research article

Outcomes of Advanced Age in Renal Transplantation

Jacentha Buggs1*, Marbelly Davila2, Victor Bowers1

1Transplant Surgery, Tampa General Medical Group, Tampa General Hospital, Tampa, Florida, USA

2Information Technology, Tampa General Hospital, Tampa, Florida, USA

*Corresponding author: Jacentha Buggs, Transplant Surgery, Tampa General Medical Group, Tampa General Hospital, Tampa, Florida, USA. Tel: +18138445080; Email: Jbuggs@tgmg.org

Received Date: 14 November, 2017; Accepted Date:  28 November, 2017; Published Date: 05 December, 2017

Citation: Buggs J, Davila M, Bowers V (2017) Outcomes of Advanced Age in Renal Transplantation. Aging Res Open Acc: J Aging Neuro Psychol: JANP-106. DOI: 10.29011/JANP-106.100006

1.   Abstract

1.1.  Introduction: Kidney transplantation (KT) is the preferred treatment modality for end-stage renal disease (ESRD). There are some professionals who believe advanced aged (AA) recipients (age ≥60 years) do less well with renal transplants and are therefore a poor use of a scarce resource.

1.2.  Objective: Our objective was to identify outcomes in KT patients age ≥60vs. age<60.

1.3.  Methods: We conducted a ten-year retrospective cohort study of 1,685 consecutive adult (≥18 yrs.) cadaveric kidney transplants from January 1999 through December 2008. The impact of recipient and donor variables on the primary outcome was tested in exploratory univariate logistic regression analysis. Factors significantly associated with graft failure were entered into a multivariate logistic regression model.

1.4. Results: There were 500 (29.6%) patients age 60 and older. The mean age was 50.8±13.7 years. Overall, 324 (19%) grafts failed after kidney transplant with a mean follow-up of 7.8±3.6years. The mean time to graft failure was 4.86 ± 3.42 years. During the same follow-up period, mortality occurred in 393 (23.3%) patients. Five recipient factors were associated with 5- year graft failure in the multivariate model: age, prior transplant, HLA mismatch, increased serum creatinine at initial discharge and delayed graft function. Likewise, expanded criteria donors were associated with increased 5- year graft failure. Interestingly, a unit increase (1-year) in recipient age was associated with a 3% decrease in odds of 5-year graft failure (OR=0.97; 95% CI [0.96-0.98]; p<0.0001).

1.5. Conclusion: Based on outcomes, patients with advanced age should be considered for kidney transplantation. Further research is indicated to fully understand the contributors to superior graft survival and death in older transplant patients.

1.  Introduction

ESRD is best treated with kidney transplantation. As we live longer and the rates of ESRD continue to increase, more patients with advanced age present for kidney transplantation [1,2]. Patients over the age of 50 comprise the majority of patients with ESRD (60%) [1]. Also, the numbers of older patients on the kidney transplant waitlist has nearly doubled in the prior decade, (1) and the rate of transplants over the age of 60 has increased [1,2]. The objective of our study was to evaluate the differences in organ and patient survival between renal transplant recipients age 60 years or greater vs. those younger than age 60.

2. Methods

After obtaining Institutional Review Board approval, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of consecutive adult patients (age ≥18) at our center who underwent kidney transplantation from January 1, 1999 – December 31, 2008. Patients were excluded if they received simultaneous organ transplantation or records were incomplete. Electronic medical records and the transplant database were reviewed on each patient during the dates of the study with a follow- up of 5 years. We examined the impact of various recipient and donor variables on patient and graft survival to fit a multivariate model. Continuous variables were reported as a mean ± standard deviation and compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical variables were compared using the Chi-squared test. Kaplan Meier analysis with the log-rank test was used for time to event analysis. The statistical significance for all comparisons was set at 5%. Data analyses were performed using SAS 9.4.

