Socio-Economic Status of Jenukuruba Tribal Women: A Case Study of Chamarajanagara District, Karnataka
BR Manjunatha*,
MR Gangadhar
Citation: Manjunatha BR, Gangadhar MR (2017) Socio-Economic Status of Jenukuruba Tribal Women: A Case Study of Chamarajanagara District, Karnataka. Anthropol Open Acc: AOAP-101. DOI: 10.29011/AOAP-101/100001
1.
1. Introduction
Socioeconomic status is
an intricate concept covering of two different aspects, the social
aspect that includes status or position in a social stratification and the
economic aspects that includes resources such as income, occupation and wealth.
Even though there is no generally accepted definition of the term
“Socioeconomic status”, so we get to see heterogeneous definition by writers
and scholars. Socioeconomic status is a construct that reflects one’s access to
collectively desired resources, be they material goods, money, power,
friendship networks, healthcare, leisure time, or educational opportunities [1]. Furthermore, it has
been defined as the position that an individual or family occupies with
reference to the prevailing average standards of cultural possessions,
effective income, material possessions and participation in the group
activities of the community [2]. Very
often it is measured as a combination of various factors such as education,
income and occupation. Therefore, it can be said that socioeconomic status is
not a unitary concept and with this concept in mind, for the present study
socio-economic status is measured by using some of the prominent factors such
as social factors, demographic factors and economic factors [3]. Women in a tribal society play a vital
role in their social, cultural, economic and religious ways of life and are considered
as an economic asset in their society. But they are still lagging far behind in
the various walks of life like education, employment, good health and economic
empowerment etc. Empowering may be understood as enabling weaker sections like poor
women, especially tribal women to acquire and to possess power and resources,
in order to make decisions on their own After the analysis of the data and
field observation, it is revealed that lack of education, poor health status
and infant mortality rate, low level of wage work, lack of self-employment
opportunity, organizing capacity and leadership quality are the main obstacles
to the economic empowerment of tribal women [4].Socio-economic profile is an important
role in characterize the social life and behavior of an individual. It is,
therefore, essential to analyze the socio-economic background of the Tribal
women and to understand the pattern of relationship between Tribal women and
local environment. In Indian society, caste and kinship has been influencing on
the social life and acute disparity in terms of standard of living and sub-culture
among various groups and regions exist, a study of the socio-economic
conditions of a leader would help to reveal the sociological significance. At
the same time, socio-economic stratification determines the structure of
political power [5].
·
To study the socioeconomic status of Jenukuruba women in
Chamarajanagara district of Karnataka.
·
To find out the educational Level of Jenukuruba Tribal women
in the study area.
· To examine the factor influencing on the socioeconomic status of Jenukuruba women study area.
4. Methods of the study
Marital status is also a social indicator for understanding the
socio-economic status of women. Early marriage system has been one of the important
characteristics of Jenukuruba community. Marital status changes the women's
status. It also changes the women's role and increases the duties and workload
of the women. The marital status of the respondent is shown in the table below.
The education is a fundamental right that provides
opportunities for socio-economic uplift. In India many reasons associated with
not educating girl child are financial constraints, early marriages,
submissiveness, motherhood, and parental perception of education on women’s
worldview. The educational status is divided into 7 categories which are illiterate,
Lower primary level, Higher primary level, high school level, Pre-University level,
under graduation and above, also other professional course. The education
status of the respondent is shown in the table below.
8. Occupational Status
9. Landholding
10. Annual Income of the Family
Health condition can be taken as another important socio-economic
indicator. Even in this modern era quite a large number of people including
tribes believe in superstition practices, preferring the Shamanas and healers. Preferred
place of treatment by the respondent women has been present below:
11. Cause of Low Socio-economic Status of Respondents
12. Conclusion
Type of Family |
Frequency |
Percentage |
Nuclear family |
105 |
87.5 |
Join family |
11 |
9.2 |
Extended family |
4 |
3.3 |
Total |
120 |
100 |
Table 1: Type of family.
Age group |
Frequency |
percentage |
Below 20 years |
07 |
5.8 |
21-30 years |
28 |
23.3 |
31-40 years |
42 |
35.0 |
41-50 years |
17 |
14.2 |
51-60 y |
15 |
12.5 |
Above 60 years |
11 |
9.2 |
Total |
120 |
100 |
Table 2: Age of respondent.
Marital status |
Frequency |
Percentage |
Married |
82 |
68.3 |
Unmarried |
13 |
10.8 |
Widow |
18 |
15.0 |
Divorced/separated |
7 |
5.9 |
Total |
120 |
100 |
Table 3: Marital status of respondent.
Level of Education |
Frequency |
Percentage |
Illiterate |
49 |
40.8 |
Lower Primary |
33 |
27.5 |
Higher Primary |
18 |
15.0 |
High school |
10 |
8.3 |
PUC |
06 |
5.0 |
UG and Above |
02 |
1.7 |
Professional Course |
02 |
1.7 |
total |
120 |
100 |
Table 4: Educational status of respondent.
Type of Occupation |
Frequency |
Percentage |
Agricultural |
20 |
16.7 |
Agriculture labour |
53 |
44.2 |
Collection of minor forest product |
29 |
24.1 |
Govt. service |
4 |
3.3 |
Any Other |
14 |
11.7 |
Total |
120 |
100 |
Table 5: Occupational structure of respondent.
Land holdings |
Frequency |
Percentage |
No Land |
49 |
40.8 |
Below 2 Acre |
54 |
45.0 |
2 to 4 acre |
10 |
8.3 |
Above 4 Acre |
7 |
5.9 |
total |
120 |
100 |
Table 6: Type of land.
Income in RS |
Frequency |
Percentage |
Up to 10000 |
34 |
28.4 |
10,001-20,000 |
57 |
47.5 |
20,001-30,000 |
19 |
15.8 |
30,001-40,000 |
06 |
5.0 |
Above 40,000 |
04 |
3.3 |
total |
120 |
100 |
Table 7: Annual family income of respondent.
Place of treatment |
Frequency |
Percentage |
Govt. Hospital |
66 |
55.0 |
Private Hospital |
28 |
23.3 |
Traditional healers and temple |
22 |
18.4 |
Don’t go anywhere |
4 |
3.3 |
Total |
120 |
100 |
Table 8: Preferred Place of Treatment by respondent.
7. Ajay
Saraogi (2013) Status
of Tribal Women in India.
9. Franzmann Majella
(1999) Women and Religion. Oxford University Press.
11.
Veen Bashi (2007)
Status of Tribal women 1: 1-16.
14. Mishra BK (2009) Status of tribal women
in Orissa. In: M. Das and P. Daspattanayak, (Ed.) Empowering women issues,
challenges and strategies. New Delhi Dominant Publishers and Distributors Pvt.
Ltd 203-209.