Research Article

Political Ideology Affects College Student Eating Habits

by Dawson P1*, Martinez-Dawson R2, Northcutt JK1, Armstrong, S1, Babb H1, Beasley W1, Couture J1, Dorn S1, Graber J1, Dow, A1, Harness J1, Nichols M1, Smith C1, Sonefelt K1, Tietz S1

1Department of Food, Nutrition and Packaging Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29624-0316, USA

2Emeritus College, Clemson University, Clemson, SC. 29634, USA

*Corresponding author:Paul Dawson, Department of Food, Nutrition and Packaging Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29624-0316, USA

Received Date: 25 October, 2023

Accepted Date: 21 November, 2023

Published Date: 27 November, 2023

Citation: Dawson P, Martinez-Dawson R, Northcutt JK, Armstrong S, Babb H, et al. (2023) Political Ideology Affects College Student Eating Habits. Food Nutr J 8: 272. https://doi.org/10.29011/2575-7091.100172

Abstract

To determine if there is a link between political ideologies among college students, an online survey was conducted that asked not only political affiliation and eating habits, but also stance on controversial topics such as abortion laws, police funding and national border/immigration policies. Overall, 39, 25.1 and 22.5 % of the respondents identified as Republican, Democrat and Independent, respectively. Ninety percent of Democrats, 100% of Libertarians, and 94% of Republicans identified as omnivores (eating meat and plant-based foods), respectively. In response to a different political ideology question, 2%, 32%, 52%, 12.5%, and 1% described themselves as Communist, Conservative, Moderate, Socialist or Ultra-conservative, respectively. From these political categories 57% of Communists, 95% of Conservatives, 89% of Moderates, 82% of Socialists and 100% of Ultraconservatives were omnivores. A negative correlation was found between respondents that supported opening the U.S. borders and knowledge of food or eating a balance diet. Furthermore a positive correlation was found among respondents who supported police and knowledge of food or eating a balance diet.  Overall, results show that consumer behaviors and self-identity are closely linked, and understanding both may be useful in predicting not only consumer purchase decisions but also views on political and social issues.

Keywords: Political Ideology; College Students; Eating Habits

Introduction

Does political ideology affect eating habits of college students? When it comes to eating habits and preferences, there seems to be a connection to political affiliation and meat consumption. Food is embedded in cultures and lifestyles. Political affiliation and ideology would also be expected to play a possible role in eating patterns. A recent study showed that democrats were more likely to take part in a vegan or vegetarian-based diet [1]. Similarly, food also plays a role in marketing to consumers political leanings, thus affecting their perceptions concerning food. In another study, it was reported that when a certain food advertisement refers to patriotism and traditional values, health claims were less effective and resulted in higher perceptions of health risks for liberals. In continuation, references to social justice and sense of community increased the perception of health risks for conservatives [2]. Markay [3] examined 93,000 Facebook and Instagram advertisements from 25 political campaigns from July to October during the 2022 national election to find trends in how groups of people were targeted. Both Democratic and Republican advertisements targeted people shopping at Walmart 

and Democratic advertisements excluded individuals shopping at Bass Pro while Republican advertisements excluded Whole Foods and Trader Joe’s shoppers. Democrats targeted individuals getting groceries from HelloFresh and Blue Apron while Republicans targeted those who ate at Cracker Barrel and Chick-Fil-A. In the 1992 presidential election, the Democratic nominee won 60% of the counties that had Whole Food stores and only 40% of the counties that had Cracker Barrel restaurants [4]. In 2012, this gap increased to 77% of the counties with Whole Food and 29% of the counties with Cracker Barrel for the Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama. 

Kannan and Veazie [5] reported that political affiliation was associated without multiple health outcomes, including mortality. They found that liberals/democrats were more likely to smoke and drink, whereas conservatives/republicans were more likely to be sedentary (not exercise) and to consume a smaller variety of fruits and vegetables [5]. A more recent study showed that democrats were more likely to take part in a vegan or vegetarian-based diet than republicans [1]. Similarly, food also plays a role in marketing to consumers political leanings, thus affecting their perceptions concerning food.  Boeuf [2] reported that when a certain food advertisement refers to patriotism and traditional values, health claims are less effective and result in higher perceptions of health risks for liberals. Similarly, references to social justice and sense of community in food advertisements increase the perception of health risks for conservatives [2].

