1.       Introduction: 

One of the emerging field of science is a nanotechnology, which includes synthesis and development of various nanomaterials. The objects ranging in size from 1 to 100 nm is called as nanoparticles [1]. Nanotechnology changed the landscape of pharma industry. Targeting process and drug delivery is revolutionized by era of nanotechnology. Size range of nanoparticles affects the bioavailability and bio-distribution of particles, and hence it is useful as a drug carrier [2]. Nanoparticles offer great potential for delivering drug to targeted cell or organ. From the nanoparticles which are in development liposomes, albumin nanoparticles, ceramic nanoparticles, silica nanoparticles have been widely studied [3]. Because of the poor water solubility of many drugs they show low bioavailability. In some cases, during the development process resulting drug candidate being rejected. Mesoporous material based drug delivery system has been investigated to enhance solubility and thus improved bioavailability [4,5]. (Figure 1) Shows ideal characteristics of carrier for drug delivery.

Mes­oporous silica nanoparticles have been explored as effective drug delivery systems for a variety of therapeutic agents to fight against various kinds of diseases including bone/tendon tissue engineering, diabetes, inflammation, and cancer [6]. MSNs are used in controlled drug release systems, improve drug efficacy and reduce drug side effects. dye-doped imaging and detection, and intelligent anticorrosion coating, due to the performance characteristics of MSNs [7,8]. Mesoporous silica material discovered in 1992 in the labs of Mobil Oil Corporation [9,10] (Table 1 and 2).

Shawky SM et al developed a novel method for loading drugs into spherical mesoporous silicate nanoparticles and modified loaded MSNs to produce smart DDS. Rotary evaporation used as a novel method for preparation and loading of MSNs. loading efficiency compared with conventional impregnation loading method. It was found that loading efficiency of novel method was high as compare with conventional method [15]. 

2.       Theranostic Approach Nanoparticles

Characteristics of ideal vehicle for smart delivery system are:

·                     Vehicle should be traceable.

·                     Should accommodate large drug loads.

·                     Should be feature targeting.

·                     Delivery of cargo on-demand at the desired location due to smart release control mechanisms.

If drug is efficiently delivered in needed location only at exact timely manner and the exact dosage, a large increase in the efficiency of a drug is observe; because of this associated side effects is also decrease [20]. For obtaining both therapeutic and diagnostic function from single molecular entity, development of theranostic nanoparticles have increased continuously during the last couple of years term “Theranostic” [21]. The hexagonal nanochannels/pores, silica framework, and particle exterior are the three topologically distinct regions of MSNs that can be independently functionalized and are particularly well suited for the theranostic applications with separate domains available for;

·                     Contrast agents, for traceable imaging of diagnostic targeting.

·                     Drug payloads, for therapeutic intervention.

·                     Biomolecular ligands, for highly targeted delivery of both platform and conveyed cargo [22,23].

Over traditional molecular agents, nanoparticulate agents will have include the following characteristics;

·                     Nanoparticles provide a fluorescent nanoplatform on which targeting agents (small molecules, antibodies, peptides) can be substituted or added.

·                     For multimodality imaging such as (optical, magnetic resonance, and radionuclide).

·                     For both imaging and therapeutic abilities (“theranostic” nanoparticles) they can be functionalized.

·                     For providing salutary benefits related to pharmacokinetics by exclusive renal excretion they can be designed.

·                     They have sufficient size to permit multivalency and, therefore, the potential for higher affinity binding than standard agents.

·                     They enable imaging from the single cell level to the entire, intact organism in vivo [24].

In recent decades, new bioactive molecules are discovered due to the development of new techniques and synthetic strategies, the researchers have tried to extend their knowledge on developing new drug delivery nanocarriers. From these vehicles, “Nanoinorganic” systems have been studied both for therapeutic and diagnostic purposes [25] (Figure 2).

Drug delivery system along with therapeutic agent would thereby be delivered to interior of given cell, these drug delivery systems will not only have important therapeutic and pharmacological action but also be of great interest for medical imaging and diagnosis [26]. For more specific and personalized disease management the multifunctional nanosystems such as theranostic nanoparticles are prepared by combining diagnostic and therapeutic capabilities into one single biocompatible and biodegradable nanoparticle.

Ideal theranostic nanoparticles must contain following characteristics;

·                     Should be safe.

·                     Selectively and rapidly accumulate in target(s) of interest.

·                     Without damaging healthy organs, efficiently deliver a sufficient amount of drug(s) on demand.

·                     Report biochemical and morphological characteristics of disease.

·                     It should be cleared from body within hours or biodegraded into nontoxic by products [27,28].

Theranostic was coined to define ongoing efforts in clinics to develop more individualized, specific therapies for various diseases [29]. By surface chemical modification, nanoparticles can be coated, functionalized, and integrated with a variety of bioconjugated moieties for selective detection and treatment [30-33] (Figure 3).

3.       Hybrid Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles for Cancer

Cancer may be defined as clinical stage where a mutant group of cells divides in an uncontrolled manner and invades neighboring tissues that finally destroy the whole cellular system [34]. Second cause of death in the United States is cancer which is responsible for 595,690 deaths in 2016. Due to clinical limitations of traditional approaches such as surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy the diagnosis and treatment of this deadly disease are challenging. Some of the major issues related to the treatment of cancer are overcome by utilization of hybrid nano-materials. Multi drug resistance, detrimental side effects, and metastasis are the greatest challenges in cancer treatment today [35-36] (Figure 4). Hybrid nanostructures with multifunctionality are the state-of-art of nano-biomedicine, wherein the majority of interest is associated with beneficial employment of multiple materials within a single system [37-39].

hMSNs possesses more advantages because the versatility with which the silica scaffold can be functionalized, offering the possibility of independently modifying the internal pore structure and the external particle surface (Figure 5).

