Phenol Removal from Aqueous Solutions Using Low-Cost Neem Seeds Activated Carbon as an Adsorbent
Lallan Singh Yadav, Bijay Kumar Mishra, Arvind Kumar*
Department of Chemical Engineering, Sambalpur University, India
*Corresponding author: Arvind Kumar, Department of Chemical Engineering, Sambalpur University, India. Tel: +916612462268; Fax: +916612472999; Email: arvindkumar@nitrkl.ac.in
Received Date: 02 April, 2018; Accepted Date: 04 June, 2018; Published Date: 12 June,
2018
Citation: Yadav LS, Mishra BK, Kumar
A (2018) Phenol Removal from
Aqueous Solutions Using Low Cost Neem Seeds Activated Carbon as an Adsorbent. Int J Pollut Res:
IJPR-101. DOI: 10.29011/IJPR -101.000001
1. Abstract
The potential of laboratory prepared Neem Seeds Activated Carbon (NSAC) as a natural adsorbent for toxic organic compound, such as Phenol, From Wastewater Was Investigated. Batch experiments were conducted to study the effects of pH, temperature, initial concentration, and dose of absorbents for their optimum values. Results indicated that the adsorption of Phenol Depended Significantly on All the Above-Mentioned Parameters. The experimental data were fitted to pseudo-first-order and pseudo second-order kinetics models. The diffusivity and mass transfer coefficients for phenol was also evaluated in the present work. Langmuir, Freundlich, Temkin and Redlich-Peterson isotherms were tested for their fitness to the experimental data. The maximum mass of phenol adsorbed was evaluated using Langmuir isotherm at optimum conditions and compared with that obtained for previously reported materials. Thermodynamic parameters including the Gibbs free energy, enthalpy, and entropy were also calculated. This study showed that NSAC may be explored as a new material for removing phenol from the waste water.
2.
Keywords: Adsorption; Isotherm; Kinetics; Neem Seed
Activated Carbon; Phenol Removal
1. Introduction
Phenol Commonly Is Widely Used in Several Industries, e.g., petrochemicals, plastics, pesticides, pharmaceuticals dyes and many others [1,2]. Phenol is a hazardous compound (U.S. EPA), theraefore the various agencies of the world has set a maximum discharge limit of Phenol in to Wastewaters Stream. If it is released in effluent it can cause serious damage to the environment due to its high toxicity for aquatic organisms [3]. Thus, the elimination of Phenol Is Very Necessary for Environmental Protection. Several Techniques Have Been Developed to Remove Phenol from Wastewater like Chemical Oxidation, electrocoagulation, solvent extraction, membrane separation and adsorption [4]. Among all of these methods adsorptions has been preferred due to its low-cost and the high-quality of the treated effluents. Research interests into the production of alternative adsorbents to replace costly activated carbon and synthetic resins have intensified in recent years. Attention has been focused on various adsorbents, which have absorption capacities and are able to Remove Unwanted Phenols from Contaminated Water at Low-Cost. Recently, some nature and cheap adsorbents have been developed in the laboratory [5]. Adsorption onto agricultural waste material used recently as an economical and realistic method for removal of different pollutants has proved to be efficient at removing of phenol [6]. Since, not many studies have been reported in literature on the adsorption of phenol using Neem Seed Activated Carbon. In This Study, Neem Seeds Activated Carbon (NSAC) was investigated as a low-cost adsorbent for removing of phenol from aqueous solutions. Several experimental factors which affect the removal of phenol such as adsorbate-adsorbent contact time, initial solution pH, adsorbent dosage, adsorbate concentration and adsorption temperature were optimized. The equilibrium and kinetic data of the adsorption process were then analyzed to study the adsorption characteristics and mechanism of phenol onto the prepared activated carbon.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1 Activated Carbon Preparation from Neem Seeds
Among various materials available for the production of activated carbons, cost, high carbon content and easily availability are important criteria for their selection [7]. In the present work, a new adsorbent has been explored which good adsorption capacity as compare to other low cost activated carbon has derived from agro-waste. Neem Seeds (NS) were obtained from the campus of National Institute of Technology (NIT), Rourkela. Without any treatment excepting washing in tap water to remove dirt etc., NS was charred in muffle furnace at temperature of 700 K for 60 min and it was further treated with alkali (NaOH). The alkali (NaOH)-treated charred was filtered, washed with Distilled Water (DW) and then oven-dried at 95oC for 12 h, and stored for end use. Activated Carbon Thus Prepared Was Named as Neem Seed Activated Carbon (Nsac).