Hodson and Earle [6] found that individuals who identify as conservatives consume more meat compared to individuals who identify as liberals. The current and former vegans that are higher in conservative ideology show greater odds of being a former rather than current vegan. People also had differing reasons to begin or quit veganism. Conservatives tended to become a vegan for reasons less centered in animal justice. Meat cravings or lifestyle inconvenience had little effect on an individuals’ choice to consume meat. These same researchers found that ideology and justice concerns are relevant in maintaining vegan status [6]. Around 1/10 of liberals identify as vegetarians and 5% of these individuals say they are vegans [7]. There was an increase in market availability and sales of plant-based products, however, no increase in people converting to vegetarianism or veganism. It appears that Americans are willing to experiment with some of these plant products however, most people are unwilling to completely make the jump to vegetarianism.

Matek Sarić, et al. [8] reported that there were no differences in environmental and political determinants of food choices based on the place of residence, age, gender, and employment status among Croatians. This conflicts with finding in the U.S which show a relationship between environmental and political determinants and food choices [9]. This suggests that government policies have more of an effect on Americans’ diet than the diet of Croatians.

Karami, et al. [10] compared the social media usage of democrats and republicans and how it represents their eating habits, and found that republicans consumed less fruits and vegetables as compared to democrats. Following along the same lines, democrats consumed foods that were minimally processed and contained less fat when compared to republicans. Additionally, democrats had a higher participation rate in special diets such as veganism and vegetarianism than republicans. To gain a clearer understanding of food-related political consumerism among college students, a survey was conducted of undergraduate students attending a Land Grant University in the South.

Methods

A 17-question online survey was randomly administered to 537 college student volunteers specifically responding to a rating scale shown below to each statement.

Figure 1: 17 question survey offered to 537 college student volunteers

The survey was administered using Qualtrics™ online software. An email with the description of the study and a link to the online survey on Qualtrics™ was sent to a random sample of approximately 22,000 eligible undergraduates and graduate students, age 18 and older. This email emphasized that students’ participation in the study was voluntary and confidential, and those who would wish to participate could access the link in the email to complete the survey. The survey was approved by an Institutional Review Board (IRB2021-295) before being disseminated. Participants had access to the survey for two months to facilitate a larger survey response. Responses to the survey were automatically recorded via Qualtrics™ survey software. Data were then exported via an Excel file and imported to SAS® OnDemand for Academics for analysis.

 The surveys were completed between January 2022 and January 2023. A total of 537 responses were collected with a voluntary response rate of 2.4% of the total Undergraduate university population (22,467). The survey had a completion rate of 95%, and the median time to complete the survey was five minutes. Responses were collected and analyzed using descriptive methods to generate means using PCSAS. Spearman’s correlation coefficient was determined pairing questions about political issues and eating habits where the same answer scale was used.

Results

Of the 537 respondents, 58.4% (312) were females, 37.8% (202) were male, 3.6% (19) identified as non-binary, and 0.19% (1) preferred not to respond as to their gender. The respondents came from a general college student population that was 52.5% (11,800) female and 47.5% (10,667) male. The breakdown of respondents by class were 21.1, 25.5, 26.7, and 26.4% for freshman, sophomore, junior, and senior, respectively. Over half (52.0%) of the respondents choose moderate as their political ideology and over 60% of Democrats chose the moderate ideology while almost 68% of Republicans identified conservative as their ideology (Table 1). A third of the Democrats also chose the socialist ideology. Eighty-seven percent of the student population identified as either Democrat (25.4%), Republican (39.7) or Independent (22.6) (Table 2). Females categorized themselves as Republican>Democrat>Independent while males political affiliations followed Republican>Independent>Democrat. Among students identifying as non-binary, they were nearly evenly split among Democrat, Independent and other political affiliations (Table 2). Overall, the majority of students choose moderate as their political ideology with over 55% of females being moderate (Table 3). Males chose conservative as their political ideology most often over any other ideology.

Table 1: Percentage of college students within each political party affiliation identifying in different political ideologies.

