Article / Research Article

"Prevalence of Intestinal Parasites Among Children 13-And-Under Residents in the Indigenous Land of Xakriabá, Brazil"

Gabriela Lanna de Carvalho Siqueira1,Ioannis Bakolis2, Maria Terezinha Bahia3, Carolina Coimbra Marinho4, Edivá de Paula Vieira5, João Luiz Pena6, Laura Cunha Rodrigues7, George Luiz Lins Machado-Coelho8*

1Department of Nucleus of Research in Biological Sciences, Federal University of Ouro Preto, Brazil

2Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Imperial College London, UK

3Department of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Ouro Preto, Brazil

4Department of Infectology, Federal University of Ouro Preto, Brazil

5Ministry of Health, Indigenous Special Health, Brazil

6Department of Sanitation Engineering,Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brazil

7Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology,London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK

8Department of Medical Sciences, Federal University of Ouro Preto, Brazil

*Corresponding author:George Luiz Lins Machado-Coelho, Department of Medical Sciences, Federal University of Ouro Preto, Brazil. Tel: +553135591003; Email: gmcoelho@medicina.ufop.br

Received Date:30 November, 2017; Accepted Date:12 December, 2017; Published Date:18 December, 2017.

1.      Abstract

1.1    Introduction: This study reports the prevalence of intestinal parasite infectionsinXakriabáindigenous childrenliving in the southeasternregion ofBrazil.

1.2    Methodology: Stool samples of 2973 children 13-and-under were analyzed. Associations between environment factors and parasites were evaluated by multivariate Poisson regression model.

1.3    Results: The prevalence of protozoa was high (Entamoeba histolytica/dispar16.9%; Giardia duodenalis18.4%), whereas that of helminthes was low (Schistosoma mansoni1.2%; Hymenolepis nana2.2%; hookworm3.7%; Strongiloydesstercoralis0.4%; Ascaris lumbricoides0.4%; Enterobiusvermicularis1%). The risk of protozoan infection increased if the house was located in clay and rocky terrain; it decreased with increasing educationof the mother and the presence of toilet in the house. Sex, clay-and-rockyterrain, dry-sump and toilet in the house were associated with prevalence of helminthes. Conclusion: The high prevalence of protozoa infection suggests contamination of water sources with feces, probably due to deficient sanitation and poor hygiene.

2.      Keywords:Indigenous population; Parasite diseases; Prevalence

1.      Introduction 

Indigenous population count in Brazil increased from 294131 in 1991 to 817963 people in 2010 due to the criteria of self-declaration of ethnicity adopted by the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics- IBGEfor the demographic census[1].of the 48720 self-declared indigenousin Minas Gerais state in 2000, 8880 live in one of the seven Demarcated Indigenous Lands (DIL). The Xakriabá comprise 85% of total indigenous population in the state. Theylive in the semiarid region by the riverSão Francisco, in the municipality of São João das Missões, north of the state[2].Demographic distribution in theDIL is determined by naturalwater availability, which can be scarce and often subject to exhaustion of the reservoirs [3],forcing the use of rainwater usually stored for very long periods. 

The recent history of the indigenous populations in Brazil has been marked by rapid socioeconomic and environmental changes, with consequences topublic health. When compared to the general population, health indicators of indigenous populations tend to be worse, despite improvements observed in the 10 years following the foundation of the health subsystem dedicated to indigenous populations [4]. Childhood health indicators reveal high prevalence of height-for-age deficit, anemia, high frequency of hospitalization during the first year and diarrhea during the first week of life[5]. 

It has been suggested that the epidemiology of intestinal parasites among indigenous populations depends on factors such as climate, socio-economical, educational and sanitation[6]. Those characteristics determine a range of health conditions, including chronic diarrhea andmalnutrition,especially in younger ages[5]. A major obstacle for the development of appropriate health policies and responsive healthcare delivery is the lack of population specific data. Despite the size of the indigenous population in Minas Gerais and its importance in the national nosology scenario [1,3], little is known about the epidemiology of intestinal parasites in this population. The resultsreported here might help toreduceparasitic infections inchildren living in the studied area. The main objective of this study is to determine the prevalence of intestinal parasites and the risk factors related to protozoan and helminth infection in children 13-and-under living in the Demarcated Indigenous Land ofXakriabá (DILX). 