For the modulatation of the interactions with the cargo, internal pore functionalization is carried out and allows control over the stability, diffusional transport, and delivery kinetics of the therapeutic agents. Again, the formation of metastable crystalline forms or even prevent drug crystallization, increasing the molecular mobility and bioavailability of drugs with low water solubility is occur due to the confining effects of the (nanometer size) particle pores on drugs [20]. Yanzhuo Zhang et al developed MSNs loaded with a poorly water-soluble drug, intended to be orally administered, able to improve the dissolution rate and enhance the drug loading capacity. Spherical MSNs were synthesized using organic template method in an oil/water phase, and large pore diameter MSNs were functionalized with aminopropyl group through post synthesis. MSNs as well as functionalized MSNs were investigated as matrices for loading and release of model drug. The release rate of drug from MSNs with diameter 12.9nm was found to be effectively increased and release rate of drug from functionalized MSNs was effectively controlled compared with that from the unmodified MSNs [40].

4.       Surface Functionalization of MSNs:

A wide variety of ligands have been incorporated onto nanoparticle surfaces, allowing them to be used in sensing of biomolecules and cells, diagnosis of diseases, and intracellular delivery [40]. MSNs contain high density of surface silanol groups. These groups can be modified with a wide range of organic functional groups. In biomedical applications of MSNs surface functional groups play several roles:

·                     For controlling the surface charge of MSNs.

·                     To chemically link with functional molecules inside or outside the pores.

·                     To control the size of pore entrance for entrapping molecules in the nanopores.

Surface functionalization of MSNs carried out by three methods: surfactant displacement methods, co-condensation, and post-synthesis grafting [23,42]. Amit Dubey et al. developed the mild acidic nanocatalyst, ordered mesoporous silica, chloroacetic acid functionalized SBA -15 via post synthetic grafting technique useful for acidic conversions such as Knoveneganel condensation, Mannich reaction and Biginelli synthesis. very high activity and selectivity was observed for all the conversions under milder reaction conditions [43]. Shattering of mesoporous silica by sonication, resulting in an improved intramesoporous structure. With sonication-shattered mesoporous silica, a much higher protein loading density can be achieved, which may allow more sustained protein drug release [44].  Guilan Qual et al. emphasized that, targeting property of lactose was integrated with the excellent drug delivery and endocytotic behaviors of MSNs to build a novel drug delivery system. Docetaxel was selected as a model drug, and fluorescein isothiocyante was used as a dye for the tracking to determine where the corgo will released. It is observed that the corgo loaded in MSNs with surface functionalization with lactose (hMSNs) show sustained drug release over a long period of time as compare with corgo loaded in MSNs without surface functionalization [45].

5.       Stimuli Responsive Drug Release by hMSNs

Stimuli-responsive mechanism is a vital part of a DDS, which determines whether the DDS is endowed with controlled release functions. Relevant stimuli signals and release mechanisms are the part on which accurate design of a controlled release behavior should be based. DDS which respond to pH [46,47], temperature [48-50], light [51,52], redox state [53-57], magnetic field [58], biomolecules [59-61] or a combination of them is developed and confirmed. These stimuli signals are mainly divided into two main types: internal stimuli and external stimuli. Heterogeneities in pH value, redox state, types and amounts of biomolecules are seen due to the tremendous intracellular environment differences between tumor tissues and normal tissues. However, external stimuli are equally important, they play very significant role by applying extra stimuli at the disease location [62]. Maximum therapeutic efficacy can be realized by using stimuli-responsive targeted DDS that can effectively reach specific target sites without drug leakage on the way [63,64].

Following are the characteristics of ideal stimuli responsive Nano systems:

·                     Recognize tumor microenvironment in high selective manner.

·                     Allow for precise release in response to exogenous or endogenous stimulus [65].

In Recent year extensive attention is received by the stimuli-responsive nanomaterials for cancer treatment, and now a day this becomes a principal field in medical research. In case of cancer therapy, for achieving the complete eradication of tumors; the anticancer drugs must be administered systematically in high doses for insurance of sufficient and sustained therapy. Sustained drug delivery systems will cause severe side-effects due to the nonspecific uptake of anticancer drugs by healthy tissues/organs such as bone marrow, liver, kidney, and heart before reaching the targeted organs or tissues. Therefore, to solve this problem, it is highly desirable to design stimuli-responsive controlled drug delivery systems [66]. Recently more attention has drawn by stimuli responsive DDS based on mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs) because of some unique properties of MSNs such as extremely large surface area and pore volume which could accommodate drug molecules within the pore channels with a high payload, and the easily modified surface facilitate the attachment of different kinds of “gate-keeper” on the outlets of pore to control the release of drug [67,68]. Stimuli-responsive molecules, polymers, nanoparticles and proteins are used for the functionalization of surface of mesoporous silica nanoparticles which acting as caps and gatekeepers for such a controlled release of various cargos (Figure 6) (Table 3).

Effective protection from undesired degradation in harsh environments, such as the stomach and intestines is required for the delivery of antitumor drugs and other pharmaceutical cargos such as enzymes or oligonucleotides requires [69]. In the past decade Stimuli-responsive MSNs have been developed to achieve controlled drug delivery, however, in most cases MSNs were used as rigid building blocks to load drug molecules [70]. Marina Martinez-Carmona explained that, to prevent the premature release of the cargo entrapped in the mesoporous, it is feasible to cap the pore entrances using stimuli-responsive nanogates. Because of this upon exposure to external or internal stimuli, the pore opening takes place and the release of the entrapped cargo occurs. and also describe the cargo release in a needed location only due to targeting therapy by hMSNs. In another case if this type of therapy is not used, then the corgo will reaches to all circulation within body [11].