2.2 Characterization of The Prepared Activated Carbon
The specific surface area measurement of NSAC was carried out at Kunash Instruments Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai, by N2 adsorption using a Micromeritics instrument (Tristar 3000) and by using the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) method, using the software of Micromeritics. Nitrogen was used as a cold bath (77.15 K). The physico-chemical characterizations (Table 1) of NSAC were done using standard methods [8-10]. The Point of zero charge of was determined as per the method presented by [11]. Surface groups (acidic and basic) present on the NSAC (Table 1) were determined using Boehm titration method [12].
2.3 Preparation of Adsorbate Stock Solutions
The stock solutions of phenol concentration 1000 mg/L were prepared by dissolving appropriate amount of phenol in distilled water. Desired concentrations were prepared from the respective stock solutions, making fresh dilutions for each adsorption study. The Co was ascertained before the start of each experimental run. The pH of each solution was adjusted to the required value with 0.1 M HCI and NaOH solutions before mixing the NSAC.
2.4 Analytical Measurements
The concentration of phenol in the aqueous solution was determined by using a UV-spectrophotometer. Absorbance values were recorded at the corresponding maximum absorbance wavelength λ max. The calibration curve of the peak area versus phenol concentration was used for the determination of the unknown concentration of phenol from a sample. Wherever required, the sample was appropriately diluted to have the phenol concentration in the calibration range.
2.5 Adsorption Studies
For each experiment,
50 ml of phenol of known concentration
and a known amount of the adsorbent were placed in a 100 ml airtight stoppered
conical flask. This mixture was agitated in a temperature -controlled shaking
water bath, at a constant speed (150 rpm) for all experimental runs. The
percentage removal of phenol was calculated using the following relationship:
Percentage
removal (%R) = 100 (1)
Where, Co is the initial sorbate concentration (mg/l) and Ct is the equilibrium sorbate concentration (mg/l). The adsorption capacity of NSAC was calculated using the following equation:
Where, qe (mg/g) is the amount of phenol sorbed by adsorbent, Co and Ce (mg/l) are the initial and equilibrium liquid phase concentration of phenol solutions, respectively, V (l) is the initial volume of dye solution, m (g) is the weight of the NSAC. For the optimum conditions determination of the various parameters such as contact time, pH, initial dye concentration, adsorbent dose, temperatures were studied for the phenol. Using optimum conditions phenol removal capacity, equilibrium values and kinetic studies were performed for phenol.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Effect of Various Parameters
3.1.1. Effect of NSAC Concentrations
To find out the optimum dosage of NSAC, the NSAC concentrations were varied from 0.2 to 6 g/l at fixed initial phenol concentration of 100 mg/l (Figure 1). It was observed that on increasing the adsorbent dosage the uptake capacity of phenol decreases, while the %R increases because m is inversely proportional to the uptake capacity. The point where these two curves cut together is regarded as an optimum adsorbent dose which was found to be 1.2 g/l. Beyond this dosage, there is limited availability of adsorption sites and do not contribute much for further removal of phenol. Various authors have been reported similar finding for phenol adsorption onto activated carbon prepared from various adsorbents [13-15].
3.1.2 Effect of pH
The pH of the phenol
solution plays an important role in the whole adsorption process and especially
on the adsorption capacity. The experiments were performed at various pH [2-12].
