Research Article

The Beneficial Effect of Lactiplantibacillus Plantarum DM083 on Restoring the Hyperglycemia in High-Sucrose Diet-Fed Drosophila

by Jeong-Hoo Lee1, Yeon-Jin Kim1, Jiyoung Hwang1, Young-Youn Kim2, Hye-Sung Kim2,3, Do-Young Park1*

1DOCSMEDI OralBiome Co. Ltd., Goyang-si, Republic of Korea

2Apple Tree Dental Hospital, Apple Tree Medical Foundation, Goyang-si, South Korea

3Apple Tree Institute of Biomedical Science, Apple Tree Medical Foundation, Goyang-si, Republic of Korea

*Corresponding author: Do-Young Park, DOCSMEDI OralBiome Co., Ltd., Goyang-si, 10387, South Korea

Received Date: 06 February 2024

Accepted Date: 13 February 2024

Published Date: 16 February 2024

Citation: Lee JH, Kim YJ, Hwang J, Kim YY, Kim HS, et al. (2024) The Beneficial Effect of Lactiplantibacillus Plantarum DM083 on Restoring the Hyperglycemia in High-Sucrose Diet-Fed Drosophila. J Diabetes Treat 9: 10127. https://doi.org/10.29011/2574-7568.010127

Abstract

Probiotics are gaining much attention due to their beneficial functions in restoring microbial dysregulation which is the newly emerging etiology of the metabolic diseases such as hyperglycemia. The anti-hyperglycemic effects of probiotics were mostly demonstrated using rodents or human subjects, instead of in vitro cell lines due to the susceptibility to probiotics-derived acid compounds, leading to the ineligibility of in vitro cell lines for the massive screening of varied probiotic libraries. To address this issue, the current study was aimed to take advantage of the Drosophila to conduct the massive screening for the anti-hyperglycemic effects of 168 probiotic libraries belonging to 14 different species derived from human oral cavity. Each of 168 strains were individually treated to High-Sucrose Diet (HSD)-fed Drosophila and the lowest hemolymph glucose levels were measured in HSD-fed Drosophila supplemented with Lactiplantibacillus plantarum DM043, DM049, and DM083 among 168 strains. The Lpb. plantarum DM083 could survive at an acidic environment greater than DM043 and DM049. Heat-killed Lpb. plantarum DM083 failed to inhibit hyperglycemia, reflecting the importance of being alive. Importantly, Lpb. plantarum DM083-mediated molecular pathways related to insulin and glucose metabolisms were conserved from Drosophila to mammals, implying that Drosophila-tested Lpb. plantarum DM083 could be extrapolated to the rodents or humans. In conclusion, HSDfed Drosophila was for the first time applied to evaluate the anti-hyperglycemic effects of 168 probiotic libraries, leading to the discovery of Lpb. plantarum DM083 as the best candidate which will be applicable to the rodents and humans.

Keywords: High-sucrose diet, Hyperglycemia, Drosophila, Massive screening, Probiotics, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum

Introduction

The dietary imbalance, especially High-Sucrose Diet (HSD) intake, induces chronic metabolic disorders such as hyperlipidemia and hyperglycemia [1]. Based on the hypothesis that the development of the hyperglycemia is associated with the dysregulation in intestinal microbial ecology, many scholars have tried to employ potential therapeutic probiotics to restore gut dysbiosis preclinically [2-14] or clinically [15-19], leading to the alleviation of the hyperglycemia. The probiotic strains reported to exert the anti-hyperglycemic effects belonged to various kinds of bacterial species such as Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, Lacticaseibacillus casei, Lacticaseibacillus paracasei, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus, Limosilactobacillus reuteri, and Limosilactobacillus fermentum. However, most of those works lacked the description of the initial screening test for searching the target strain from varied probiotic libraries.

Due to the time and cost limitations, the rodents or human subjects are not available for a massive screening of probiotic libraries. Although being time and cost-efficient, in vitro cell lines are inappropriate for the probiotics due to the susceptibility to the probiotics-derived acidic compounds. Several studies made an effort to address this issue as applying the heat-killed probiotics to the in vitro cell lines [3,20]. However, the subsequent rodent test used the live probiotics [21], which could distort the initial screening results.

The fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, can be alternatively used for the massive screening of probiotic libraries due to the acid resistance, short life cycle, and high fecundity [22]. Importantly, HSD feeding to Drosophila effectively induced hyperglycemia in larva [23,24] or in adult flies [25]. In addition, the molecular mechanisms underlying hyperglycemia were shared between fly and rodent [26]. The HSD-fed Drosophila showed the decrease in mRNA expression of Insulin-Like Peptide 2 (Ilp2), the Drosophila ortholog of the insulin, in Insulin-Producing Cells (IPCs) located in the brain. Similarly, the HSD-fed mice exhibited the reduction in insulin secretion from pancreatic islets [26]. The insulin deficiency induced the shortage of glucose uptake into the peripheral cells, which was accompanied by cellular fasting responses represented by the elevation of the mRNA expressions of gluconeogenic genes such as phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (Pepck) and glucose 6-phosphatase (G6Pase) [23-25,27]. In particular, Drosophila contains trehalose 6-phosphatase (Tps1) in addition to G6Pase for gluconeogenesis [28].