5.1.  pH

For effective delivery of anticancer drugs pH-sensitive Nano systems are expected to store and stabilize the drug at physiological pH, rapidly release the drug when the pH trigger point is reached, and ensure that the intracellular drug concentration reaches the therapeutic dose [72]. In case of healthy tissues and tumors, intracellular pH is same; however extracellular pH of tumors is less when compared to healthy tissue. Generally, the average extracellular tumor pH is 6.0-7.0, in case of healthy tissue pH are 7.4.

pH sensitive nanocarriers are classified into three types;

·                     Polymeric nanocarriers such as (polymer-drug conjugates, nanogels, micelles and core-shell polymeric nanoparticles)

·                     Liposomes

·                     Inorganic nanoparticles

Various types of anionic and cationic polymers are used in pH sensitive drug release such as Poly (aspartic acid) (PASP), Poly(acrylic acid)(PAA), Poly(ethyl acrylic acid) (PEAA) and Poly(methacrylic acid)(PMAA), 3- methylglutarylated poly (glycidol), Poly(β-amino ester), poly(L-histidine) [73].

5.2.  Redox

Intracellular microenvironment of tumor tissue is differing than as normal tissue, such as over expressed GSH (2-10 mM). This biological feature can be used to design redox sensitive nanoparticles. mostly drug or gene delivery have received increasing interest over the past years. Cellular reductive microenvironment is regulated by tripeptide GSH. The level of GSH in intracellular compartments is 2-10 mM, which are generally 100-1000 times higher than that in human and blood. However, the cytosolic GSH level in some tumor cells has been found to be at least four times higher than in normal cells. Possibility of designing GSH sensitive NPs is developed by sharp differences in GSH levels between tumor and normal cells. After cellular uptake by disulfide cleavage NPs with GSH sensitive mechanisms can promote intracellular drug or gene delivery, and this then regulate the intracellular fates of delivered drugs and genes [74,75].

5.3.  Temperature

Due to Tumors, inflammation, or infection processes moderate temperature increases up to 4-5^°C. A temperature-responsive controlled release system is design by grafting temperature-sensitive Nano-switch on the surface of MSNs. Commonly used temperature-sensitive polymers are based on Poly-N-Isopropylacrylamide (PNIPAM) and its derivatives, these polymers exhibit a hydrophilic extended state below lower critical solution temperature which creates a diffusion bottleneck that hampers the drug release. Water is excluded from these polymers when the temperature is higher than the lower critical solution temperature, which collapse to release the loaded drug. The internal surface of the MSNs as modified through atom transfer radical polymerization by Lopez and coworkers, who confirmed that the PNIPAM-functionalized MSNs can release drugs at a high temperature (50^oC), and inhibit the release of drugs at a low temperature (25^oC). On the basis of this phenomenon, the team constructed a temperature-responsive controlled release system [8,76].

5.4.  Enzyme

The design of nanomaterials is a developing arena in stimuli-responsive “smart” nanomaterials, whose chemical structures and/or physical properties are responsive to the biocatalytic action of an enzyme. In all the biological and metabolic processes enzymes play critical roles and the pathology of many diseases is underpins by dysregulation of enzyme expression and activity. In case of the therapeutics, dysregulated enzymes are promising biological triggers. When we use exploiting enzymes as a trigger these enzyme shows a number of advantages because most enzymes catalyze chemical reactions under mild conditions (low temperature, neutral pH, and buffered aqueous poly-N-isopropylacrylamide solutions, where many conventional chemical reactions fail. Enzymes can also possess exceptional selectivity for their substrates, allowing for specific, sophisticated, biologically inspired chemical reactions [77].

Following are some unique properties of enzyme;

·                     Isoelectric pH

·                     Exquisite substrate specificity

·                     Greater expression in particular organs and in sub-cellular organelles

·                     Large changes in concentration, in inflammation and disease states

In intracellular delivery proteases plays critical role and matrix metalloproteinases is specific for the cancer microenvironment. In inflammation stage concentration of elastase is increased and while in case of pancreatic cancer phospholipases are over-expressed and can be used for antibiotic delivery. Oxidoreductases also are taken advantage of oxidase-responsive DDS. By using these different enzymes MSNs can be tailored by changing the linkers and capping agents on their functionalized surface [49].

5.5.  Ultrasound

Spatiotemporal control of the drug release at the desired site is achieved by Ultrasounds (US), ultrasound having following characteristics;

·                     Non-invasiveness

·                     Absence of ionizing radiations

·                     Cost effectiveness

·                     Easy regulation of tissue penetration depth by tuning the frequency cycles and exposure time

This high-frequency ultrasound allows local therapy and can penetrate deep into the body with focused beams due to this, adverse side effects to healthy tissues is avoided. Ultrasound stimulus enhances nanoparticles extravasation through blood capillaries and induce immune response against tumors and also increase cell membrane permeation [78-80].

5.6.  Magnetic

In magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic targeting, magnetic mesoporous silica nanoparticles used to deliver photosensitizer to the target site using the magnetic targeting technology. This used to trace and guide drug delivery in vivo. However, combined with the advantages of mesoporous materials, including large pore size, large specific surface area, stable structure and modifiable inner surface; Magnetic mesoporous silica nanoparticle exert good drug-loading capacity and biocompatibility as reported [81-83]. It is believed that the combination of magnetic mesoporous silica nanocomposites with stimuli-responsive component in a single nanovesicle can potentially construct a delivery system with the ability to control the location, time, and amount of drug released [84]. Magnetic hyperthermia treatment is a cancer therapy that relies on the heat produced by magnetic nanoparticles under an alternating current magnetic field and this has the potential to realize a scar less, local, and economical treatment with minimum side effects [85-88].