2.      Materials and Methods 

2.1    Sample and Study Design 

A general overview of the Indigenous Population ofXakriabá (ILX) living conditions is presented. Sanitation, housing, watersources, education, income, economic activity and parasite infections are discussed.The study took place in the DILX in São João das Missões-MG, Brazil, in the micro-region of Peruaçu valley, part of the São Francisco river watershed(Figure 1). The study population was 6854 people, living in 1250 houses, distributed in 52 villages, served by five Basic Healthcare Units (BHU): Brejo Mata Fome, Sumaré, Itapicuru, Pindaíbas and Rancharia. 

A cross-sectional study was performed in 2009. All children 13-and-underwere invited to participate (N=2973). TF-Test kits were used for stool sampling. The adults responsible for the participating children receivedinstructions for triple sample collection, one sample a day on alternate days, using one new tube for each sample. TFT offers a reliable estimate of the prevalence of protozoan infection, and exhibits higher or comparable positivity rates compared to Kato-Katz (KK), Hoffman-Pons-Janer (HPJ), and Willis techniques for helminth detection[7]. 

2.2    Parasitological Technique 

All samples were processed following TFT kit manufacturer instructions. A TFT kit includes three collector tubes containing one small scoop and neutral buffered formalin (patient kit), and a conical flask with a double-filtering system composed of one 400μm and one 200μm meshes for parasite concentration by centrifugation (laboratory kit).The scoop is calibrated to collect approximately 1g of feces. The TFT kit was developed to process simultaneously three fecal samples collected on alternate days. Approximately 1g of feceswas collected and added to each of the three tubes. The tube was vigorously agitated for homogenization. Each tube received a drop of neutral detergent plus 3ml ethyl acetate andwas attached to thelid of the conical flask in order to transfer the content of the tubes by inversion. The flask was centrifuged for 1min at 1500rpm. The supernatants were discarded and the sediments were homogenized with normal saline solution. For each sample, one drop of the homogenized material was transferred to a microscope slide containing one drop of Lugol’s solution. Slides were subsequently examined in an optical microscope. 

2.3    Data 

Interviewers were trained to collect socio-demographic, housing and environment information, using a pre-tested and standardized form of questionnaire. Variables recorded were sex, weight, height, age, level of education of the mother, and residence. Housing characteristics such as agglomeration, electric power, type if roof (straw or canvas), type of wall (adobe or mud hand), type of floor, availability of kitchen, toilet, watersource, drinking water filtered or boiled were also recorded. The variables related to the environment around the villages and BHU were main type of terrain and forestation. Severe or moderate chronic and acute protein-energy malnutrition in children 9-and-under was defined by the height-to-age index and weight-to-age index, respectively, using the Z-score criteria, with a cut-off of-2[8], according to the Multicentre Growth Reference Study (MGRS) of the World Health Organization[9].Anthro Plus software was used to generate anthropometric indexes.

4.4 Statistical Analysis

Prevalence of intestinal parasites was estimated by different demographic and environmental factors. Chi-square tests explored associations between the prevalence of intestinal parasites (pathogenic protozoa and helminth) with sex, age and Basic Health Unit. A two-stage analysis statistical modelling was used to further explore the association of intestinal parasites with potential socio-demographic, housing and environmental risk factors. The first stage was used to filterout irrelevant variables. The model built in the second stage allowed a formal description of a functional relation between the variables screened for relevance in the first stage and the outcome. At the screening stage, associations of parasites with seventeen potential risk factors were examined with the use of univariate random intercept Poisson regression model with robust variance [10] set to account for the degree of clustering of individuals within twenty-five villages and four BHU [11]. Association of potential risk factors with parasite infection showing a p-value lower than 0.20 in the univariate analysis (screening stage) were selected for inclusion in a multivariate random intercept Poisson regression model with robust variance (model building stage) [12].All statistical analyses were performed with STATA 12 (Stata Corporation, College Station, Texas USA).

4.5 Ethics Approval 

The present work was approved by the local indigenous leadership, the local council of the Main Health Unit of São João das Missões, the Ethics on Research Board of the Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (Statement nº 2005/58), the National Ethics on Research Board (Statement nº 902/2006, Register 12827), and the National Indigene Foundation (Statement nº 323/CGEP/06). Written informed consent was collected from the adult responsible for each child. 

3.      Results 

Distribution according to age was as follows: 216 (7.1%) under 1; 1168 (38.5%) 1to 5 y-o; 999 (33.0%) 6 to 9 y-o and 647 (21.3%) 10-12 y-o. There were 1546 (51%) boys and 1484 (49%) girls. 