It was clear from (Figure 2) that as the pH varies the adsorption of phenol
increases and reached to maximum (22 mg/g) at pH=8. Further, increase in pH
reduces the uptake of phenol onto NSAC. This phenomenon can be explained based
point of zero charge of the adsorbent. The pH, at which the surface charge of
adsorbent is zero, is called the point of zero charge (PZC). The surface is
positively charged at pH
3.1.3 Effect of contact time and initial phenol concentrations
To find out the optimum contact time for maximum adsorption of phenol onto NSAC, experiments were done for varying time periods between 15 and 360 min at pH 8 by adding 1.2 g/l of adsorbent to Co=50-100 mg/l phenol solution. In (Figure 3) the relationship between the phenol uptake (qe, mg/g) and the initial concentration of phenol (Co=50-150 mg/l) in the aqueous solutions after 6 hours of adsorption for NSAC is shown. From the it is clear that the amount of phenol uptake, qe (mg/g), is increased with contact time at all initial phenol concentrations. Further, the amount of phenol adsorbed is increased with increase in initial phenol concentration. For the first 70 min, the phenol sorbed was found from ~9 to ~47 mg/g for an increase in Co from 50 to 150 mg/l. (Figure 3) also depicts that phenol uptake is rapid for the first 70 min and thereafter it proceeds at a slower rate and finally attains saturation. These observations show that the Co has no effect on equilibrium time. The higher sorption rate at the initial period (first 70 min) may be due to an increased number of vacant sites available at the initial stage, as a result there exist increased concentration gradients between adsorbate in solution and adsorbate in the adsorbent surface [21]. This increase in concentration gradient tends to increase in phenol sorption rate at the initial stages. As time precedes this concentration is reduced due to the accumulation of phenol in the vacant sites, leading to a decrease in sorption rate at later stages from 70 to 120 min. It can be seen, that the higher the initial concentration, the higher the adsorption ability, as is documented by values of qt. For phenol Co =50- 150 mg/l, time of 120 min was sufficient to achieve the equilibrium state. Hence, 120 min was taken as optimum contact time for phenol-NSAC system.
3.1.4 Adsorption kinetic study
The pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order models kinetic models (table 2) have been used in the present study to investigate the adsorption process of phenol onto NSAC. The details of all these kinetic models are presented elsewhere [22-24]. Pseudo-first and second-order equation have been solved by using non-linear technique and kS and qe were obtained. (Figure 4) shows a representative plot of qt versus t (experimental and calculated) for adsorption of phenol onto NSAC for Co= 50-150 mg/l at m= 1.2 g/l, pH=8 and T=303 K. The best-fit values of h, qe and kS along with the correlation coefficients for the pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order models for the adsorbate-adsorbent system are given in (Table 2). In the present work, the applicability of the pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order models has been tested for the sorption of phenol onto NSAC. The best-fit model was selected based on the regression correlation coefficient, R2 values. The corresponding non-linear regression correlation coefficient R2 values are given in (Table 2). From (Table 2), it was observed that the R2 values for the pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order models were found to be comparable at all initial phenol concentrations. The higher values of R2 confirm that the sorption process follows a physio-chemical mechanism sorption behavior. This was later on also confirming by the thermodynamics of phenol adsorption onto NSAC.
Pseudo-first-order [40]:
Concentration (mg/l) |
50 mg/l |
75 mg/l |
100 mg/l |
150 mg/l |
qe,exp (mg/g) |
13.75 |
21.21 |
30.91 |
53 |
qe,calc (mg/g) |
13.94 |
21.23 |
30.92 |
53 |
kf (min-1) |
0.018 |
0.023 |
0.026 |
0 |
R2 |
0.985 |
0.99 |
0.987 |
0.9 |
MPSD |
13.36 |
9.78 |
10.81 |
12 |
Pseudo-second-order [45]:
Concentration (mg/l) |
50 mg/l |
75 mg/l |
100 mg/l |
150 mg/l |
qe,exp (mg/g) |
13.75 |
21.21 |
30.91 |
53 |
qe,calc (mg/g) |
13.94 |
21.23 |
30.92 |
53 |
kf (min-1) |
0.018 |
0.023 |
0.026 |
0 |
R2 |
0.985 |
0.99 |
0.987 |
0.9 |
MPSD |
13.36 |
9.78 |
10.81 |
12 |
Intra particle diffusion [41]:
kint1(mg/ g. min1/2) |
1.9862 |
2.1462 |
3.0338 |
3.8558 |
C1(mg/g) |
1.1759 |
1.1598 |
0.3013 |
17.023 |
R2 |
0.9873 |
0.9982 |
1 |
0.9821 |
kint2 (mg/ g. min1/2) |
- |
0.0092 |
- |
0.0064 |
C2 (mg/g) |
- |
21.044 |
30.9 |
53.54 |
R2 |
- |
0.8318 |
- |
0.3844 |
Elovich [42,43]:
b (g/mg) |
0.2806 |
0.5736 |
0.1594 |
7.5263 |
a (mg/g. min) |
6.53*10-9 |
12.8 |
10.625 |
45.94 |
R2 |
0.9171 |
0.9223 |
0.9159 |
0.9203 |
Bangham [44]:
3.1.5 Adsorption diffusion study
In order to estimate weather, the sorption process is rate limiting step mean either pore diffusion or surface diffusion or external mass transfer means boundary layer diffusion. The kinetic data as obtained by conducting batch experiments have been tested by the model given by (25):
Where qt
and qe are the amount of phenol adsorb at any time t and equilibrium
(mg/g). F (t) is fractional amount of phenol adsorb and Bt is a function of F (t).