Political Ideology

Overall

Democrat

Republican

Independent

Libertarian

Other

% of respondents identifying in each political affiliation

ultra-conservative

1.3

0

1.6

0

0

7.7

conservative

32.0

2.5

67.7

9.0

38.9

0

moderate

52.0

62.5

30.7

82.1

61.1

42.3

socialist

12.5

33.8

0

6.0

0

34.6

communist

2.2

11.3

0

3.0

0

15.0

Table 2: Percentages of college students of different genders segmented by political affiliation.

Political affiliation

overall

Female

Male

Non-binary

% of respondents identifying in each gender category

Democrat

25.4

30.1

17.3

33.3

Republican

39.7

36.9

48.0

0

Independent

22.6

21.6

23.3

38.1

Libertarian

6.0

6.8

5.4

0

Other

6.4

5.3

5.9

28.6

Table 3: Percentages of college students of different political ideology segmented by gender.

Political Ideology

overall

Female

Male

Non-binary

% of respondents identifying in each gender category

Ultra-conservative

1.2

1.9

2.0

0.0

Conservative

32.0

37.7

45.8

0.0

Moderate

52.0

57.2

40.3

15.8

Socialist

12.5

12.5

11.4

57.9

Communist

2.2

0.6

0.5

26.3

Omnivore (meat and plant-based diet) was the overwhelming most popular self-described diet with 90% of all students in the category (Table 4).  A higher percentage of Independents chose the ovo-lacto vegetarian (eggs and dairy product included, not meat) and ovo-vegetarian (eggs included, no meat or dairy) diets compared to the other political affiliations. 

Table 4: Percentage of college student respondents identifying in different diets overall and by political party affiliation.

Self-identified diet

% of respondents in each category

Overall

Republican

Democrat

Independent

Libertarian

Other

Omnivore (meat and plant-based foods)

89.7

94.5

90.0

82.1

100.0

80.8

Ovo-lacto-vegetarian (eggs and dairy, no meat)

2.2

0

3.8

4.5

0

3.9

Ovo-vegetarian (includes eggs, no meat or dairy)

1,3

0

1.3

4.5

0

0

Pescatarian (no meat except fish)

1.3

0

2.5

0

0

7.7

Vegan (no products from animals)

1.0

0

2.5

1.5

0

0

Other  diet

4.7

5.5

0

7.5

0

7.7

For stores typically used for food purchases, Wal-Mart, Publix, Ingles and Aldi have stores in close proximity to the university while the other stores listed do not have stores within 15 of the university which may explain why these stores were higher overall for preferred shopping locations (Table 5). Respondents were allowed to choose multiple stores in their response thus the number of times a store was chosen was tabulated for the calculating the percentage of store choices and the total adds up to more than 100%. A chi-square analysis of the four stores in close proximity to the university found no significant (p≤0.05) association between political party affiliation and store choice. In general, Republicans and Independents preferred shopping at Publix compared to Democrats and Libertarians, while Democrats and Independents preferred Trader Joe’s relative to Republicans and Libertarians (Table 5). There are multiple considerations that factor into consumer preferences including, but not limited to proximity of stores to residence, pricing and price promotion factors, product inventory, store appearance (cleanliness and display) and familiarity with store lay-out. However, it is important to note that two of the stores listed in the survey do not use traditional means to advertising and have limited product choices on their shelves for specific commodities (for example, one type of spring mix salad). On average, these two stores tend to have lower prices, but that did not seem to make them more attractive to students (Table 5).

Table 5: Percentage of college students that typically purchase food at the stores listed.

Store typically used for food purchases

% of respondents in each category shopping at different stores

Overall

Republican

Democrat

Independent

Libertarian

Other

Walmart

47.3

49.3

43.0

50.0

56.3

40.0

Ingles

19.3

23.7

11.1

16.8

21.9

25.7

Publix

48.1

52.6

42.2

52.9

40.6

34.3

Aldi

24.9

23.2

25.2

26.9

28.1

25.7

Trader Joe’s

13.1

8.5

18.5

17.7

9.4

5.7

Costco

12.5

13.7

9.6

16.0

9.4

8.6

Whole Foods

5.6

5.2

9.6

4.2

0.0

2.9

Dollar General

2.8

1.0

5.2

0.8

6.3

8.6

Other

4.4

11.9

9.6

12.6

9.4

14.3

Less than 10% of respondents obtained their news from newspapers while over 50% listed other sources for news including the internet (Table 6). The percentage of college students listing Fox News as a typical news source was 49% Republicans and 2% Democrats. Conversely, the CNN party breakdown was 30% Democrat and 9% Republican.