Human oral cavity is colonized with a variety of intrinsic probiotics. The aim of this study is to take advantage of HSDfed Drosophila to search out a new anti-hyperglycemic probiotic strain among 168 probiotic libraries derived from human Tongue Coating (TC) biospecimens donated from 120 healthy volunteers (100 adults and 20 younger children).

Materials and Methods

Isolation and identification of TC-originating probiotic strains

All procedures were conducted in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations approved by the ethics committee of the Institutional Review Board of the Apple Tree Dental Hospital (approval number: ATDH-2021-0001) and the Korea National

Institute for Bioethics Policy (approval number: P01-202111-31002). The TC samples, collected from 100 adults and 20 younger children, were distributed by the Biobank of Apple Tree Dental Hospital, a part of the Korea Biobank Network (KBN). The TC samples were resuspended in 3 mL of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and stored at -80 °C until used. To isolate TC-derived probiotic strains, 1 mL of each TC sample was plated onto ten plates (100 mL per plate) of LactoBacillus Selective (LBS) agar (Kisan Bio Inc., Korea) and anaerobically incubated for 48 h at 37 °C. The colonized isolates were identified by 16S rRNA partial sequencing (Macrogen Inc., Korea).

Fly culture and food

The Drosophila melanogaster white-eyed w1118 line was kept at a density of fifteen males and five females in each vial with 12 hour on/off light cycle at 25 °C. Three-day old flies fed ad libitum were used in all experiments. Flies were raised on food containing 2% (w/V) yeast and three different amounts of sucrose (w/V) (10%, 20%, and 40%), indicated with S10Y2, S20Y2, and S40Y2, respectively. The starvation diet contains only 1% sucrose.

Probiotics supplementation and hemolymph glucose measurements

Three-day old flies were transferred to vials containing the starvation diet and maintained for 12 h. Fasted flies were refed the experimental foods supplemented with probiotics at a concentration of 1010 Colony-Forming Units (CFU) per mL. After three days, males were anesthetized with posterior abdomen cropped, and vortexed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), allowing hemolymph to be eluted. After centrifuging at 9,000 g for 5 minutes at 4 °C, supernatants were used for determination of glucose levels by using the glucose detection kit (Sigma Aldrich Inc., USA). At least three biological replicates were measured on a microplate reader (SpectraMax iD3, Molecular Devices Inc., USA).

Acid-resistance test of probiotics

Resistance to low pH was evaluated as described by Ye et al. [28] with minor modifications. Briefly, probiotic strains were anaerobically cultured in de Man Rogosa Sharp (MRS, SigmaAldrich Inc., USA) liquid for 48 h at 37 °C. The cultures were inoculated into PBS adjusted to pH 2.5 or pH 6.5. After 6 h, the cultures were ten-fold diluted four times, thereafter each 100 μL of 1st ~ 4th dilutions were cultured on MRS agar. The x number of CFU was counted in y times diluted plate which presented the number of CFU between 30 and 200. The survival rate was calculated as the ratio of CFU of pH 2.5 to that of pH 6.5. The experiments were performed in triplicate and mean values were calculated.

Quantitative RT-PCR

Total mRNA was extracted using the RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen Inc., USA). The cDNA was generated with 0.5 μg total mRNA using the PrimeScriptTM RT-PCR kit (Takara Bio Inc., Japan) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The generated cDNA was used for real-time RT-PCR using Exicycler 96 Real-Time PCR systems (Bioneer Inc., Korea), SYBR Green PCR master mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA), and primers for Ilp2 (5-CT-

GAGTATGGTGTGCGAGGA-3 and 5-CAGCCAGGGAATTGAGTACAC-3), CCHa2 (5-TCGTTATCTGCACCGTGGTC-3 and 5-CCCTTTTTCGCTTGGCTCT-3), Pepck (5-AGAAGAAGTACATCACTGCCGCCT-3 and 5-TCCCTGCGAGTCAAACTTCATCCA-3), Tps1 (5-TCCGATGAGATCCTACAGGGTATG-3 and 5-CGCCATGTTCCACCAGCAGATTG-3), and Rp49 (5-CGGATCGATATGCTAAGCTGT-3 and 5-GCGCTTGTTCGATC-CGTA-3). The reaction conditions consist of the first denaturation step for 3 min at 95 °C followed by 40 cycles of a denaturation step for 10 s at 95 °C and an annealing/extension step for 20 s at 60 °C.

Antibiotic susceptibility test

Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) values for probiotics were determined in LSM medium (90% of Iso-Sensitest broth (KisanBio Inc., Korea) and 10% MRS broth) according to the ISO 10932:2010 broth microdilution procedure [30]. LSM medium was supplemented with serial dilutions of antibiotic compounds including GEN (0.5–256 mg/L), KAN (2–1,024 mg/L), STR (0.5–256 mg/L), TET (2–1,024 mg/L), ERY (0.016–8 mg/L), CLIN (0.032–16 mg/L), CHL (0.125–64 mg/L), and AMP (0.032–16 mg/L). Overnight-cultures of probiotics were inoculated into the LSM medium containing antibiotics and anaerobically incubated at 37 °C for 2 days. MIC was determined as the lowest concentration of antimicrobial compounds at which the growth of the probiotics was inhibited. The growth was measured at 600 nm absorbance using a SpectraMax iD3 microplate reader (Molecular Devices, USA) and MICs were compared to the cut-off values recommended by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) [31].

