Sub-acute Toxicity Profile of Methanol Leaf Extract of Lophira lanceolata (Ochnaceae) in Rats
Collins Azubuike Onyeto*, Stella Ihim, Benjamin Emesiani, Peter Achunike Akah, Sylvester Chukwuemeka Nworu
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria
*Corresponding author: Collins Azubuike Onyeto, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Nigeria, Nsukka 410001, Nigeria. Tel: +2348034004221; Email: collins.onyeto@unn.edu.ng
Received Date: 11 September, 2018; Accepted Date: 24
September, 2018; Published Date: 02 October, 2018
Citation: Onyeto CA, Ihim S, Emesiani B, Akah PA, Nworu SC (2018) Sub-acute Toxicity Profile of Methanol Leaf Extract of Lophira lanceolata (Ochnaceae) in Rats. Int J Appl Res Med Plants: IJARMP-105. DOI :10.29011/ IJARMP -105. 100005
1. Abstract
Toxicological profiling is a crucial component of plant product evaluation. The aim of this study was to examine the sub-acute toxicity of the methanol leaf extract of Lophira lanceolata. L. lanceolata is a plant native to Africa and is widely used in Nigeria to relieve a wide variety of symptoms. Fresh leaves were collected, dried, ground and extracted by maceration in 70 % methanol for 72 hr. The oral LD50 testing was evaluated and sub-acute toxicity studies were carried out using haematological parameters and liver enzyme markers as indices. Blood samples were collected by retro-bulbar route after fourteen days’ administration of the extract and analyzed for alteration in haematological parameters and serum liver enzymes level. Results revealed no significant (p > 0.05) alteration in the levels of serum liver enzymes, viz; Alanine aminotransferase (ALT), Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) after 14 days of administration of the extract. The lymphocytes and total white blood cell counts were increased in a non-dose dependent manner. The weights of the liver, kidney and heart were not significantly (p > 0.05) altered. The body weights, food and water consumption did not change significantly following the extract administration. The study revealed the relative safety of the leaf extract of Lophira lanceolata.
2. Keywords: Lophira lanceolata; Liver Enzymes; Lymphocytes; Sub-Acute Toxicity; White Blood Cells
3.
Introduction
An estimated 80 % of the world population depends on traditional medicine and
plant-derived medicines for health care [1]. Intensive
research on medicinal plants for bioactivity and lead compounds that could be
developed into pure drugs for the treatment of ailments plaguing humans are
been carried out in many laboratories worldwide [2].
The increasing consumption of natural products from plants as medicines and
health supplements emphasizes the need for toxicity evaluation of medicinal
plants. Efforts are being made in the area of herbal medicine to identify the
bioactive compounds, elucidate their molecular structures, and establish their
mechanisms of action and potential toxicological profile.
Lophira lanceolata is a wild oil seed plant from savannah regions which grows up to 12 m tall
with twisted short branches. The fruits and seeds are rich in oils
mainly polyunsaturated fatted acids such as α-linoleic (>30 % w/w) and
arachidonic (>14% w/w) acids [3] used as
edible oils, in cosmetics, soap making and for medicinal purposes. Traditionally, its leaves are used to treat stomach pain and to control
cough [4]. The leaves are natural aphrodisiac and
fertility enhancer in males [5], and the
infusion is used in treating malaria and jaundice [6].
The plant has been reported to have antidiabetic and antilipidemic [7], antiplasmodial and antioxidant [8], and anthelmintic. [9] activities. The leaves were found to contain flavonoids, anthraquinones, carbohydrate,
glycoside, phenols, saponins, steroids, tannins, and free reducing sugar [10]. Considering the wide folkloric uses, as well as
the reported biological activities of the leaf, this study was aimed at
investigating sub-acute toxic effect of leaf extract of Lophira lanceolata employing some biochemical and hematological
parameters.
4.
Materials and Methods
4.1.
Chemicals, Solvents
and Reagents
All the chemicals and reagents used for this experiment were of analytical
grade products of May and Baker (England) and Merck, Darmstadt (Germany).
4.2.
Animals
Adult albino rats of either sex (100-150 g), obtained from the Animal House
Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Nigeria, Nsukka were used for
this study. Animal studies were conducted in compliance with the National
Institute of Health Guide for Care and use of Laboratory Animals (Pub. No
85-23, revised 1985), and in accordance with the University of Nigeria Ethical
Committee on the use of laboratory animals. The animals were housed in a well-ventilated
room with a 12/12 h light/dark condition and ambient room temperature. They
were maintained on standard feed pellets and water ad libitum throughout the duration of the experiment.
4.3.