Table 6: Percentage of college students that typically obtain their news from the sources listed.

News source

% of respondents in each category obtaining news from different sour

ces

Overall

Republican

Democrat

Independent

Libertarian

Other

Newspaper

9.9

8.5

11.9

13.5

3.1

5.7

Networks (ABC, NBC, CBS)

29.8

27.3

36.5

28.2

15.6

20.2

CNN

15.7

8.5

29.6

14.3

6.3

20.0

MSNBC

3.4

26.5

36.3

30.3

18.8

20.0

Fox News

22.6

48.8

2.2

5.9

18.8

5.7

Other (internet)

51.2

40.3

45.9

62.2

78.1

77.1

All political affiliation groups were over 90% likely (extremely or somewhat) to vote in the next national election except for Independents and other categories (Table 7).

Table 7: Percentage of college student responses to the question; “How likely are you to vote in the next national election?”.

Likelihood of voting in the national election

Percentage of responses for each student population

Overall

Republican

Democrat

Independent

Libertarian

Other

Extremely likely

78.7

83.5

90.0

61.2

77.8

69.2

Somewhat likely

11.6

8.8

11.8

16.4

16.7

3.9

Neither likely or unlikely

3.5

1.2

2.4

4.5

0.0

15.4

Somewhat unlikely

2.5

0.0

1.6

7.5

0.0

0.0

Extremely unlikely

3.8

0.0

0.8

10.5

5.6

11.5

There was general similarity across political party lines on the likelihood of purchasing raw, unpackaged fresh produce with all groups over 70% likely to purchase raw produce except for the other category (Table 8). Similarly, over 50% of respondents from all political persuasions were likely to pay attention to nutrient facts on food labels (Table 9).

Table 8: Percentage of college student responses to the question; “How likely are you to purchase raw, unpackaged produce?”.

Likelihood of purchasing raw, unpackaged produce

Percentage of responses for each student population

Overall

Republican

Democrat

Independent

Libertarian

Other

Extremely likely

40.8

40.9

43.8

34.3

44.4

46.2

Somewhat likely

37.0

34.7

41.3

41.8

38.9

19.2

Neither likely or unlikely

9.4

11.0

7.5

6.0

16.7

11.5

Somewhat unlikely

8.5

8.7

6.3

11.9

0.0

11.5

Extremely unlikely

4.4

4.7

1.3

6.0

0.0

11.5

Table 9: Percentage of college student responses to the question; “How likely are you to pay attention to the nutrient facts on the label of what you are eating?.

Likelihood of paying attention to nutrition facts

Percentage of responses for each student population

Overall

Republican

Democrat

Independent

Libertarian

Other

Extremely likely

23.5

26.0

12.5

23.9

33.3

38.5

Somewhat likely

38.9

38.6

50.0

32.8

27.8

30.8

Neither likely or unlikely

10.7

14.2

7.0

7.5

11.1

3.9

Somewhat unlikely

16.6

13.4

15.0

23.9

11.1

23.1

Extremely unlikely

16.3

7.9

13.8

11.9

16.7

3.9

Only 3.2% of Republicans agreed (strongly or somewhat) with having open U.S. borders while 30% of Democrats and 33% of Libertarians agreed with this statement (Table 10). Twelve and 38% of Independents and those in the other category agreed with open borders, respectively.

Table 10: Percentage of college student responses to the statement; “The US border should be completely open with no restrictions on who can enter.”

Abortions should be legal with some restrictions

Percentage of responses for each student population

Overall

Republican

Democrat

Independent

Libertarian

Other

Strongly agree

26.7

7.9

41.3

31.3

50.0

42.3

Somewhat agree

34.8

24.4

45.0

41.8

33.3

38.5

Neither agree or disagree

10.3

11.8

8.8

13.4

11.1

0.0

Somewhat disagree

12.2

22.8

3.8

10.5

0.0

0.0

Strongly disagree

16.0

33.1

1.3

3.0

5.6

19.2

On the topic of abortions being legal with some restrictions, 86, 72, 83 and 81 % of Democrats, Independents, Libertarians, and other political affiliations agreed (strongly or somewhat) with this statement while only 32% of Republicans agreed (Table 11). Interestingly, for the right of gun ownership, 85, 80, 84, and 76 % of Republicans, Independents, Libertarians, and other parties agreed (strongly or somewhat) with this statement while only 52% of Democrats agreed with the right to gun ownership (Table 12). Thus, Democrats aligned with other parties except Republicans on the abortion issue while Republicans were similar to other parties except for Democrats on the gun issue.