Hemolysis test

Hemolysis was observed by anaerobic incubation of the probiotics in Tryptic Soy Agar (TSA) (Fisher Scientific  Inc., USA) supplemented with 5% sheep blood (KisanBio Inc., Korea) at 37 °C for 2 days [32]. The loss of blood color around colonies indicates hemolysis.

Statistical analysis

All data were expressed as mean ± Standard Deviation (SD). Statistical analysis was performed through the analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the Tuckey’s multiple comparison.

Statistical significance was attributed to p values < 0.05 (*), 0.01 (**), and 0.001 (***). The software GraphPad Prism v5 (GraphPad Inc., USA) was used for the analysis.

Results

Isolation of probiotic strains from the human TC biospecimens

The human TC specimens distributed by the Korea Oral Biobank Network (KOBN) were originated from 100 adults (aged from 19 to 80) and 20 younger children (aged under 9). As the results of cultivating each TC specimen on LBS agar plates, a total of 168 colonies were isolated, which belonged to 9 different genera and 14 different species according to the reclassified nomenclature (Table 1) [33]. Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus (n = 52) showed the highest incidence, followed by Limosilactobacillus fermentum (n = 32), Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (n = 15), Lactobacillus gasseri (n = 14), Latilactobacillus curvatus (n = 14), Limosilactobacillus vaginalis (n = 13), Latilactobacillus sakei (n = 8), Lacticaseibacillus paracasei (n = 7), Ligilactobacillus salivarius (n = 6), Limosilactobacillus mucosae (n = 2), Lentilactobacillus sunkii (n = 2), Levilactobacillus brevis (n = 1), Levilactobacillus graminis (n = 1), and Liquorilactobacillus nagelii (n = 1). Among them, Lcb. rhamnosus, Llb. fermentum, Lpb. plantarum, Llb. sakei, and Lcb. paracasei are species found in both adults and younger children.

No.

Species name

Adults

Younger children

Sum

1

Latilactobacillus curvatus

 

14

14

2

Latilactobacillus graminis

 

1

1

3

Latilactobacillus sakei

1

7

8

4

Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus

49

3

52

5

Lacticaseibacillus paracasei

5

2

7

6

Lactiplantibacillus plantarum

12

3

15

7

Limosilactobacillus fermentum

23

9

32

8

Limosilactobacillus vaginalis

13

 

13

9

Limosilactobacillus mucosae

2

 

2

10

Lactobacillus gasseri

14

 

14

11

Ligilactobacillus salivarius

6

 

6

12

Lentilactobacillus sunkii

2

 

2

13

Levilactobacillus brevis

1

 

1

14

Liquorilactobacillus nagelii

1

 

1

 

Sum

129

39

168

Table 1: The list of probiotic strains isolated from adults and younger children.

Induction of hyperglycemia in Drosophila

To find out the sucrose concentration to induce hyperglycemia in Drosophila, adult flies were fed three kinds of diets differing in sucrose concentrations (10%, 20%, and 40%, respectively). As the results, the hemolymph glucose levels increased in proportion to the sucrose concentrations, leading to peak glucose level at 40% sucrose (Figure 1).

 

Figure 1: The graphs showing hemolymph glucose levels measured in Drosophila adult flies fed 2% yeast and three different concentrations of sucrose as indicated. Three times (five males per time) were replicated and subjected to ANOVA followed by the Tuckey’s multiple comparison. Statistical significance was attributed to p values < 0.01 (**) and 0.001 (***).

The massive screening of probiotic libraries using Drosophila

The massive screening was conducted to examine the anti-hyperglycemic effects of 168 libraries using Drosophila adult flies fed 40% sucrose and 2% yeast diet (triplicate of five males for each probiotic strain). As the results, three strains belonging to Lpb. plantarum species (DM043, DM049, and DM083) were determined to be the most effective in suppressing hyperglycemia as indicated with gray bars in Figure 2.

Figure 2: The graphs showing hemolymph glucose levels of Drosophila fed 40% sucrose and 2% yeast (S40Y2, black bars) and S40Y2fed Drosophila supplemented with 168 probiotic libraries from DM001 to DM177 with exemption of nine. Gray bars indicated the probiotic strains exerting the strongest effects on anti-hyperglycemia.

Acid-tolerance test

The acid-tolerance test determined that Lpb. plantarum DM083 was significantly more acid-tolerant than DM043 or DM049 (Figure 3A), implying that the Lpb. plantarum DM083 is more likely to remain alive after passing through the stomach compared to DM043 or DM049. The significance of being alive in relation to the anti-hyperglycemic effect of Lpb. plantarum DM083 was reflected by the result that the heat-killed Lpb. plantarum DM083 failed to restore hyperglycemia (Figure 3B).