6.       Stability of MSNs

Particle size and particle size distribution, morphology and orientation of the porous structure, surface area, pore diameters and chemical purity are the properties of porous silica micro or nanoparticles that need to be immediately checked after their synthesis. These parameters play a crucial role in determining the hydrothermal, colloidal, suspension and dispersion stability of the particles. Surface properties affects the total charges, particle-particle interactions, suspension stability and thermal properties of the porous particles [86]. Nanoparticles drug loading capacity, colloidal stability, and interactions with loaded drugs are related to their physico-chemical properties and are important for a functional drug delivery device. Overestimation of the silica nanoparticles responsible for the aggregation of particles [90]. Rahul Bagwe et al studied the effect of surface functionalization on MSNs for reduction of aggregation. For Preparation of uniform fluorescent dye-doped silica nanoparticles of the desired size and surface, a water-in-oil microemulsion-based surface modification method has been used. Colloid stability studies, based on the zeta potential and particle size indicate that the addition of proper ratios of inert functional groups (e.g. methyl phosphonate) to active functional groups (e.g. amino groups) to the surface of silica nanoparticles results in a highly negative zeta potential, this is necessary to keep the particles well disperse [91]. Younwoo Nam et al. developed phosphate-modified mesoporous silica nanoparticles with large pores over 10nm were synthesized successfully and the phosphate- modified mesoporous silica nanoparticles were observed to be very effective in disrupting F127 block copolymer aggregates induced by Mn²⁺ [92].

7.       Applications of MSNs                                                                                                     

7.1.  As a Drug Delivery System

7.1.1.         Immediate Drug Delivery Systems Based on Msns: Many hydrophobic drugs have poor water solubility and limited applications which results in poor absorption in the gastrointestinal tract after oral dosing [93]. As compared with other types of carriers, immediate drug delivery system based MSNs have unique features. Drugs are encapsulated with a high payload due to large surface area and high pore volume. The mesoporous channels keep drugs in the amorphous or non-crystalline state within the pores, which facilitates drug dissolution. However, the marked chemical stability and inert behavior allow for better control of drug loading and release.

7.1.2.         Sustained Drug Delivery Systems Based on MsnsL: In case of immediate drug delivery systems frequent administration is necessary and it cannot provide long-term drug release. Therefore, there is a significant advantage of dosage form offering sustained release because sustained release is able to maintain a steady blood concentration for a prolonged period of time. For sustained drug delivery several MSNs used have been categorized into two groups: unmodified and modified silica materials [94].

7.1.3.         MSN-Based Targeted Drug Delivery Systems: For targeted drug delivery systems MSNs have emerged as appealing candidates. By the Enhanced Permeation and Retention (EPR) effect MSNs with a particle size in the nanoscale range can accumulate in tumor tissues [95]. However specific drug delivery can be achieved via active targeting by decorating MSNs with targeting ligands such as folate [96,97]. MSNs acting as homing devices by conjugating the peptides, antibodies and magnetic materials on surface [98-101]. In the targeting process, the surface modification of MSNs and particle size critically influence particle pharmacokinetics and bio-distribution [102].

7.1.4.         MSN-Based Stimuli-Responsive Controlled Drug Delivery Systems: Chemical design and synthesis of stimuli-responsive drug carriers are the promising approach to mitigate the systemic toxicity and enhance the therapeutic outcome of therapeutic agents [103]. stimuli-responsive MSNs are developed by applying controls such as ‘gatekeepers’ over the pore entrance. Until the drug-loading system is exposed to external stimuli, such as pH, redox potential, temperature, photo irradiation, or enzyme; the drug cannot leak out from silica carriers. These stimuli remove the gatekeepers [94]. Due to the pH gradients that are present in different tissues and subcellular compartments pH-responsive controlled drug delivery systems have been widely investigated, among the various stimuli-responsive drug delivery systems [104].

7.2.  Another Application of MSNs (Figure 7)

8.       Conclusion

The mesoporous silica nanoparticles are the emerging field for smart drug delivery. Theranostic approach of hybrid mesoporous silica nanoparticles used for combine diagnostic and treatment. Its various features such as stability, uniform pore structure, high surface area, tunable pore size and well-defined surface properties make it ideal carrier for therapy. Stimuli response is achieving for localization of corgo to a particular approach towards the effective and specific drug cancer cells. Targeting therapy is possible by using hybrid mesoporous silica nanoparticles.

9.       Acknowledgement

We are grateful to principal, management of Sanjivani College of Pharmaceutical Education and Research Kopargaon, Mpharm department of pharmaceutics, for their valuable support for this paper.

Figure 1: Ideal Characteristics of Carrier for Drug Delivery.

Figure 2: Shows scheme describing the combination of both therapeutic and diagnostic functions into theranostic nanomedicine.

Figure 3: Bio-distribution and Biocompatibility of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles.

Figure 4: Shows Hybrid Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles with A. Silica Core B. Organic Shell.

Figure 5: Advantages of hMSNs.

Figure 6: Stimuli Responsive Drug Release Mechanism Form Silica Nanoparticles.

Figure 7: Describe Application of MSNs.

Table 1: Advantage of MSNs [11-19].

Table 2: Various Types of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles with their Internal Structure and Pore Diameter [2].

1.                   Hasan S (2005) A review on nanoparticles: Their synthesis and types. Research Journal of Recent sciences 4: 9-11.