Table 11: Percentage of college student responses to the statement; “Abortions should be legal but with some restrictions after the fetus can survive outside the womb.”

U.S. border should be completely open

Percentage of responses for each student population

Overall

Republican

Democrat

Independent

Libertarian

Other

Strongly agree

4.4

0.8

7.5

1.5

0.0

19.2

Somewhat agree

12.0

2.4

22.5

10.5

33.3

19.2

Neither agree or disagree

10.3

6.3

15.0

16.4

5.6

3.9

Somewhat disagree

32.9

22.1

43.8

4.8

27.8

34.6

Strongly disagree

46.4

68.5

11.3

29.9

38.9

23.1

Table 12: Percentage of college student responses to the statement; “I believe US citizens should have the right to own a gun with a background check.”

U.S. citizens should have the right to own a gun

Percentage of responses for each student population

Overall

Republican

Democrat

Independent

Libertarian

Other

Strongly agree

39.8

63.8

10.0

29.9

38.9

38.5

Somewhat agree

36.1

22.8

42.5

50.8

44.4

38.5

Neither agree or disagree

7.5

6.3

11.3

4.5

11.1

7.7

Somewhat disagree

11.0

5.5

25.0

9.0

5.6

3.9

Strongly disagree

5.6

1.6

11.3

6.0

0.0

11.5

There was overwhelming (>80%) agreement (strongly or somewhat) with the statement about supporting police except for the other political category (Table 13).

Table 13: Percentage of college student responses to the statement; “Police should be supported but prosecuted for misconduct.”

Police should be supported

Percentage of responses for each student population

Overall

Republican

Democrat

Independent

Libertarian

Other

Strongly agree

61.6

73.2

41.8

73.1

72.2

30.8

Somewhat agree

27.0

19.7

41.8

23.9

16.7

30.1

Neither agree or disagree

6.0

6.3

8.9

3.0

5.6

3.9

Somewhat disagree

2.2

0.8

2.5

0.0

0.0

15.1

Strongly disagree

3.1

0.0

5.1

0.0

5.6

19.2

A greater percentage of Republicans (85.9%) and Independents (81%) than Democrats (66.3%) agreed (strongly or somewhat) about feeling knowledgeable about the foods they eat (Table 14).

Similarly, 80% of Republicans and only 51% of Democrats agreed (strongly or somewhat) that they eat a healthy balance of protein, carbohydrates, and fats (Table 15). And over 80% of all students and student within each party affiliation reported eating “fast food” 2 or fewer days per week (Table 16).

Table 14: Percentage of college student responses to the statement; “I feel knowledgeable about the foods I should be putting into my body to fuel it, and make an effort to implement what I know into my diet.”

Knowledgeable about the foods I eat

Percentage of responses for each student population

Overall

Republican

Democrat

Independent

Libertarian

Other

Strongly agree

34.8

39.4

25.0

25.0

33.3

42.3

Somewhat agree

41.7

46.5

41.3

56.3

44.4

26.8

Neither agree or disagree

9.1

6.3

6.2

6.3

5.6

5.0

Somewhat disagree

11.9

6.3

22.5

12.5

16.7

11.5

Strongly disagree

2.5

1.6

5.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

Table 15: Percentage of college student responses to the statement; “I eat a healthy balance of proteins, carbs, and fats.”

I eat a healthy balance of protein, carbs and fats

Percentage of responses for each student population

Overall

Republican

Democrat

Independent

Libertarian

Other

Strongly agree

24.9

25.4

11.1

21.9

27.8

32.0

Somewhat agree

46.7

54.8

40.0

37.5

27.8

44.0

Neither agree or disagree

12.2

11.1

15.0

9.4

16.7

8.0

Somewhat disagree

14.2

7.1

23.8

31.3

27.8

12.0

Strongly disagree

2.5

1.6

5.0

0.0

0.0

4.0

Table 16: Percentage of college student responses to the questions; “How many days a week do you eat fast food?”.