Substituting eq. 3 in eq. 4, eq simplifies to:
The fitting of data plot (linear lines) Bt versus t (min) for all phenol initial concentrations did not pass through the origin (Figure 5) indicating that the adsorption of phenol onto the NSAC was mainly due to external mass transport where particle diffusion (exterior surface of the adsorbent) was the rate limiting step [26].
The Bt values were
also used to calculate the effective diffusivity, De (cm2/s) using
the relation given by [27]:
Where, r represents the particle radius estimated by sieve analysis by assuming as spherical particles. The values of effective diffusion coefficient (De) for concentrations 50-150 mg/l calculated by Eq. (5). Average value of De are found to be 4.18 x 10-13 m2/s for phenol adsorption onto NSAC.
A mass transfer phenomenon was studied with the help of following equation,
Where and Ct are the initial
phenol concentration (mg/L) and concentration at time of t of the adsorbate respectively;
m (g/L) is the mass of adsorbent. K (L/g) is the Langmuir constant, (cm/s) is the mass transfer coefficient and Ss (L/cm) is the outer surface of the adsorbent per unit
volume. According to above equation, surface mass transfer is controlling when
tends to zero. A plot of ln[Ct/Co)-(1/(1+mK))] versus t results in a straight line (Table 3). The
value of
have been
calculated from slope and intercept of the straight line. At Co=100 mg/l,
values 3.44×10-7,
2.74×10-7 and 2.34×10-7 cm/s were obtained at temperature
303, 313 and 323 K respectively, indicating that the transfer of phenol from
bulk of the liquid to adsorbent surface is very rapid and the adsorbent is
suitable for removal of phenol from aqueous solution. Similar finding related
to determination of mass transfer coefficient has been reported earlier (28).
3.1.6 Adsorption isotherms studies
The adsorption isotherms show the relation between the concentration of adsorbate and its degree of adsorption onto adsorbent surface at constant temperature. Several isotherm models have been used to fit to the experimental data over the temperature range of 303-333K and evaluate the isotherm performance for phenol adsorption. These isotherm models included the Freundlich model [29-31], Langmuir model, Temkin model and Redlich-Peterson (R-P) adsorption isotherm model. The adsorption plots and the fitting model parameters with R2 for the different models were individually shown in (Figure 6)) and (Table 4). Calculated constants of all the isotherms and their corresponding non-linear regression coefficients at various temperatures are presented in (Table 4). In terms of R2 values, the applicability of the above four models for present experimental data approximately followed the order: Langmuir >R-P>Temkin>Freundlich. It was shown that the Langmuir equation had the best fit to the experimental data. The maximum adsorption capacity calculated by this function was ~39 to 41 mg/g over the temperature range as mentioned above. For comparison, the phenol adsorption capacities of reported adsorbents were given in. For comparison, the phenol adsorption capacities of reported adsorbents were given in (Table 4). From the Temkin isotherms, typical bonding energy range for the ion exchange mechanism was reported to be in the range of 8-16 kJ/ mol while the physic-sorption process was reported to have adsorption energies less than −40 kJ/mol [32]. The value of bT (8.46 to 8.70 kJ/mol) obtained in the present work indicated that the adsorption process seemed to be involved in the chemic-sorption and physic-sorption [33]. Further, it was noted that the n value is less than one for Freundlich model indicating a favourable adsorption process for phenol-NSAC system.
3.1.7 Effect of temperature
Adsorption experiments were carried out at various temperatures, i. e. 303, 313 and 323 K, keeping the phenol concentration constant (100 mg/l), NSAC dosage 1.2 g/l and pH 8. It was observed that uptake of phenol by NSAC decreased with increase in temperature.
3.1.8. Estimation of thermodynamic parameters
The free energy of
adsorption can be related with the equilibrium constant K (L/mol) corresponding to the
reciprocal of the Langmuir constant, by the following equation [34]
Where, R is the gas universal
constant (8.314 J. mol/K) and T is
the absolute temperature. Also, enthalpy and entropy
changes can be estimated by the following equations,
respectively [35]
Where, K1 and K2 are the values of the equilibrium constant at temperatures T1 and T2, respectively.