2.                   Bharti c, Nagaich U, Pal AK, Gulati N (2015) Mesoporous silica nanoparticles in target drug delivery system: A review. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation 5: 124-133.

3.                   Lu J, Liong M, Sherman S, Xia T, Kovochich M, et al. (2007) Mesoporous silica nanoparticles for cancer therapy: energy-dependent cellular uptake and delivery of paclitaxel to cancer cells. Nanobiotechnol 3: 89-95.

4.                   Borbane SA, Pande VV, Vibhute SK, Kendre PN, Dange UV (2015) Design and fabrication of ordered mesoporous alumina scaffold for drug delivery of poorly water-soluble drug. Austin Therapeutics 2: 1-5.

5.                    Speybroeck MV, Sarillaro V, Thi TD, Mellaerts R, Martens J, et al. (2009) Ordered mesoporous silica material sba-15: a broad-spectrum formulation platform for poorly soluble drugs. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 98: 2648-2658.

6.                   Tang F, Li L, Chen D (2012) Mesoporous silica nanoparticles: synthesis, biocompatibility and drug delivery. Advanced Materials 24: 1504-1534.

7.                   Regi MV (2012) Mesoporous silica nanoparticles: their projection in nanomedicine. International Scholarly Research Network materials science 2012: 1-20.

8.                   Sun R, Wang W, Wen Y, Zhang X (2015) Recent advance on mesoporous silica nanoparticles-based controlled release system: intelligent switches open up new horizon. Nanomaterials 5: 2019-2053.

9.                   Rashi S, Prajapati SK, Singh D (2015) Mesoporous silica nanoparticles for controlled drug delivery. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences 4: 332-347.

10.                Wei L, Hu N, Zhang Y (2010) Synthesis of polymer-mesoporous silica nanocomposites. Materials 3: 4066-4079.

11.                Carmona MM, Colilla M, Regi MV (2015) Smart mesoporous nanomaterials for antitumor therapy. Nanomaterials 5: 1906-1937.

12.                Sun X (2012) Mesoporous silica nanoparticles for applications in drug delivery and catalysis. Graduate Theses and Dissertations 2012, Paper 12812. Iowa State University Ames, Iowa: 1-117.

13.                Huang X, Young NP, Townley HE (2014) Characterization and comparison of mesoporous silica particles for optimized drug delivery. Nanomaterials and Nanotechnology 4: 1-15.

14.                Jadhav KS, Dumbare PS, Pande VV (2015) Mesoporous silica nanoparticles (msn): a nanonetwork and hierarchical structure in drug delivery. Journal of Nanomedicine Research 2: 1-8.

15.                Shawky SM, AlHassan AA, Lill H, Bald D, Khamisy SF, et al. (2016) Efficient loading and encapsulation of anti-tuberculosis drugs using multifunctional mesoporous silicate nanoparticles. Journal of Nanosciences: Current Research 1: 1-9.

16.                Cao L, Zhang H, Cao C, Zhang J, Li F, et al. (2016) Quaternized chitosan-capped mesoporous silica nanoparticles as nanocarriers for controlled pesticide release. Nanomaterials 6: 126.

17.                 Ahuja G, Pathak K (2009) Porous carriers for controlled/modulated drug delivery. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 71: 599-607.

18.                Sponchia G, Marin R, Freris I, Marchiori M, Moretti E, et al. (2014) Mesoporous silica nanoparticles with tunable pore size for tailored gold nanoparticles. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 16: 1-14.

19.                Yao X, Tian Z, Liu J, Zhu Y, Hanagta N (2016) mesoporous silica nanoparticles capped with graphene quantum dots for potential chemo-photothermal synergistic cancer therapy. American chemical society 33: 591-599.

20.                Baleizo C, Farinha JPS (2015) Hybrid smart mesoporous silica nanoparticles for theranostics, the development of hybrid mesoporous silica nanoparticles for theranostics...Promises an exceptional platform for precision therapy and diagnosis, future medicine Ltd. Nanomedicine 2015: 1743-5889.

21.                Elgqvist J (2017) Nanoparticles as theranostic vehicles in experimental and clinical applications- focus on prostate and breast cancer. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 18: E1102.

22.                Chen N, Cheng S, Souris JS, Chen C, Mou C, et al. (2013) Theranostic applications of mesoporous silica nanoparticles and their organic/inorganic hybrids. Journal of Materials Chemistry B 1: 3128-3135.

23.                Wu S, Hung Y, Mou C (2011) Mesoporous silica nanoparticles as nanocarriers. ChemCommun 47: 9972-9985.

24.                Kumar R, Roy I, Ohulchanskyy TY, Goswami LN, Bonoiu AC, et al. (2008) Covalently dye-linked, surface- controlled, and bioconjugated organically modified silica nanoparticles as targeted probes for optical imaging. American Chemical Society Nano 2: 449-456.

25.                Malfanti A, Miletto I, Bottinelli E, Zonari D, Blandino G, et al. (2016) Delivery of gemcitabine prodrugs employing mesoporous silica nanoparticles. Molecules 21: 522.

26.                Rosenholm JM, Meinander A, Peuhu E, Niemi R, Eriksson JE, et al. (2009) Targeting of porous hybrid silica nanoparticles to cancer cells. American Chemical Society Nano 3: 197-206.

27.                Chen F, Ehlerding EB, Cai W (2014) Theranostic nanoparticles. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 55: 1919-1922.

28.                Jokerst JV and Gambhir SS (2011) molecular imaging with theranostic nanoparticles. Accounts of Chemical Research 44: 1050-1060.