How many days per week do you eat fast food

Percentage of responses for each student population

Overall

Republican

Democrat

Independent

Libertarian

Other

Never

14.5

12.3

14.1

21.0

6.3

14.5

1-2 days

68.9

68.2

72.6

63.0

81.3

67.9

3-4 days

14.9

18.5

11.1

14.3

9.4

14.9

5.6 days

1.3

0.5

2.2

0.8

3.1

1.3

Everyday

0.4

0.5

0.0

0.8

0.0

0.4

Spearman Correlations

Spearman correlation coefficients were generated to compare questions dealing with political issues and eating habits when the same response scale was used. This includes questions on political issue (questions 7, 9, 10, 11, and 12) and eating habit (questions 8, 13, 14, 16, and 17). Reponses to the question supporting open borders were significantly and negatively correlated to both knowledge of food and eating a balanced diet (Table 17). Those that supported opening U.S. borders reported having less knowledge about food and less knowledge about healthy eating. Conversely the question on supporting police was positively correlated to food knowledge and eating a balanced diet. The question on supporting police was significantly and positively correlated to eating fast food. These correlations are not surprising considering that identity and consumer behaviors are closely linked, and as Bauer and Reisch [11] stated decisions about food may be influenced by individual (psychological, physical, and neurological), social and environmental factors. In their study of food choice among urban adults, IIic, et al. [12] reported two broad categories of overlapping motivations – the first included emotions and health, while the second focused more on environmental and political motivators that tended to dominate food choices. These findings agree with those of Niva and Jallinoja [13] who studied political food consumption and stated that people’s food choices are based on multiple considerations that include politics, ethics and environmental factors combined with other considerations (such as health). Niva and Jallinoja [13] also examined buycotting (favoring) or boycotting (avoiding) foods for social, cultural and animal-related concerns that went beyond the household needs and they suggested that these two behaviors were more common among the following groups:  women, the highly educated, the political “left,” those who donate to charity, those whose food choices were motivated by domestic origin and ethical food production, those who felt that certain institutions (such as the media, institutional actors) could advance ethical food production and consumption.

Furst, et al. [14] suggested that food choices were based on life course, influences, and an individuals’ personal system. According Furst and coworkers [14], life course included the social, cultural and physical environments to which a person has been and is exposed. These researchers concluded that the influences from a person’s life course determine their conscious and unconscious values that appear during a choice situation, such as a food purchase decisions or support of border control. Sobal, et al. [15] (2009) concluded that food choices are multifaceted, situational, and dynamic. As such, there is a relationship between our opinions on food, politics and social justice [11,16]. Consequently, self-identity is closely linked with consumer behaviors and affects why we make certain purchase decisions.

Table 17: Spearman correlation coefficients and probability values for political and eating-related questions.