3. Results

Between January 1, 1999 and December 31, 2008, our center performed 1,857 adult (age ≥ 18) kidney transplants. We excluded 172 patients who underwent simultaneous kidney transplants with an additional solid organ transplant and or their records were missing data. There was a total of N=1,685 transplant recipients from 1,383 donors. The mean age at transplant was 50.8 ± 13.7 years with 500 recipients (29.7%) age ≥60 and 1,185 recipients (70.3%) age <60. The mean body mass index was 26.8 ± 5.3 kg/m2. The Caucasian race represented 71.4% of all recipients. A total of 202 (12%) patients underwent a prior solid organ transplant with 37 (18%) age ≥60 and 165 (82%) age <60 (Table 1) 

Extended criteria donors (ECD) were allocated in 210 (12%) kidney transplants, with 115 (55%) age ≥ 60 and 95

(45%) age <60 (p< 0.0001) (Figure 1).

Extended criteria donors (ECD) were allocated in 210 (12%) kidney transplants, with 115 (55%) age ≥ 60 and 95

(45%) age <60 (p < 0.0001)

The length of stay was statistically significantly longer with8 days for recipients age ≥ 60 and 7 days for recipients age < 60 (p = .02). There was no statistically significant difference in mortality during the transplant admission with 4 deaths (0.8%) in recipients age ≥60 and 5 deaths (0.4%) in recipients age <60 (p = 0.46). There were no statistical differences in infections or complications (MI, UTI, sepsis, pneumonia, DVT, cardiac stent, and stroke) within one year of kidney transplantation between the two groups (Table 2).

After five years, we experienced 179 (10.6%) graft failures censored for patient death with 37 in age ≥ 60 vs. 142 in age <60, with a mean time to failure of 4.86 ± 3.42 years (p=.01) (Figure 2).

Graft failure non-censored for patient death resulted in 320 events with 112 in age ≥ 60 vs. 208 in age <60 (p=0.03)

 The five-year patient survival decreased to 81.8% (91 deaths) for patients age ≥ 60 and 91.5% survival (101 deaths) for patients age<60 (p< 0.0001) (Figure 5).

The one-year patient survival for patients age≥60 was 96.2% (19 deaths) vs. 97.9% survival for patients age<60 (25 deaths); p = .05 (Figure 4).

There were 5 recipient factors (age, prior transplant, HLA mismatch, increased serum creatinine at discharge and delayed graft function, and 1 donor factor (ECD) which correlated with 5-year graft failure (Table 3). Recipients age ≥60y were 3% less likely to have graft failure unrelated to death when compared with the patients <60y (OR=0.97 [0.96-0.98]; p<0.0001).

4.  Discussion

As the American population continues to age, and the epidemic of obesity continues, we can expect to transplant more and more patients over the age of 60 due to ESRD. Our study demonstrates there are recipient and donor factors associated with an increase in graft failure in kidney transplantation including but not limited to a prior transplant, HLA mismatch, extended criteria donors, serum creatinine increase and delayed graft function. However, advanced age of the recipient correlated with a 3% decrease in odds of 5-year graft failure. Studies have demonstrated a higher mortality rate for older kidney transplant patients [3-5] with no difference in death-censored graft survival suggesting that many older kidney transplant recipients may not live long enough to experience a graft failure. Our findings were consistent with a higher 5-year graft survival for patients age ≥60 (92.6%) vs. patients age <60 (88%), (p=.005); yet a lower 5-year patient survival at 81.8% for patients age ≥60 vs. 91.5% for patients age<60 (p<.00001) (Figure 5). Perhaps our outcomes are biased by a more comprehensive work-up or selection of our older patients as there were no statistical differences noted in our complications, and our older patients have a 1-day longer mean length of stay for the transplant admission (8 vs. 7 days; p =.02) (Table 2).

Despite these nuances, kidney transplantation even with advanced age provides a greater survival benefit over hemodialysis (16.1 death rate/100 patient-yrs.), and those on the transplant waitlist (6.3 death rate/100 patient yrs.) [6- 12]. Wolfe et al. [6] demonstrated the risk of transplant-related death was 2.8 times that of patients on the waiting list until 106 days post-transplant after which the risk of death becomes much lower for transplant recipients with similar survival in in the two groups at 244 days. Our study indicated recipients age ≥60y were 3% less likely to have graft failure compared with the patients <60y (OR=0.97 [0.96-0.98]; p<0.0001). The leading cause of death with advanced age kidney transplantation remains as cardiovascular disease and infection [13,14] our findings demonstrated lower survival rates in our advanced age renal transplant patients; however, there was no significant difference in cardiovascular or infectious complications during the transplant admission suggesting these events occurred later after discharge from the hospital.