29.                Xie J, Lee S, Chen X (2010) Nanoparticle-based theranostic agents. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 62: 1064-1079.

30.                Fan Z, Fu PP, Yu H, Ray PC (2014) Theranostic nanomedicine for cancer detection and treatment. Journal of food and drug analysis 22: 3-7.

31.                Wang J, Tian S, Petros RA, Napier ME, DeSimone JM (2010)The complex role of multivalency in nanoparticles targeting the transferrin receptor for cancer therapies. Journal of American Chemical Society 132: 11306-11313.

32.                Park J, Maltzahn GV, Ong LL, Centrone A, Hatton TA, et al. (2010) Cooperative nanoparticles for tumor detection and photothermally triggered drug delivery. Advanced Materials 22: 880-885.

33.                Lal S, Clare SE, Halas NJ (2008) Nanoshell-enabled photothermal cancer therapy: impending clinical impact. Accounts of Chemical Research 41: 1842-1851.

34.                Dubey KK, Kumar P, Labrou NE, Shukla P (2017) Biotherapeutic potential and mechanisms of action of colchicines. Crit Rev Biotechnol 37: 1038-1047.

35.                Berrios MP, Cintron N, Lugo MR, Juneja R, Escoto JL (2016) Hybrid nanomaterials based on iron oxide nanoparticles and mesoporous silica nanoparticles: overcoming challenges in current cancer treatments. Journal of Chemistry 2016: 1-15.

36.                Tolentino ED, Centurion BS, Ferreira LH, souza AP, Damante JM, et al. (2011) Oral adverse effects of head and neck radiotherapy: care guideline for irradiated patients. Journal of Applied Oral Science 19: 448-454.

37.                Eltohamy M, Seo JW, Kundu B, Kim HW, Shin US (2017) Super-magnetic smart hybrid doxorubicin loaded nanoparticles effectively target breast adenocarcinoma cells. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials :1-21.

38.                Karni T, Langer R, Kohane DS (2012) The smartest materials: the future of nanoelectronics in medicine. American Chemical Society Nano 6: 6541-6545.

39.                Costi R, Saunders AE, Banin U (2010) Colloidal hybrid nanostructures: a new type of functional materials. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 49: 4878-4897.

40.                Zhang Y, Zhi Z, Jiang T, Zhang J, Wang Z, et al.  (2010) Spherical mesoporous silica nanoparticles for loading and release of the poorly water-soluble drug telmisartan. Journal of controlled release 145: 257-263.

41.                Mout R, Moyano DF, Rana S, Rotello VM (2012) Surface functionalization of nanoparticles for nanomedicine. Chemical Society Reviews 41: 2539-2544.

42.                Huh S, Wiench JW, Yoo J, Pruski M, Lin VS (2003) Organic functionalization and morphology control of mesoporous silicas via a co-condensation synthesis method. Chemistry of Materials 15: 4247-4256.

43.                Dubey A, Sachdev D, Srivasatava NM (2013) Synthesis, characterization and catalytic application of ordered mesoporous silica nanocomposites functionalized with chloroacetic acid (SBA-15/CA). Advanced Materials Letters 4: 39-45.

44.                Lei C, Chen B, Li X, Qi W, Liu J (2013) Non-destructively shattered mesoporous silica for protein drug delivery. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 175: 157-160.

45.                Quan G, Pan X, Wang Z, Wu Q, Li g, Dian L (2015) Lactosaminated mesoporous silica nanoparticles for asialoglyco protein receptor targeted anticancer drug delivery. Journal of nanobiotechnology 13: 1-12.

46.                Yang Y, Wang S, Wang Y, Wang X, Wang Q, et al. (2014) Advances in self-assembled chitosan nanomaterials for drug delivery. Biotechnology Advances 32: 1301-1316.

47.                Hu L, Sun Y, Wu Y (2013) Advances in chitosan-based drug delivery vehicles. Nanoscale 5: 3103-3111.

48.                Chen K, Liang H, Chen H, Wang Y, Cheng P, et al. (2013) A Thermoresponsive bubble-generating liposomal system for triggering localized extracellular drug delivery. American Chemical Society Nano 7: 438-446.

49.                Kurimi M, Mirshekari H, Aliakbari M, Zangabad PS, Hamblin MR (2015) Smart mesoporous silica release nanoparticles for controlled drug delivery. Nanotechnology Reviews 5: 1-26.

50.                Kakwere H, Leal MP, Materia ME, Curcio A, Guardia P, et al. (2015) Functionalization of strongly interacting magnetic nanocubeswith (thermo) responsive coating and their application in hyperthermia and heat-triggered drug delivery. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 7: 10132-10145.

51.                Lorenzo c, Bromberg L, Concheiro A (2009) light-sensitive intelligent drug delivery systems. Photochemistry and Photobiology 85: 848-860.

52.                Riedinger A, Guardia P, Curcio A, Garcia MA, Cingolani R, et al. (2013) Subnanometer local temperature probing and remotely controlled drug release based on azo-functionalized iron oxide nanoparticles. Nano Letters 13: 2399-2406.

53.                Li Z, Hu J, Xu Q, Chen S, Jia H, et al. (2013) A redox-responsive drug delivery system based on RGD containing peptide-capped mesoporous silica nanoparticles. Journal of Materials Chemistry B 3: 39-44.

54.                Jin S, Wan J, Meng L, Huang X, Guo J, et al. (2015) Biodegradation and toxicity of protease/Redox/pH stimuli-responsive PEGlated PMAA nanohydrogels for targeting drug delivery. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 7: 19843-19852.