    

Figure 3: (A) The graphs illustrating survival rates (%) of Lpb. plantarum DM043, DM049, and DM083 which were calculated as the ratio of the number of CFU incubated in pH2.5 to that incubated in pH6.5. (B) The graphs demonstrating hemolymph glucose levels of S40Y2-fed Drosophila supplemented with live or heat-killed Lpb. plantarum DM083. Three times were replicated and subjected to ANOVA followed by the Tuckey’s multiple comparison. Statistical significance was attributed to p values < 0.01 (**) and 0.001 (***).

The mechanisms underlying the anti-hyperglycemic effect of probiotics

To investigate the molecular mechanisms under which Lpb. plantarum DM083 can alleviate the hyperglycemia, mRNA levels of genes related to the insulin and glucose metabolisms were measured in Drosophila adult flies feeding 10% sucrose (normal diet, ND), 40% sucrose (high-sucrose diet, HSD), and HSD + 1010 CFU/mL Lpb. plantarum DM083 (HSD+DM083). The mRNA levels of CCHamide-2 (CCHa2), the insulin secretagogue, measured in the intestine tissues were lowered in HSD compared to ND, but significantly upregulated in HSD+DM083 (Figure 4A). The mRNA levels of Ilp2, the Drosophila ortholog of insulin, measured in the brain tissues were also reduced in HSD compared to ND, but significantly increased in HSD+DM083 (Figure 4B). The mRNA levels of both Pepck and Trehalose6-phosphatase (Tps1), the gluconeogenic genes, measured in abdomen tissues were higher in HSD compared to ND, but significantly downregulated in HSD+DM083 (Figure 4C and D). Taken together, Lpb. plantarum DM083 intervention successfully restored HSD-induced dysregulations in insulin and glucose metabolisms.

Figure 4: The graphs showing mRNA levels of CCHa2 (A), Ilp2 (B), Pepck (C), and Tps1 (D) in Drosophila fed ND, HSD, and HSD+DM083. Three times were replicated and subjected to ANOVA followed by the Tuckey’s multiple comparison. Statistical significance was attributed to p values < 0.05 (*) and 0.001 (***).

Safety evaluations of Lpb. plantarum DM083

The antibiotic susceptibility of the Lpb. plantarum DM083 was evaluated by MIC values according to EFSA criteria for Lpb.

plantarum, resulting that Lpb. plantarum DM083 was susceptible to all the tested antibiotics as indicated in Table 2. Additionally, no hemolytic activity of the Lpb. plantarum DM083 was observed when cultured on TSA supplemented with sheep blood for 2 days at 37 °C (data not shown).

Class

Aminoglycoside

Tetracycline

Macrolide

Lincomycin

Amphenicol

β-Lactam

Antibiotic (mg/L)

GEN

KAN

TET

ERY

CLIN

CHL

AMP

Cut-off value*

16

64

32

1

2

8

1

DM083

2

16

32

0.5

0.5

8

0.5

*Based on EFSA criteria for Lpb. plantarum.

Table 2: Antibiotics susceptibility test of Lpb. plantarum DM083.

Discussion

Lpb. plantarum is a non-gas-producing lactic acid bacterium that is generally regarded as safe (GRAS) [34]. The representative strain for the Lpb. plantarum is WCFS1 isolated from saliva [35], and most of other strains belonging to the Lpb. plantarum were isolated in fermented foods [34] and infant faces [36]. Interestingly, plenty of research reports exhibited the anti-hyperglycemic effects exerted by various kinds of the Lpb. plantarum strains such as CCFM0236 [2], Ln4 [3], MTCC5690 [4], NCDC17 [10], 299v [37], 13 [38], TN627 [39], DSM15313 [40], OLL2712 [41], NCIMB8826 [42], MG4296 [43], SCS2 [44], SS18-5 [45], LRCC5310 [46], Y15 [47], Dad-13 [48], SHY130 [49], and NC8 [50]. Especially, Lpb. plantarum HAC01 was intensively investigated to show the anti-hyperglycemic effects in the high-fat diet (HFD)/streptozotocin (STZ)-treated mice [12] and humans [18]. Those numerous references implies that Lpb. plantarum-belonged strains share the crucial factors being advantageous over other probiotic species in modulating the host glucose and insulin metabolisms although the concrete evidence has remained obscure. Importantly, the application of Drosophila adult flies to probiotic libraries including 14 species and 168 strains also demonstrated that the anti-hyperglycemic effects of Lpb. plantarum-belonged strains (DM043, DM049, and DM083) are superior to other probiotics, contributing to the reinforcement of those references above.

The mechanisms underlying the probiotic effects can be attributed to the interaction between probiotics-derived metabolic compounds and gastrointestinal tract. Several Lpb. plantarum-derived compounds such as phenyllactic acid [51], butyrate [52], gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) [53], and exopolysaccharide [54] have been already specified to cause the anti-hyperglycemic effects. Those microbial products can interact with the gastrointestinal tract of which enteroendocrine cells play the pivotal roles to secrete various types of peptide hormones. For instance, the microbial GABA was reported to increase GlucagonLike Protein-1 (GLP-1) secretion in enteroendocrine cells [55]. GLP-1 is released from L-cells in mammalian small intestine and relayed to the pancreatic b-cells, contributing to enhance the insulin secretion and thus rescue diabetic hyperglycemia and hyperlipidemia [56].