Since, the Langmuir
isotherm could be fitted to the experimental data, free energy of adsorption , enthalpy
, and entropy
changes were estimated by Eq. (9-11) for phenol-NSAC
system. At various concentrations, the estimated values for
were −15.30 to 18.32 kJ/mol at 303 K, -15.57 to -22.45 kJ/mol
at 313 K, -15.12 to -17.90 kJ/mol at 323 K and -16.22 to -19.13 kJ/mol at 333 K
which are rather low indicating that a spontaneous physiosorption process
occurred [36,35]. The enthalpy changes
and entropy of
adsorption. Physical nature of adsorption [38]. As per the values presented
in (Table 5), the present phenol-NSAC system is physco-chemic-sorption in
nature.
were -3.57 to -34.42 and 8.52 to 61.14 kJ/mol K,
respectively. The positive entropy change
value showed that randomness increased with the increase of
species number at the solid/liquid interface during the adsorption of phenol on
NSAC. The negative values of △G° indicated that the
adsorption process was exothermic and spontaneous in nature. The physical
adsorption mechanism exist, if the
values is <−10 kJ/mol [37]. The heat of adsorption values
between 0 and -20 kJ/mol are frequently assumed as to
indicate.
3.1.9. Isosteric Heat of Adsorption
Apparent isosteric
heat of adsorption at constant surface coverage (by considering the range of qe
values obtained in each experiment) is calculated using (Figure7)
Clausius-Clapeyron equation [39].
For this purpose, the
equilibrium concentration (Ce) at a constant equilibrium amount of adsorbed solute, qe, is obtained from the
adsorption isotherm data at different temperatures. Is calculated from the
slope of the InCe versus (1/T) plot for different qe of phenol onto NSAC.
The isosters corresponding to different equilibrium adsorption uptake of phenol
by all the adsorbents is shown through (Figure 8).
The variation of for the adsorption of
phenol with the surface loading is presented in (Figure 9) which shows that the
is increasing with increasing surface loading indicating that
NSAC have homogeneous surface. The dependence of heat of adsorption with
surface coverage is usually observed to display the adsorbent-adsorbate
interaction. The negative values of isosteric heat of adsorption for the
adsorbate-adsorbent system shows that the sorption of phenol is an exothermic
process.
6 Conclusions
The following conclusions can be drawn from the present work
·
The NSAC, an agrobased waste biomaterial can be
efficiently used as an adsorbent for the removal of phenol from its aqueous
solutions.
·
The uptake of phenol adsorbed was found to maximum at
optimum conditions: adsorbent dose= 1.2 g/l, pH= 8, and contact time=120 min at
ambient temperature.
·
The amount of phenol uptake (mg/g) was found to
increase with increase in solution concentration and contact time and found to
decrease with increase in adsorbent dosage.
·
Equilibrium data fitted very well to the Langmuir
isotherm model, confirming the monolayer sorption capacity of phenol onto NSAC
with a monolayer sorption capacity of ~170 mg/g.
·
A Boyd plot confirms the external mass transfer as the
slowest step involved in the sorption process.
·
Based on regression coefficients values of pseudo-first-order
and pseudo-second order kinetics models, and thermodynamics of present
phenol-NSAC system; the phenol sorption onto NSAC is physico-chemic-sorption in
nature.
The negative value of enthalpy of adsorption indicated that the adsorption of phenol onto NSAC
was exothermic in nature
Figure 1: Effect of NSAC dosage for the adsorption of phenol (Co=100 mg/l, initial pH=6, T=303 K, t=5 h).
Figure 2:
Effect of initial pH on the equilibrium uptake of phenol (Co=100
mg/l, m=1.2 g/l for T = 303 K, t =5 h).
Figure
3: Effect of initial
phenol concentration on the removal of phenol onto NSAC (Co= 50-150
mg/l, m=1.2 g/l, pH=8, T = 303 K).
Figure
4: Effect of initial
phenol concentration on the removal of phenol onto NSAC (Co= 50-150
mg/l, m=1.2 g/l, pH=8, T= 303 K).
Figure 5: Boyd plot for the removal of phenol by NSAC (Co=50-150 mg/l; t=5 h; W= 1.2 g/l; pHo=8).