55.                Noyhouzer T, L'Homme C, Beaulieu I, Mazurkiewicz S, Kuss S, et al. (2016) Ferrocene-modified Phospholipid: an Innovative Precursor for Redox- Triggered Drug Delivery Vesicles Selective to Cancer Cells. American Chemical Society 32: 4169-4178.

56.                Cao C, Zhao S, Yu Q, Liu Y, Zhou Y, et al. (2016) redox-responsive strategy using mesoporous silica nanoparticles for co-delivery of siRNA and doxorubicin. Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology, and Medicine 12: 477.

57.                Zhang p, Zhang H, He W, Zhao D, Song A, et al. (2016) Disulfide-linked amphiphilic polymer-docetaxel conjugates assembled redox-sensitive micelles for efficient antitumor drug delivery. Biomacromolecules 17: 1621-1632.

58.                Hayashi K, Ono K, Suzuki H, Sawada M, Moriya M, et al. (2010) High-frequency, magnetic-field-responsive drug release from magnetic nanoparticle/ organic hybrid based on hyperthermic effect. Applied Materials & Interfaces 2: 1903-1911.

59.                Climent E, Manez R, Sancenon F, Marcos MD, Soto J, et al. (2010) Controlled delivery using oligonucleotide-capped mesoporous silica nanoparticles. Angewandte Chemie 122: 7439-7441.

60.                Zhong J, Li L, Zhu X, Guan S, Yang Q, et al. (2015) A smart polymeric platform for multistage nucleus-targeted anticancer drug delivery. Biomaterials 65: 43-55.

61.                Li x, Haon, Chen H, Xu J (2014) Tumor-marker-mediated “on-demand” drug release and real-time monitoring system based on multifunctional mesoporous silica Nano-particles. Analytical Chemistry 86:10239-10245.

62.                Ding C, Tong L, Feng J, Fu J (2016) Recent advances in stimuli-responsive release function drug delivery systems for tumor treatment. Molecules 21: E1715.

63.                Zhao Q, Liu J, Zhu W, Sun C, Di D, et al. (2015) Dual-stimuli responsive hyaluronic acid-conjugated mesoporous silica for targeted delivery to CD44-overexpressing cancer cells. Acta Biomaterialia 23: 147-156.

64.                Chai S, Guo Y, Zhang Z, Chai Z, Ma Y, et al. (2017) Cyclodextrin-gated mesoporous silica nanoparticles as drug carriers for red light-induced drug release. Nanotechnology 28: 1-10.

65.                Wen J, Yang K, Xu Y, Li H, Liu F, et al. (2016) Construction of a triple-stimuli-responsive system based on cerium oxide coated mesoporous silica nanoparticles. Scientific Report: 1-10.

66.                Zhu c, Wang x, Lin z, Xie z, Wang x (2014) Cell microenvironment stimuli-responsive controlled-release delivery systems based on mesoporous silica nanoparticles. Journal of Food and Drug Analysis 22: 18-28.

67.                Han N, Zhao Q, Wan L, Wang Y, Gao Y, et al. (2015) Hybrid lipid capped mesoporous silica for stimuliresponsive drug release and overcoming multidrug resistance. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 7: 3342-51.

68.                Wu x, Wang z, Zhu D, Zong S, Yang L, Zhong Y. et al. A pH- and Thermo-dual stimuli responsive drug carrier based on mesoporous silica nanoparticles encapsulated in copolymer-lipid bilayers. Applied Materials & Interfaces 5: 10895-10903.

69.                Weib VO (2014) Mesoporous silica nanoparticles as drug delivery platforms Drug loading, pore sealing, targeting and controlled drug/endosomal release. Landshut, Germany. Pg No: 1-213.

70.                Sun Y, Sai H, Spoth KA, Tan KW, Zwanziger U, et al. (2015) Stimuli-responsive shape shifting mesoporous silica nanoparticles. American Chemical Society : A-F.

71.                Song Y, Li Y, Xu Q, Liu Z (2017) Mesoporous silica nanoparticles for stimuli-responsive controlled drug delivery: advances, challenges, and outlook. International Journal of Nanomedicine 12: 87-110.

72.                Das A, Gupta N, Gowda DV, Bhosale RR (2017) A Review on pH-sensitive polymeric nanoparticles for cancer therapy. International Journal of Chem Tech Research 10: 575-588.

73.                 Liu J, Huang Y, Kumar A, Tan A, Jin S, et al. (2014) pH-sensitive Nano-systems for drug delivery in cancer therapy. Biotechnology Advances 32: 693-710.

74.                Wen H and Li Y (2014) Redox sensitive nanoparticles with disulfide bond linked sheddable shell for intracellular drug delivery. Medicinal chemistry 4: 748-755.

75.                Meng F, Hennink WE, Zhong Z (2009) Reduction-sensitive polymers and bioconjugates for biomedical applications. Biomaterials 30: 2180-2198.

76.                Fu Q, Ramarao GV, Ista LK, Wu y, Andrzejewski BP, et al. (2003) Control of molecular transport through stimuli-responsive ordered mesoporous materials. Advanced materials 15: 1262-1266.

77.                Hu Q, Katti PS, Gu Z (2014) Enzyme-responsive nanomaterials for controlled drug delivery. Nanoscale 6: 12273-12286.

78.    Paris JL, Cabanas MV, Manzano M, Regi M (2015) Polymer-grafted mesoporous silica nanoparticles as ultrasound-responsive drug carriers. American Chemical Society Nano 9: 11023-11033.

79.                Rapoport N, Nam K, Gupta R, Gao Z, Mohan P, et al. (2011) Ultrasound-mediated tumor imaging and nanotherapy using drug loaded, block copolymer stabilized perfluorocarbon Nano emulsions. Journal of Controlled Release 153: 4-15.

