 10 mm trocar and sent for histopathology followed by mesh repair (TAPP). Histopathology confirmed our diagnosis of hydrocele of canal of nuck.
2. Discussion
The common differentials are an indirect inguinal hernia, a cold abscess, hematoma, rarely cystic lymphangioma, neuroblastoma, metastasis to the groin and ganglion cyst [5]. In less than one-third of the patients, visceral structures may be prolapsed within the patent sac, urinary bladder being the commonest [6]. Ovary alone or along with fallopian tubes is the content in 15-20% cases [7]. It may undergo rapid torsion leading to infarction. Once diagnosed to have an ovary in the sac, surgery should be performed early. The developmental defect causing hernia of the ovary into the canal of Nuck is interesting as it mimics thenormal descent of the testes in the male. The gubernaculum of the ovary, which is attached to the cornu of theuterus, prevents the descent of the ovary into the inguinal canal in normal development. When this mechanism isdefective, the gubernaculum may pull the ovary down into the canal of Nuck and, in some cases, into the labiummajus[8]. Dysfunction of the female gubernacula probably results in female genital tract malformations [7].
Hydrocele of canal of nuck is of 3 types [9]. Commonest type corresponds to encysted hydrocele of the cord in male i.e. one with no communication with the peritoneal cavity forming an encysted fluid collection. Second type corresponds to communicating hydrocele in male i.e. persistent communication with the peritoneal cavity. Third type is a combination of the two i.e. inguinal rings constricting the hydrocele like a belt so that a part is communicating, and part is enclosed - hour glass type. These cases are rare in adult females [8,10]. Clinical suspicion is must preoperatively, however most of them are diagnosed intraoperatively. Clinical differentiation between hydrocele of canal of Nuck and inguinal hernia is difficult. However, cyst is prominent while standing and remains visible while lying supine, unlike an inguinal hernia. With Valsalva manoeuvre, the cyst may recede into the inguinal canal while inguinal hernias will not [11]. Cough impulse may be absent in a cyst [12]. Hydroceles are usually painless, nonreducible and demonstrate trans illumination, in contrast to inguinal hernias [13]. If bowel sounds are heard over the swelling, then the diagnosis would be hernia.
Imaging helps to clinch diagnosis. Ultrasound shows a thin walled,
well defined, hypoechoic or echo free, cystic structure which may vary from an
anechoic, tubular, sausage, dumbbell or comma-shaped, “Cyst within a cyst”
appearance to a multicystic hydrocele [2,8,13]. Inguinal or Femoral hernias, mostly have a hyper echoic component
protruding out of the hernial orifice into the sac (omentum or intestine) and
vary with Valsalva manoeuvre. Colour Doppler does not show any vascularity in
cases of hydrocoele of canal of Nuck. The graded compression technique, which
can provide retrograde leakage, may help show the proximal canal as an
indicator of the origin of the cyst. On MRI, the hydrocele appears as a simple
cyst characterized as hypointense on T1-weighted images and hyperintense on
T2-weighted images [14]. MRI
can give more precise details regarding septation, communication between cystic
lesion and peritoneal cavity and the anatomical relation with adjacent
structures [14]. Therefore, MRI is a better investigation
to diagnose patients with inguinal cystic mass.
Management is excision of the cyst and closure of the enlarged
inguinal ring is usually performed through the inguinal canal by an anterior
approach i.e. open surgery. In the present case, diagnostic laparoscopy confirmed
the diagnosis and subsequent repair was done by Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP)
approach (Table 1).
Post operatively, patient recovered well and was discharged on
post-operative day 2. She has been on a follow up for 2 years and has neither
developed recurrence nor a similar swelling on other side. Robotic surgery has promising
results in urological surgery however there are no case reports related to
hernia.
Figure 1:(A &B) well defined
anechoic cystic lesion in right inguinal region without obviouscommunication
with peritoneal cavity. There was no flow at periphery on Doppler
interrogation(inB).
Figure 2:Sagittal T2W images of same patient showing lobulated contour.
Figure 3:Sagittal
T2W image of same patient showing lobulated contour.
Figure 4:Intraoperative presence of hydrocele of canal of nuck.
STUDY |
YEAR |
AGE |
PRESENTATION |
SIGNS |
MODE OF SURGERY |
Yen CF [15] |
2001 |
23 |
Detected during surgery for ovarian cyst |
|
Closure of patent canal of nuck with 1-0 polypropylene sutures |
Bunting D [16] |
2013 |
42 |
Painless swelling in inguinal region |
Reducible, cough impulse positive |
Detected intraoperatively, surgery postponed, and later patient refused |
Matsumoto [17] |
2014 |
37 |
Painless swelling in inguinal region |
Reducible |
Excision of hydrocele of canal of nuck as sac and TEPP repair |
Qureshi [18] |
2014 |
28 |
Painful swelling in inguinal region |
Cough impulse negative |
Excision of hydrocele of canal of nuck as sac and TAPP repair |
Present |
2015 |
32 |
Dragging pain and swelling in inguinal region |
Reducible, cough impulse negative |
Excision of hydrocele of canal of nuck as sac and TAPP repair |
Table 1:Summaries all cases of hydrocele of canal of nuck performed laparoscopically till date.
3.
Schwartz A and
Peyser MR (1975) Nuck's hydrocele (hydrocele muliebris) IntSurg60: 91-92.
6.
Weber T and Tracy T (1993) Groin hernias
and hydroceles. In: Pediatric Surgery. 2 nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders
Co562.
8.
Chandrasekharan LV and Rajagopal AS
(2006) The hydrocele of the canal of Nuck: An ultrasound diagnosis. Int J
Radiol 4:2.
11.
Patil SN and Bielamowicz K (2010)
Female hydrocele of canal of nuck. J Ark Med Soc 107:38e9.