Figure 6: Mass transfer plot for adsorption of phenol-NSAC system (Co=100 mg/l; t=5 h; W= 0.4 g/l; pHo=8).
Figure 7: Equilibrium
isotherm plot for the removal of phenol onto NSAC ( Co
=50-150 mg/l; t =5 h; m = 1.2 g/l; pHo = 8, T = 303
K).
Figure 8: Van‘t Hoff plot for the adsorption of phenol onto NSAC. (Co= 50-150 mg/l; t=5 h; m= 1.2 g/l; pHo=8).
Figure 9: Variation
of ΔHst,a with respect to surface loading of phenol adsorption.
Characteristics | Neem Seed Activated Carbon | |
Proximate analysis | ||
Moisture (%) | 3.59 | |
Volatile matter (%) | 36.54 | |
Ash (%) | 3.09 | |
Fixed Carbon (%) | 56.28 | |
Bulk density (kg/m3) | 0.7702 | |
Dry density | 0.7434 | |
Porosity | 0.1985 | |
Specific gravity | 0.9285 | |
Void ratio | 0.2488 | |
Heating value (cal./g) | 6094 | |
Average particle size (μm) | 531.96 | |
Chemical analysis of Ash | ||
Insoluble (%) | 70 | |
SiO2 (%) | 0.32 | |
Fe2O3 & Al2O3 (%) | 4.89 | |
CaO (%) | 10.37 | |
MgO (%) | 0.86 | |
Others | 2.07 | |
Ultimate Analysis of Adsorbents | ||
Carbon (%) | 56.3 | |
Hydrogen (%) | 4.02 | |
Nitrogen (%) | 4.55 | |
Sulfur (%) | 0.81 | |
EDX AnalysisCarbon | 67.6 | |
Nitrogen | - | |
Oxygen | 26.34 | |
Magnesium | 0.34 | |
Phosphorus | 3.99 | |
Sulfur | 0.29 | |
Potassium | 0.62 | |
Calcium surface Area of Pores (M2/G) | ||
(i) BET | 145 | |
(ii) BJH (adsorption/desorption) | 107/70 | |
BJH cumulative pore volume (cm3/g) | 0.1367 | |
(i) Single Point Total | 0.1287 | |
(ii) BJH adsorption | 0.1132 | |
(iii) BJH desorption | ||
Average Pore Diameter (Ǻ) | ||
(i) BET | 21.7 | |
(ii) BJH adsorption | 30 | |
(iii) BJH desorption | 37 | |
Boehm Titration | ||
Surface acidity (mmol/g) | 5.93 | |
Surface alkalinity (mmol/g) | 2.66 | |
Table 1: Physico-chemical characteristics of NSAC.
α | 0.78 | 0.57 | 0.5 | 0.3 |
ko | 0.4 | 1.073 | 1.662 | 5.3 |
R2 | 0.98 | 0.997 | 0.997 | 1 |
Table 2: Kinetic parameters for the removal of phenol onto NSAC.
7.
Rodriguez-Reinoso F (1997) Activated carbon: Structure
characterization preparation and applications. In: Marsh H, Heintz EA,
Rodriguez-Reinoso F, (Eds.), Introduction to Carbon Technologies Chapter 2: 35.
8.
ISI (1989) Activated carbon powdered and granular-methods
of sampling and tests IS 877. New
Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards.
9.
Eaton AD, Clesceri LS, Greenberg AE (2005) Standard
methods for the examination of water and wastewater. (21st edition),
Washington DC, USA: APHA.
10.
A.I. Vogel., 1969. A text book of quantitative inorganic
analysis. 3rd ed., London: ELBS.
12.
Boehm (2002) Surface oxides on carbon and
their analysis: a critical assessment. Carbon 40: 145-149.
32.
Helfferich F (1962) Ion-Exchange,
McGraw Hills, New York, USA.
34.
Parfitt GD,
Rochester CH (1983) Adsorption from Solution at the Solid/Liquid Interface.
Academic Press Orlando.
36.
Roig MG (2008)
Sorption Processes in Kennedy JF, Cabral JMS. Recovery Processes for Biological Materials Wiley Chic ester 15: 369-414
39.
Young, DM, Crowell AD (1962) Physical
Adsorption of Gases. Butterworths London.
44.
Aharoni C, Sideman Hoffer SE (1979) Adsorption of phosphate
ions by colloid ion-coated alumina. Journal of Chemical Technology and
Biotechnology 29: 404-412.