5.  Conclusion

The five-year graft survival for kidney transplantation in patients with advanced age (≥60) is better than with patients

<60. Recipients age ≥60 were 3% less like to experience graft failure unrelated to death when compared with patients

<60. In addition, the mortality outcomes of older patients with a transplant are better than similarly aged patients on dialysis or the transplant waitlist. These findings support continued efforts to transplant kidneys in patients with advanced age as expeditiously as possible. Our results are limited to a single center retrospective cohort study.

6.    Conflict of Interest: The authors do not have any disclosures to report.

7.   Acknowledgements: Special thanks to Ebonie Rogers B.S., Tampa General Medical Group Research Coordinator for edits, and tables.


Figure 1: Expanded Criteria Donors by Recipients.



Figure 2: Kaplan-Meier Plot of Cumulative 5 Year Graft Failure Censored for Patient Death.



Figure 3: Kaplan-Meier Plot of Cumulative 5 Year Graft Failure Non-Censored for Patient Death.



Figure 4: One-year patient survival.



Figure 5: Five-year patient survival.

 

Baseline Characteristics

Recipient(N = 1,685)

Donor(N= 1,383)

Age (yr.)

50.8 ±13.7

 

36.9 ±15.9

<60

70.30%

60

29.70%

Gender, Male

60.70%

53.70%

Body Mass Index (kg/m2)

26.8 ±5.3

25.8 ±5.6

Race, White or Caucasian

71.40%

 

n/a

Previous organ transplantation, yes

12%

 

n/a

<60

81.80%

60

18.20%

Data are mean ±standard deviation or n (%).

 

Table 1: Baseline Characteristics of Recipients and Donors.

 

Outcomes and Complications

Age <60

Age ≥60

p-value

(n=1,185)

(n=500)

Delayed graft function

175 (14.8%)

83 (16.6%)

0.34

Length of hospital stay, median

7

8

0.02

In-hospital mortality

5 (0.4%)

4 (0.8%)

0.46

Myocardial Infarction

7 (0.6%)

5 (1.0%)

0.55

Urinary Tract Infection

142 (12.0%)

82 (16.4%)

0.22

Sepsis

36 (3.0%)

18 (3.6%)

1.00

Pneumonia

11 (0.9%)

11 (2.2%)

0.11

Deep Venous Thrombosis

34 (2.9%)

22 (4.4%)

0.31

Cardiac Stent

5 (0.4%)

1 (0.2%)

0.67

Stroke

3 (0.3%)

2 (0.4%)

0.67

 

Table 2: Patients Outcomes and Complications after Renal Transplantation.

 

Covariate

Odds ratio (95% CI)

p-value

Patient Age

0.97 (0.96-0.99)

<.0001

Prior transplant (No vs. Yes)

0.68 (0.42-1.00)

0.05

HLA mismatch

1.20 (1.08-1.33)

0.0009

Serum creatinine at discharge

1.50 (1.32-1.69)

<.0001

Delayed graft function (No vs Yes)

0.65 (0.43-0.99)

0.04

Expanded Criteria Donor (No vs Yes)

0.52 (0.33-0.82)

0.01


Table 3: Significantly Correlated Recipient and Donor Variables.