It is plausible that the anti-hyperglycemic effect of the Lpb. plantarum DM083 also might be derived from its bioactive molecules. The Lpb. plantarum DM083 genome (GenBank CP099962.1) possesses the glutamate decarboxylase (NHN79_14330) [57] which catalyzes GABA production, implying that the Lpb. plantarum DM083 could contribute to the stimulation of GLP-1 release from enteroendocrine cells and thereafter insulin secretion from pancreas [58]. The current study demonstrated that Lpb. plantarum DM083 increased the intestinal mRNA levels of CCHa2 and the brain mRNA levels of Ilp2. On the behalf of GLP-1, in Drosophila, enteroendocrine cell-specific hormone CCHa2 is relayed to the IPCs located in the brain, contributing to the elevation of the mRNA level of the Ilp2, the Drosophila ortholog of the insulin [59,60]. It should be needed to examine if the Lpb. plantarum DM083 can produce GABA in the further study.

Conclusions

The significance of the current finding is that the massive screening of probiotic libraries can be highly available using the acid-resistant, time- and cost-efficient model of Drosophila of which molecular mechanisms underlying glucose and insulin metabolisms are conserved from flies to mammals. It is noteworthy to propose that the anti-hyperglycemic effect of the Lpb. plantarum DM083 demonstrated by HSD-fed Drosophila would be also remarkable in the diabetic rodents or humans.

Author contributions

D.-Y.P. developed the project, designed experiments, evaluated the data, and drafted the manuscript. J.-H.L. and Y.-J.K. conducted Drosophila experiments. J.H. conducted biospecimen collection and microbial experiments. Y.-Y.K. and H.-S.K. provided clinical resources and critical comments. D.-Y.P. supervised the project and edited the final version of the manuscript. All authors discussed drafts and approved the final manuscript for publication.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by DOCSMEDI OralBiome Co., Ltd., the Apple Tree Medical Foundation, and the Korea Biobank Network Program run by the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency (KBN4-A04-03).

Ethical Guidelines

The collection and distribution of biospecimens by the Biobank of Apple Tree Dental Hospital was approved by the ethics committee of the Apple Tree Medical Foundation (IRB number: ATDH-2021-0001). All participants understood the purpose of the study and provided informed consent. The study using the distributed TC biospecimens (IRB approval number: P01-202111-31-002) was approved by the ethics committee of the Public Institutional Review Board (http://public.irb.or.kr) run by the Korea National Institute for Bioethics Policy.

Conflict of Interest

D.-Y.P., J.-H.L., Y.-J.K., and J.H. are employees of DOSCMEDI OralBiome. Y.-Y.K. and H.-S.K. are employees of the Apple Tree Medical Foundation and own DOSCMEDI OralBiome stock.