80.                Wood AK and Sehgal CM (2015) A review of low-intensity ultrasound for cancer therapy. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology 41: 905-928.

81.                Zhan J, Ma Z, Wang D. Li X, Li X, et al. (2017) Magnetic and PH dual-responsive mesoporous silica nanocomposites for effective and low-toxic photodynamic therapy. International Journal of Nanomedicine 12: 2733-2748.

82.                Tarn D, Ashley CE, Xue M, Carnes EC, Zink JI, et al. (2012) Mesoporous silica nanoparticle nanocarriers: biofunctionality and biocompatibility. Accounts of Chemical Research 2012: A-J.

83.                Liu ZT, Xiong L, Liu Z1, Miao X, Lin LW, et al. (2014) In vivo and in vitro evaluation of the cytotoxic effects of Photosan-loaded hollow silica nanoparticles on liver cancer. Nanoscale Research Letters 9: 319.

84.                Wang Y, Li B, Zhang L, Song H, Zhang L (2013) Targeted delivery system based on magnetic mesoporous silica nanocomposites with light-controlled release character. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 5: 11-15.

85.                Hayashi k, Nakamura M, Miki H, Ozaki S, Abe M, et al. (2014) Magnetically responsive smart nanoparticles for cancer treatment with a combination of magnetic hyperthermia and remote-control drug release. Theranostics 4: 834-844.

86.                Cole AJ, Yang VC, David AE (2011) Cancer theranostics: the rise of targeted magnetic nanoparticles. Trends in Biotechnology 2: 323-332.

87.                Reddy LH, Arias JL, Nicolas J, Couvreur P (2012) magnetic nanoparticles: design and characterization, toxicity and biocompatibility, pharmaceutical and biomedical applications. Chemical Reviews 112: 5818-5878.

88.                Colombo M, Romero S, Casula MF, Gutierrez L, Morales MP, et al. (2012) Biological applications of magnetic nanoparticles. Chemical Society Reviews 41: 4306-4334.

89.                Jadhav SA, Miletto I, Brunella V, Scalarone D, Berlier G (2017) Porous silica particles: synthesis, physicochemical characterization and evaluation of suspension stability. Physical Chemistry Indian Journal 2017; S1: 1-11.

90.                Kaasalainen M, Aseyev V, Haartman EV, Karaman DS, Makila E, et al. (2017) Size, stability and porosity of mesoporous nanoparticles characterized with light scattering Nanoscale Research Letters 2017:1-10.

91.                Bagwe R, Hilliard LR, Tan W (2006) Surface modification of silica nanoparticles to reduce aggregation and nonspecific binding. Langmuir 22: 4357-4362.

92.                 Nam Y, Lee D, Cho E (2013) Role of phosphate-modified mesoporous silica nanoparticles for altering metal-induced aggregation process of pluronic f127 block copolymer. Materials Letters 110: 176-179.

93.                Hu Y, Zhi Z, Wang T, Jiang T, Wang S (2011) Incorporation of indomethacin nanoparticles into 3-D ordered macroporous silica for enhanced dissolution and reduced gastric irritancy. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics 79: 544-551.

94.                Wang Y, Zhao Q, Han N, Bai L, Li J, et al. (2015) Mesoporous silica nanoparticles in drug delivery and biomedical applications. Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology, and Medicine 11: 313-327.

95.                Meng H, Xue M, Xia T, Ji Z, Tarn DY, et al. (2011) Use of size and a copolymer design feature to improve the biodistribution and the enhanced permeability and retention effect of doxorubicin- loaded mesoporous silica nanoparticles in a murine xenograft tumor model. American Chemical Society Nano 5: 4131-4144.

96.                Rosenholm JM, Meinander A, Peuhu E, Niemi R, Eriksson JE, et al. (2009) Targeting of porous hybrid silica nanoparticles to cancer cells. American Chemical Society Nano 3: 197-206.

97.                Kralj S, Rojnik M, Kos J, Makovec D. Targeting EGFR-overexpressed A431 cells with EGF-labeled silica-coated magnetic nanoparticles. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 15: 1-11.

98.                Pan L, He Q, Liu J, Chen Y, Ma M, et al. (2012) Nuclear-targeted drug delivery of tat peptide-conjugated monodisperse mesoporous silica nanoparticles. Journal of American Chemical Society 134: 5722-5725.

99.                Deng z, Zhen z, Hu x, Wu s, Xu z, et al. (2011) Hollow chitosane silica nanospheres as pH-sensitive targeted delivery carriers in breast cancer therapy. Biomaterials 32: 4976-4986.

100.             Zhu Y, Ikoma T, Hanagata N, Kaskel S (2010) Rattle-type Fe3O4@SiO2 hollow mesoporous spheres as carriers for drug delivery. Small 6: 471-478.

101.       Ashley CE, Carnes EC, Phillips GK, Padilla D, Durfee PN et al. (2011) The targeted delivery of multicomponent cargos to cancer cells by nonporous particle-supported lipid bilayers. Nature Materials 2011; 10: 389-397.

102.             Cho M, Cho W, Choi M, Kim SJ, Han BS et al. (2009) The impact of size on tissue distribution and elimination by single intravenous injection of silica nanoparticles. Toxicology Letters 189: 177-183.

103.                Chen Y, Chen H, Shi J (2013) In vivo bio-safety evaluations and diagnostic /therapeutic applications of chemically designed mesoporous silica nanoparticles. Advanced Materials 2013: 1-33.

104.                Ga W, Chan JM, Farokhzad OC (2010) pH-responsive nanoparticles for drug delivery. Molecular Pharmaceutics 7: 1913-1920.