Q8 buy produce

Q13 eat fast food

Q14 read nutrient labels

Q16 food knowledge

Q17 eat healthy

Q7 vote in next election

P=0.06

P=0.68

P=0.70

P=0.54

P=0.70

Q9 open borders

P=0.21

P=0.90

P=0.34

P=0.01 Negative

P=0.001 Negative

Q10 abortion legal/restrictions

P=0.79

P=0.75

P=0.32

P=0.66

P=0.64

Q11 gun ownership

P=0.62

P=0.01

Positive

P=0.11

P=0.23

P=0.37

Q12 police support

P=0.0.87

P=0.33

P=0.71

P=0.05

Positive

P=0.03

Positive

References

  1. Mosier SL, Rimal AP (2020) Where’s the meat? An evaluation of diet and partisanship identification. British Food Journal.
  2. Boeuf B (2019) Political ideology and health risk perceptions of food. Social Science & Medicine 236: 112405.
  3. Markay L (2022) Targeting Two Americas. Axios Media Trends accessed 10-10-2023.
  4. Elving R, Boyd N (2013) Does where you shop depend on where you stand? National Public Radio. Does Where You Shop Depend On Where You Stand? : It’s All Politics : NPR accessed 10-10-2023.
  5. Kannan VD, Veazie PJ (2018, June 22) Political orientation, political environment, and health behaviors in the United States. Preventive Medicine 114: 95-101.
  6. Hodson G, Earle M (2017) Conservatism predicts lapses from vegetarian/vegan diets to meat consumption (through lower social justice concerns and social support). Appetite 120: 75-81.
  7. Reinhart RJ (2021) Snapshot: Few Americans vegetarian or vegan. Gallup.com. Retrieved October 21, 2022.
  8. Matek Sarić M, Jasic K, Culin J, Guine R (2020) Environmental and Political Determinants of Food Choices: A Preliminary Study in a Croatian Sample.” MDPI, Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute 7: 103.
  9. Mozaffarian D, et al. (2018) “Role of Government Policy in NutritionBarriers to and Opportunities for Healthier Eating.” BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), U.S. National Library of Medicine 361: k2426.
  10. Karami A, Dahl AA, Shaw G, Jr Valappil SP, Turner-McGrievy G, et al. (2021) Analysis of Social Media Discussions on (#)Diet by Blue, Red, and Swing States in the U.S. Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) 9: 518.
  11. Bauer JM, Reisch LA (2019) Behavioral insights and (un) healthy dietary choices: A review of current evidence. J Consum Policy 42: 3-45.
  12. IIic A, I Rumbak, D Dizdaric, MM Saric, IC Baric, et al. (2023) Motivations associated with food choices among adults from urban setting. Foods 12: 3546.
  13. Niva M, Jallinoja P (2018) Taking a stand through food choices? Characteristics of political food consumption and consumers in Finland. Ecological Economics 154: 349-360.
  14. Furst T, Connors M, Bisogni CA, Sobal J, Falk LW (1996) Food choice: A conceptual model of the process. Appetite 26: 247–266.
  15. Sobal J, Bisogni CA (2009) Constructing food choice decisions. Ann Behav Med 38: s37–s46.
  16. Leng G, Adan RA, Belot M, Brunstrom JM, De Graaf K, et al, (2017) The determinants of food choice. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 76: 316-327.

© by the Authors & Gavin Publishers. This is an Open Access Journal Article Published Under Attribution-Share Alike CC BY-SA: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International License. With this license, readers can share, distribute, download, even commercially, as long as the original source is properly cited. Read More.

Food & Nutrition Journal

rumus slot mahjongrtp slot gacorfitur slot mahjong winsrekomendasi slot pragmartp live slotpola gates of gatotkacaapk cheat slotzeus godwrath maxwinmitra slot dana resmihabanero anti gagalserver kamboja gacordaftar link togelslot pg mahjongtrik pola zeus x500slot gacor mudah menangslot mahjong pragmaticpola trik slot mahjongrtp fortune dragonrtp slot speed winnerslot kamboja mahjong waystrik mantap slot olympusnaga hitam mahjongslot tergacor mahjongtrik jitu cuan mahjongpola slot mahjong winsrtp tinggi pragmaticslot mahjong onlineslot gacor hari inislot bonanza gacorfreebet mahjong winsserver jp rtp tinggigame resmi pragmatic terbaiktaktik efektif mahjongpola mahjong rekomendasi googleaztec gems boskututorial mahjong ways2starlight princess hari inipola starlight princessrtp fortune tigerrtp pg softrtp starlight princesstrik mahjong waysperkalian x5000 banditoslot mahjong waysslot terbaik olympusslot gates of olympusdaftar slot dana maxwinbocoran pola olympusmaxwin slot bonanzabocoran rtp tinggislot samurai codemetode slot starlightslot zeusrtp slot gacor pragmaticrtp slot pg softcara menang slot onlinescatter slot mahjongslot gacor server luar rekomendasi link olympusgerbang gatot kacartp kakek olympusslot gacor andalanrtp slot pgslot mahjongslot mahjong server jepangperkalian besar starlightrtp ways of qilinslot terbaik mahjongmahjong bulan mudastrategi permainan pragmaticcheat engine gacorjackpot auto cuanmahjong mekanik tinggitrik slot mahjongtips main slotslot server thailandpola mahjong unguslot gacor menangpg soft scatterslot olympusbocoran togel terpercayaamantotorm1131aman toto