References

  1. Malik VS, Popkin BM, Bray GA, Després JP, Willett WC, et al. (2010) Sugar-sweetened beverages and risk of metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis. Diabetes Care33: 2477-2483.
  2. Li X, Wang N, Yin B, Fang D, Jiang T, et al. (2016) Effects of Lactobacillus plantarum CCFM0236 on hyperglycaemia and insulin resistance in high-fat and streptozotocin-induced type 2 diabetic mice. J Appl Microbiol 121: 1727-1236.
  3. Lee E, Jung SR, Lee SY, Lee NK, Paik HD, et al. (2018) Lactobacillus plantarum Strain Ln4 Attenuates Diet-Induced Obesity, Insulin Resistance, and Changes in Hepatic mRNA Levels Associated with Glucose and Lipid Metabolism. Nutrient10: 643.
  4. Balakumar M, Prabhu D, Sathishkumar C, Prabu P, Rokana N, et al. (2018) Improvement in glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity by probiotic strains of Indian gut origin in high-fat diet-fed C57BL/6J mice. Eur J Nutr57: 279-295.
  5. Dang F, Jiang Y, Pan R, Zhou Y, Wu S, et al. (2018) Administration of Lactobacillus paracasei ameliorates type 2 diabetes in mice. Food Funct9: 3630-3639.
  6. Memarrast F, Ghafouri-Fard S, Kolivand S, Nodooshan SJ, Neyazi N, et al. (2017) Comparative evaluation of probiotics effects on plasma glucose, lipid, and insulin levels in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Diabetes Metab Res Rev33.
  7. Manaer T, Yu L, Nabi XH, Dilidaxi D, Liu L, et al. (2021) The beneficial effects of the composite probiotics from camel milk on glucose and lipid metabolism, liver and renal function and gut microbiota in db/db mice. BMC Complement Med Ther21: 127.
  8. Sakai T, Taki T, Nakamoto A, Shuto E, Tsutsumi R, et al. (2013) Lactobacillus plantarum OLL2712 regulates glucose metabolism in C57BL/6 mice fed a high-fat diet. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo) 59: 144147.
  9. Wang G, Li X, Zhao J, Zhang H, Chen W (2017) Lactobacillus casei CCFM419 attenuates type 2 diabetes via a gut microbiota dependent mechanism. Food Funct 8: 3155-3164.
  10. Singh S, Sharma RK, Malhotra S, Pothuraju R, Shandilya UK (2017) Lactobacillus rhamnosus NCDC17 ameliorates type-2 diabetes by improving gut function, oxidative stress and inflammation in high-fatdiet fed and streptozotocintreated rats. Benef Microbes8: 243-255.
  11. Zeng Z, Yuan Q, Yu R, Zhang J, Ma H, et al. (2019) Ameliorative Effects of Probiotic Lactobacillus paracasei NL41 on Insulin Sensitivity, Oxidative Stress, and Beta-Cell Function in a Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Rat Model. Mol Nutr Food Res 63: e1900457.
  12. Lee YS, Lee D, Park GS, Ko SH, Park J, et al. (2021) Lactobacillus plantarum HAC01 ameliorates type 2 diabetes in high-fat diet and streptozotocin-induced diabetic mice in association with modulating the gut microbiota. Food Funct12: 6363-6373.
  13. Hallajzadeh J, Eslami RD, Tanomand A (2021) Effect of Lactobacillus delbrueckii Subsp. lactis PTCC1057 on Serum Glucose, Fetuin-A ,and Sestrin 3 Levels in Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetic Mice. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins13: 383-389.
  14. Pegah A, Abbasi-Oshaghi E, Khodadadi I, Mirzaei F, Tayebinai H (2021) Probiotic and resveratrol normalize GLP-1 levels and oxidative stress in the intestine of diabetic rats. Metabol Open10: 100093.
  15. Mobini R, Tremaroli V, Ståhlman M, Karlsson F, Levin M, et al. (2017) Metabolic effects of Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 in people with type 2 diabetes: A randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Obes Metab 19: 579-589.
  16. Kobyliak N, Falalyeyeva T, Mykhalchyshyn G, Kyriienko D, Komissarenko I (2018) Effect of alive probiotic on insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes patients: Randomized clinical trial. Diabetes Metab Syndr12: 617-624.
  17. Kassaian N, Feizi A, Aminorroaya A, Jafari P, Ebrahimi MT, et al. (2018) The effects of probiotics and synbiotic supplementation on glucose and insulin metabolism in adults with prediabetes: a doubleblind randomized clinical trial. Acta Diabetol 55: 1019-1028.
  18. Oh MR, Jang HY, Lee SY, Jung SJ, Chae SW, et al. (2021) Lactobacillus plantarum HAC01 Supplementation Improves Glycemic Control in Prediabetic Subjects: A Randomized, Double-Blind, PlaceboControlled Trial. Nutrients 13: 2337.
  19. Toshimitsu T, Gotou A, Sashihara T, Hachimura S, Shioya N, et al. (2020) Effects of 12-Week Ingestion of Yogurt Containing Lactobacillus plantarum OLL2712 on Glucose Metabolism and Chronic Inflammation in Prediabetic Adults: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial. Nutrients12: 374.
  20. Park DY, Ahn YT, Huh CS, Jeon SM, Choi MS (2011) The inhibitory effect of Lactobacillus plantarum KY1032 cell extract on the adipogenesis of 3T3-L1 Cells. J Med Food 14: 670-675.
  21. Park DY, Ahn YT, Park SH, Huh CS, Yoo SR, et al. (2013) Supplementation of Lactobacillus curvatus HY7601 and Lactobacillus plantarum KY1032 in diet-induced obese mice is associated with gut microbial changes and reduction in obesity. PLoS One 8: e59470.
  22. Brogiolo W, Stocker H, Ikeya T, Rintelen F, Fernandez R, et al. (2001) An evolutionarily conserved function of the Drosophila insulin receptor and insulin-like peptides in growth control. Curr Biol 11: 213-221.
  23. Musselman LP, Fink JL, Narzinski K, Ramachandran PV, Hathiramani SS, et al. (2011) A high-sugar diet produces obesity and insulin resistance in wild-type Drosophila. Dis Model Mech 4: 842-849.
  24. Pasco MY, Léopold P (2012) High sugar-induced insulin resistance in Drosophila relies on the lipocalin Neural Lazarillo. PLoS One 7: e36583.
  25. Morris SN, Coogan C, Chamseddin K, Fernandez-Kim SO, Kolli S, et al. (2012) Development of diet-induced insulin resistance in adult Drosophila melanogaster. Biochim Biophys Acta 1822: 1230-1237.
  26. Sumiyoshi M, Sakanaka M, Kimura Y (2006) Chronic intake of highfat and high-sucrose diets differentially affects glucose intolerance in mice. J Nutr 136: 582-587.
  27. Crivat G, Lizunov VA, Li CR, Stenkula KG, Zimmerberg J, et al. (2013) Insulin stimulates translocation of human GLUT4 to the membrane in fat bodies of transgenic Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS One. 8: e77953.
  28. Miyamoto T, Amrein H (2017) Gluconeogenesis: An ancient biochemical pathway with a new twist. Fly (Austin)11: 218-223.
  29. Ye L, Zhao H, Li Z, Wu JC (2013) Improved acid tolerance of Lactobacillus pentosus by error-prone whole genome amplification. Bioresour Technol 135: 459-463.
  30. (2010) ISO. Milk and Milk Products-Determination of the Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) of Antibiotics Applicable to Bifidobacteria and Non-Enterococcal Lactic Acid Bacteria (LAB). ISO 10932:2010 (IDF 223:2010).