  1. https://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/data/view-data-reports/annual-report.
  2. Schaeffner ES, Rose C, Gill JS (2010) Access to kidney transplantation among the elderly in the United States: a glass half full, not half empty. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 5:  2109-2114.
  3. Tullius SG, Tran H, Guleria I, Malek SK, Tiney NL, et al. (2010) The combination of donor and recipient age is critical in determining host immunoresponsiveness and renal transplant outcome. Ann Surg 252: 662-674.
  4. McAdams-DeMarco MA, James N, Salter ML,Walston J, Segev DL (2014) Trends in kidney transplant outcomes in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 62: 2235-2242.
  5. Huang E, Poommipanit N, Sampaio MS, Kuo HT, Reddy P, et al. (2010) Intermediate-term outcomes associated with kidney transplantation in recipients 80 years and older: an analysis of the OPTN/UNOS database. Transplantation 90: 974-979.
  6. Wolfe RA, Ashby VB, Milford EL, Ojo AO, Ettenger RE, et al. (1999) Comparison of mortality in all patients on dialysis, patients on dialysis awaiting transplantation, and recipients of a first cadaveric transplant. N Engl J Med 341: 1725-1730.
  7. Hunsicker LG (1999) A survival advantage for renal transplantation. N Engl J Med 341: 1762-1763.
  8. Johnson DW, Herzig K, Purdie D, Brown AM, Rigby RJ, et al. (2000) A comparison of the effects of dialysis and renal transplantation on the survival of older uremic patients. Transplantation 69: 794-799.
  9. Oniscu GC, Brown H, Forsythe JL (2004) How great is the survival advantage of transplantation over dialysis in elderly patients? Nephrol Dial Transplant 19: 945-951.
  10. Giessing M, Budde K, Fritsche L, Slowinski T, Tuerk I, et al. (2003)"Old-for-old" cadaveric renal transplantation: surgical findings, perioperative complications and outcome. EurUrol 44: 701-708.
  11. Rao PS, Merion RM, Ashby VB, Port FK, Wolfe RA, et al. (2007) Renal transplantation in elderly patients older than 70 years of age: results from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. Transplantation 83: 1069-1074.
  12. Emilie S, Dorothee T, Ylana C, Jean-michel R, Philippe T (2007) Survival benefits of kidney transplantation with expanded criteria deceased donors’ inpatients aged 60years and over. Transplantation 84: 1618-1624.
  13. Martins PN, Pratschke J, Pascher A, Fritsche L, Frei U, et al. (2005) Age and immune response in organ transplantation. Transplantation 79: 127-132.
  14. Trouillhet I, Benito N, Cervera C, Rivas P, Cofán F, et al. (2005) Influence of age in renal transplant infections: cases and controls study. Transplantation 80: 989-992.

© by the Authors & Gavin Publishers. This is an Open Access Journal Article Published Under Attribution-Share Alike CC BY-SA: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International License. With this license, readers can share, distribute, download, even commercially, as long as the original source is properly cited. Read More.

Journal of Aging and Neuropsychology

rumus slot mahjongrtp slot gacorfitur slot mahjong winsrekomendasi slot pragmartp live slotpola gates of gatotkacaapk cheat slotzeus godwrath maxwinmitra slot dana resmihabanero anti gagalserver kamboja gacordaftar link togelslot pg mahjongtrik pola zeus x500slot gacor mudah menangslot mahjong pragmaticpola trik slot mahjongrtp fortune dragonrtp slot speed winnerslot kamboja mahjong waystrik mantap slot olympusnaga hitam mahjongslot tergacor mahjongtrik jitu cuan mahjongpola slot mahjong winsrtp tinggi pragmaticslot mahjong onlineslot gacor hari inislot bonanza gacorfreebet mahjong winsserver jp rtp tinggigame resmi pragmatic terbaiktaktik efektif mahjongpola mahjong rekomendasi googleaztec gems boskututorial mahjong ways2starlight princess hari inipola starlight princessrtp fortune tigerrtp pg softrtp starlight princesstrik mahjong waysperkalian x5000 banditoslot mahjong waysslot terbaik olympusslot gates of olympusdaftar slot dana maxwinbocoran pola olympusmaxwin slot bonanzabocoran rtp tinggislot samurai codemetode slot starlightslot zeusrtp slot gacor pragmaticrtp slot pg softcara menang slot onlinescatter slot mahjongslot gacor server luar rekomendasi link olympusgerbang gatot kacartp kakek olympusslot gacor andalanrtp slot pgslot mahjongslot mahjong server jepangperkalian besar starlightrtp ways of qilinslot terbaik mahjongmahjong bulan mudastrategi permainan pragmaticcheat engine gacorjackpot auto cuanmahjong mekanik tinggitrik slot mahjongtips main slotslot server thailandpola mahjong unguslot gacor menangpg soft scatterslot olympusbocoran togel terpercayaamantotorm1131aman toto