Equipment
Heparinized and non-heparinsed capillary tubes, plastacine, test tubes,
sample bottles, UV Spectrophotometer
(Merck, Germany), Incubator, Micro capillary tube (Marrenfeld, Germany), Microheamatocit Centrifuge
(Hawksley, England), Microheamatocit reader
(Hawksley, England), Heamocytometer Set, Diluting Pipette (Hawksley,
England), Automatic pipette (Superfit equipment
Anies), Haemoglobinometer kit (Morienfeld,
Germany), Laboratory Tally Counter (Clay Adams, New Jersey), light
Microscope (Leica Inc, USA), Differential
Cover Slips (Surgifriend Medicals, England).
4.4.
Collection
Fresh leaves of Lophira lanceolata
were collected in May 2013 from Nsukka, Nsukka Local Government Area of Enugu
State, Nigeria. The plant was identified by Mr. Alfred Ozioko of International
Center for Ethnomedicine and Drug Development (Inter CED) Nsukka.
4.5.
Extraction
The leaves of the plant were air-dried at room temperature and ground into
powder using a grinder (ADDIS Nigeria). The powdered material (2.37 kg) was
macerated with 4.5 liters of 70 % methanol for 72 h with constant shaking. The
resultant mixture was filtered using Whatman No. 1 filter paper and the
filtrate was concentrated to dryness in vacuum at 40ºC using rotary evaporator. This gave a yield of
108.81g (4.59 % w/w).
4.6.
Sub-acute Toxicity
Study
The animals were fasted overnight and were divided into four groups of five
per group and treated as follows. Group 1 rats served as control and were given
distilled water (10 ml/kg). Groups 2, 3 and 4 received 100, 400 and 1000 mg/kg of
the extract administered orally for two weeks and the animals were regularly
checked for any signs of toxicity. On day 0 and 14, blood was collected and
subjected to hematological and biochemical tests.
The total white blood cell counts, and differential white
blood cell counts were carried out according to the method of Docie and Lewis [11] while the assays of Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) and
Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) activities were performed as described by Retaman
and Frankel [12], while Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) activity was
determined by the phenolphthalein monophosphate method for in vitro determinations using Quimica Clinica
Applicada (QCA) test kit, Spain [12].
4.7.
Body Weight, Food
Intake, Water Consumption and Mortality
Body weights were measured before the treatment, and on days 7 and 14 post
treatment. Food and water intake were monitored. The animals were
observed for possible physical and behavioural changes and mortality within the
experimental period [13].
4.8.
Organ Weights
The heart, liver and kidneys were carefully excised, examined
macroscopically and weighed.
4.9.
Statistical Analysis
Results were expressed as mean ± SEM. Data
obtained were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and subjected to Dunnet Post Hoc test using
Graph Pad Prism Version 5. Differences between means were accepted significant
at p < 0.05.
5.
Results
5.1.
Effect of L. lanceolata Leaf Extract on ALT, AST and ALP in Treated
Groups of Rats
Treatment with the methanol leaf extract of L.
lanceolata did not cause any significant (p > 0.05) increase in
serum alkaline phosphatase, alanine aminotransferase
and aspartate aminotransferase (Table 1).
5.2.
Effect of the Extract on Total White Blood Cell
Count and Differential Leucocytes Counts
Hematological analysis revealed no significant (p>0.05) change in the hematological parameters of the treatment groups as compared
to the control group (Tables 2 and 3).
5.3.
Effect of the Extract
on Gross Morphology
The animals were healthy with no differences being noted with respect to
the control group. No significant changes were observed in the body weight of
treated groups as compared to control and no mortality was observed during the
experimental procedures. Oral administration of the extracts did
not produce any symptoms of toxicity in rats. There were no deaths or any
obvious signs of toxicity within the period. There was no evidence of changes
in the skin, fur, eyes, sleep, salivation, faecal output and gross behaviour.
Feed and water consumptions did not significantly alter, and the liver, kidney and heart weights were not significantly affected by
treatment with the extract (Table 4).
6.
Discussion
Liver function tests are useful in the evaluation of hepatic dysfunction.
Some of the biochemical markers usually considered are serum bilirubin, alanine
aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and ratio of aminotransferases,
alkaline phosphatase, gamma glutamyl transferase, 5’ nucleotidase,
ceruloplasmin and α-fetoprotein [14]. These
enzymes and the end products of metabolic pathways are very sensitive and their
elevated levels in the serum may serve as indication of liver damage.
Predominantly raised alkaline phosphatase represents the cholestatic pattern of
biliary pathology, while predominantly raised alanine and aspartate
aminotransferases represent the hepatocellular pattern of hepatocellular
pathology [15]. Beyond the liver function tests,
prothrombin time provides another marker of liver synthetic function and a low
platelet count suggests portal hypertension.
In many developing countries, herbal medicines continue to receive
attention as alternatives to synthetic Pharmaceutical products [16] and are generally considered safe and effective.
In addition, bioactive compounds isolated from these herbal products are
generally considered safe and used as over- the-counter products. Administration
of these herbal medicines for a long period without expert delineating their
potential side effects might be hazardous. [17].