  31. Rychen G, Aquilina G, Azimonti G, Bampidis V, Bastos ML, et al. (2018) Guidance on the characterisation of microorganisms used as feed additives or as production organisms. EFSA Journal 16: e05206.
  32. Kim MJ, Ku S, Kim SY, Lee HH, Jin H, et al. (2018) Safety Evaluations of Bifidobacterium bifidum BGN4 and Bifidobacterium longum BORI. International Journal of Molecular Science19: 1422.
  33. Zheng J, Wittouck S, Salvetti E, Franz CMAP, Harris HMB, et al. (2020) A taxonomic note on the genus Lactobacillus: Description of 23 novel genera, emended description of the genus Lactobacillus Beijerinck 1901, and union of Lactobacillaceae and Leuconostocaceae. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 70: 2782-2858.
  34. Liu YW, Liong MT, Tsai YC (2018) New perspectives of Lactobacillus plantarum as a probiotic: The gut-heart-brain axis. J Microbiol 56: 601613.
  35. Kleerebezem M, Boekhorst J, van Kranenburg R, Molenaar D, Kuipers OP, et al. (2003) Complete genome sequence of Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100: 1990-1995.
  36. Panwar H, Calderwood D, Grant IR, Grover S, Green BD (2014) Lactobacillus strains isolated from infant faeces possess potent inhibitory activity against intestinal alpha- and beta-glucosidases suggesting anti-diabetic potential. Eur J Nutr53: 1465-1474.
  37. Sargin P, Roethle MF, Jia S, Pant T, Ciecko AE, et al. (2022) Lactiplantibacillus plantarum 299v supplementation modulates betacell ER stress and antioxidative defense pathways and prevents type 1 diabetes in gluten-free BioBreeding rats. Gut Microbes14: 2136467.
  38. Yakovlieva M, Tacheva T, Mihaylova S, Tropcheva R, Trifonova K, et al. (2015) Influence of Lactobacillus brevis 15 and Lactobacillus plantarum 13 on blood glucose and body weight in rats after highfructose diet. Benef Microbes6: 505-512.
  39. Bejar W, Hamden K, Ben Salah R, Chouayekh H (2013) Lactobacillus plantarum TN627 significantly reduces complications of alloxaninduced diabetes in rats. Anaerobe 24: 4-11.
  40. Andersson U, Branning C, Ahrne S, Molin G, Alenfall J, et al. (2010) Probiotics lower plasma glucose in the high-fat fed C57BL/6J mouse. Benef Microbes 1: 189-196.
  41. Toshimitsu T, Ozaki S, Mochizuki J, Furuichi K, Asami Y (2017) Effects of Lactobacillus plantarum Strain OLL2712 Culture Conditions on the Anti-inflammatory Activities for Murine Immune Cells and Obese and Type 2 Diabetic Mice. Appl Environ Microbiol 83: e03001-16.
  42. Martinic A, Barouei J, Bendiks Z, Mishchuk D, Heeney DD, et al. (2018) Supplementation of Lactobacillus plantarum Improves Markers of Metabolic Dysfunction Induced by a High Fat Diet. J Proteome Res 17: 2790-2802.
  43. Won G, Choi SI, Kang CH, and Kim GH (2021) Lactiplantibacillus plantarum MG4296 and Lacticaseibacillus paracasei MG5012 Ameliorates Insulin Resistance in Palmitic Acid-Induced HepG2 Cells and High Fat Diet-Induced Mice. Microorganisms 9: 1139.
  44. Wu LJ, Long L, Sun JY, Bu LL, Cao JL, Luo Y, et al. (2021) Exploring the antioxidant effect of Lactobacillus plantarum SCS2 on mice with type 2 diabetes. J Food Biochem 18: e13781.
  45. Yang F, Wang J, Zhang H, Xie Y, Jin J, Liu H, et al. (2021) Hypoglycemic effects of space-induced Lactobacillus plantarum SS18-5 on type 2 diabetes in a rat model. J Food Biochem 45: e13899.
  46. Youn HS, Kim JH, Lee JS, Yoon YY, Choi SJ, Lee JY, et al. (2021) Lactobacillus plantarum Reduces Low-Grade Inflammation and Glucose Levels in a Mouse Model of Chronic Stress and Diabetes. Infect Immun 89: e0061520.
  47. Liu Y, Zheng S, Cui J, Guo T, Zhang J (2022) Lactiplantibacillus plantarum Y15 alleviate type 2 diabetes in mice via modulating gut microbiota and regulating NF-kappaB and insulin signaling pathway. Braz J Microbiol 53: 935-45.
  48. Rustanti N, Murdiati A, Juffrie M, and Rahayu ES (2022) Effect of Probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum Dad-13 on Metabolic Profiles and Gut Microbiota in Type 2 Diabetic Women: A Randomized DoubleBlind Controlled Trial. Microorganisms 10: 1806.
  49. Wang G, Song J, Huang Y, Li X, Wang H, Zhang Y, et al. (2022) Lactobacillus plantarum SHY130 isolated from yak yogurt attenuates hyperglycemia in C57BL/6J mice by regulating the enteroinsular axis. Food Funct 13: 675-87.
  50. Zhang Y, Li Y, Wang X, Huang J, Feng X, Shi C, et al. (2023) Lactobacillus Plantarum NC8 and its metabolite acetate alleviate type 1 diabetes via inhibiting NLRP3. Microb Pathog 182: 106237.
  51. Ilavenil S, Kim DH, Valan Arasu M, Srigopalram S, Sivanesan R, et al. (2015) Phenyllactic Acid from Lactobacillus plantarum PromotesAdipogenic Activity in 3T3-L1 Adipocyte via Up-Regulationof PPAR-gamma2. Molecules 20: 15359-73.
  52. Sun X, Xi Y, Yan M, Sun C, Tang J, Dong X, et al. (2023) Lactiplantibacillus plantarum NKK20 Increases Intestinal Butyrate Production and Inhibits Type 2 Diabetic Kidney Injury through PI3K/ Akt Pathway. J Diabetes Res 2023: 8810106.
  53. Kim J, Lee MH, Kim MS, Kim GH, Yoon SS (2022) Probiotic Properties and Optimization of Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid Production by Lactiplantibacillus plantarum FBT215. J Microbiol Biotechnol 32: 78391.
  54. Huang Z, Lin F, Zhu X, Zhang C, Jiang M, et al. (2020) An exopolysaccharide from Lactobacillus plantarum H31 in pickled cabbage inhibits pancreas alpha-amylase and regulating metabolic markers in HepG2 cells by AMPK/PI3K/Akt pathway. Int J Biol Macromol 143: 775-84.
  55. Noguchi H, Kohda N, Hara H, Hira T (2023) Synergistic enhancement of glucagon-like peptide-1 release by γ-aminobutyric acid and L-phenylalanine in enteroendocrine cells-searching active ingredients in a water extract of corn zein protein. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 87: 1505-13.
  56. Dallinga-Thie GM, Nieuwdorp M (2015) GLP1, an Important Regulator of Intestinal Lipid Metabolism. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 35: 10489.
  57. Park DY, Hwang J, Kim Y, Kim YY, Kim HS, et al. (2022) Complete Genome Sequence of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum Strain DM083 Isolated from Human Tongue Coating. Microbiol Resour Announc 11: e0067522.
  58. Guo X, Lv J, Xi R (2022) The specification and function of enteroendocrine cells in Drosophila and mammals: a comparative review. Febs j 289: 4773-96.
  59. Sano H, Nakamura A, Texada MJ, Truman JW, Ishimoto H, et al. (2015) The Nutrient-Responsive Hormone CCHamide-2 Controls Growth by Regulating Insulin-like Peptides in the Brain of Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS Genet 11: e1005209.
  60. Li S, Torre-Muruzabal T, Søgaard KC, Ren GR, Hauser F, et al. (2013) Expression patterns of the Drosophila neuropeptide CCHamide-2 and its receptor may suggest hormonal signaling from the gut to the brain. PLoS One 8: e76131.