In the present study, oral administration of the methanol
leaf extract of L.
lanceolata for 14 days did not elicit any
signs of toxicity. Acute toxicity study of stem bark of L. lanceolata revealed
oral LD50 greater than 5, 000 mg/kg. [18] indicating the safety of this plant.
Drug induced toxicity is one of the leading causes of hepatoxicity and the assessment
of liver function serves as a diagnostic tool [19].
Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) are
commonly assayed for in the serum to assess liver damage [20]. Unfortunately, extra hepatic injury such as
muscle injury, can also lead to elevations in ALT, making ALT not entirely
hepato-specific [21]. Despite the fact that
extrahepatic injury can lead to increase in ALT, serum ALT remains the most
widely used and universally accepted biomarker for liver damage, [22]. Oral administration of the methanol leaf extract
of Lophira Lanceolata did not exert any
significant change in the activities of AST, ALT and ALP enzymes suggesting no deleterious
effect on the liver.
The extract did not have any significant effect on the lymphocytes and
total white blood cell counts, thus, the extract is devoid of any serious
inflammation or damage to body cells, tissues and organs.
Organ weight changes can be sensitive indicators of target organ toxicity,
and significant changes in organ weights may occur in the absence of changes in
other pathologic parameters [23]. In this study,
the extract did not cause any significant change in the weight of the three
vital organs, indicating the absence of target organ toxicity. From the
previous studies 100 mg/kg of the extract has been found effective in malaria [8] and can be used for clinical studies and
treatment. Moreover, since the LD50
is above 5 g/kg, a dose up to 200 mg/kg is still acceptable.
7.
Conclusion
These results strongly suggest that the leaf extract of L. lanceolata is safe and well-tolerated and devoid
of deleterious effects on the vital organs.
Treatment Group |
Dose (mg/kg) |
ALT (IU/L) |
AST (IU/L) |
ALP (IU/L) |
Group 1 |
- |
34.87 ± 1.24 |
81.13 ± 1.28 |
305.3 ± 23.19 |
Group 2 |
100 |
36.27 ± 0.97 |
80.86 ± 2.73 |
343.4 ± 5.88 |
Group 3 |
400 |
40.87 ± 1.68 |
84.27 ± 1.22 |
348.2 ± 6.37 |
Group 4 |
1000 |
37.19 ± 2.9 |
81.28 ± 2.71 |
319.3 ± 45.99 |
The results are expressed as mean ± standard error of mean (S.E.M), n=5. |
Table 1: Effect of the extract on ALT, AST and ALP.
Treatment Group |
Dose (mg/kg) |
TWBC Count (109 /L) |
Group 1 |
- |
19460 ± 2573 |
Group 2 |
100 |
17738 ± 1274 |
Group 3 |
400 |
20400 ± 2042 |
Group 4 |
1000 |
22025 ± 2236 |
The results are expressed as mean ± standard error of mean (S.E.M), n=5. |
Table 2: Effect of the extract on Total White Blood Cell Count.
Treatment Group |
Differential Leucocytes Counts (109 /L) |
|||||
|
Dose (mg/kg) |
Basophils |
Eosinophils |
Neutrophils |
Monocytes |
Lymphocytes |
Group 1 |
- |
0.4000 ± 0.2449 |
2.200 ± 0.3742 |
16.80 ±2.0100 |
1.400 ± 0.2449 |
79.20 ±1.9340 |
Group 2 |
100 |
0.2500 ± 0.2500 |
1.750 ± 0.2500 |
13.50 ±1.3230 |
1.250 ± 0.4187 |
83.25 ±1.3770 |
Group 3 |
400 |
0.4000 ± 0.2449 |
2.600 ± 0.5099 |
14.20 ±2.0830 |
1.600 ± 0.2449 |
81.20 ±2.0350 |
Group 4 |
1000 |
0.5000 ± 0.2887 |
2.000 ± 0.4082 |
21.50±3.4280 |
1.500 ± 0.2887 |
74.50 ±3.7530 |
The results are expressed as mean ± standard error of mean (S.E.M), n=5. |
Table 3: Effect of the extract on Differential Leucocytes Counts.
Extract |
Dose (mg.kg) |
RLW |
RKW |
RHW |
Group 1 |
- |
4.50 ± 0.41 |
0.49 ± 0.01 |
0.45 ± 0.03 |
Group 2 |
100 |
3.86 ± 0.12 |
0.45 ± 0.02 |
0.42 ± 0.02 |
Group 3 |
400 |
4.00 ± 0.40 |
0.45 ± 0.26 |
0.44 ± 0.04 |
Group 4 |
1000 |
4.13 ± 0.33 |
0.47 ± 0.28 |
0.48 ± 0.05 |
The results are expressed as mean ± standard error of mean (S.E.M) RLW= Relative liver weight; RKW= Relative kidney weight; RHW= Relative heart weight |
Table 4: Effect of the extract on gross morphology.