© by the Authors & Gavin Publishers. This is an Open Access Journal Article Published Under Attribution-Share Alike CC BY-SA: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International License. With this license, readers can share, distribute, download, even commercially, as long as the original source is properly cited. Read More.

Journal of Diabetes and Treatment

cara menggunakan pola slot mahjongrtp tertinggi hari inislot mahjong ways 1pola gacor olympus hari inipola gacor starlight princessslot mahjong ways 2strategi olympustrik mahjong ways 2trik olympus hari inirtp koi gatertp pragmatic tertinggicheat jackpot mahjongpg soft link gamertp jackpotelemen sakti mahjongpola maxwin mahjongslot olympus mudah mainrtp live starlightrumus slot mahjongmahjong scatter hitamslot pragmaticjam gacor mahjongpola gacor mahjongstrategi maxwin olympusslot jamin menangrtp slot gacorscatter wild banditopola slot mahjongstrategi maxwin sweet bonanzartp slot terakuratkejutan scatter hitamslot88 resmimaxwin olympuspola mahjong pgsoftretas mahjong waystrik mahjongtrik slot olympusewallet modal recehpanduan pemula slotpg soft primadona slottercheat mahjong androidtips dewa slot mahjongslot demo mahjonghujan scatter olympusrtp caishen winsrtp sweet bonanzamahjong vs qilinmaxwin x5000 starlight princessmahjong wins x1000rtp baru wild scatterpg soft trik maxwinamantotorm1131