Stools samples were provided by 2106 childrenand 1066 (50.6%) were positive. Geographical distribution of parasite positivity is shown in(Figure 2). Itapicuruhad the highest prevalence (57.1%), andPindaíbas, the lowest (44.5%) (Table 1). Prevalence of infection by pathogenic protozoa (Entamoeba histolytica/disparand Giardia duodenalis) (32.5%) was significantly higher compared to helminthes (7.7%). Prevalence of multiple parasite infection was very low, 0.5% for helminthes and 3.0% for co-infection with E.histolytica/E. disparand G. duodenalis. Brejo Mata Fomehad the highest prevalence of multiple infection for pathogenic protozoa (4.4%); however, infection with one single protozoa was more frequent in Itapicuru (34.2%). 

The highest prevalence (p<0.001) by age was in the 6-9 y-o group(Table 2). The prevalence of both pathogenic protozoa and helminthes increased with age, except for G. duodenalisthat predominated in the 1-5 y-o group. Entamoeba coli, a nonpathogenic protozoon, was the most prevalent with 30% overall positivity.

There was evidence that parasite infection increased with age (data not show). A statistically significant negative association of intestinal parasites with the number of years that mothers attended school was also observed. Positivity for helminthes was twice as frequent in malnourished children defined by weight-for-age index compared to eutrophic children. Pathogenic protozoa were more frequent in more populated houses. Children and adolescents living in villages with a sandy terrain had higher positivity for helminthescompared to those living in villages with clay or rocky terrain. Protozoa infection occurred more frequently in houses with straw or canvas roof, dirty floor, dry sump or outdoor toilet. No association was detected between helminthes infection and the housing variables (all p-values>0.05) or between sex and intestinal parasites (data not show).

Multivariate analysis found negative association of protozoan infection with the number of years the mother had attended school. It found positive association with living in villages with clay and rocky terrain, and with the presence of sanitary toilet in the house. Prevalence of helminthes was approximately 52% higher in boys compared to girls (p=0.016), 0.41 times lower in villages with clayterrain (p=0.002) and was associated with houses without sanitary toilet or dry sump. Similar results were observed when Health Polo Base was considered as level 2 unit in the analysis (Table 3).

4.      Discussion 

The Xakriabá indigenous children have high prevalence of intestinal protozoa infection and low prevalence of helminthes. Dirty floor, dry sump and houses supplied with untreated natural surface water were significantly associated with higher prevalence of protozoan. Clay and rocky terrain and male sex were associated with high prevalence of helminthes. 

Factors related to the environment and housing conditions, the individual, the parasites, and local health policies could explain the high prevalence of protozoa. Poor hygienic habits of children, living in houses with dirty floor and dry sump that allow the proliferation of germs[13]; the long survival of cysts in the environment [14]; the use of pluvial water stored for long periods for home supply; and the non-adherence to clinical protocols for anti-protozoa treatment due to the high toxicity related to the drugs commonly available in the health services could be listed. The high prevalence of protozoa is associated with the fecal-oral mode of transmission. The host eliminates infective cystic forms in the feces, allowing interpersonal contamination even in good environmental sanitary conditions [15].

Infection with E. histolytica/E. disparis distributed worldwide, closely related to poor sanitation and unsafe water supply. The agent usually lives inthe human intestine, where it causes dysentery, colitis and enterocolitis. Haematogenous dissemination may occur and affect organs such as the liver and brain, causing inflammation and abscesses[16]. 

Infection by G. duodenalismust not be neglected. It maycause diarrhea, malabsorption of nutrients, vitamins, folate, iron and zinc, and hinder children development [16]. Cysts of G.duodenalisremain viable in wet environment for three months, and are resistant to treatment with chloride [14]. Giardiasis is common in children under 10, both in developed and developing countries. The prevalence in Xakriabáchildren was 18.9%. The high infectivity rates can be worrisome, since one single infected subject can disseminate the parasite in the domestic environment, allowing the agent to spread outside the domicile [14]. 

The prevalence of E. coliwas high in the DILX and can be explained by interpersonal contamination with infecting cysts. It has been considered a human intestinal commensal like Endolimax nanaand Iodamoebabutschlii, butit is currently accepted as a parasite of variable pathogenicity. Depending on the intensity of infection, it can be associated with diarrhea in children[15].Nonetheless, despite the low pathogenicity the three agents are considered indicators of poor sanitary conditions, alerting the risk of fecal-oral transmission of diseases [16]. 

Contrary to general expectation, the Xakriabá children had low prevalence of helminthiasis. One possible explanation could be the routine administration of wide spectrum anti-helminthic drugs that, in opposition to anti-protozoa drugs, have very low toxicity [17].The unfavorable environment for the maintenance of eggs could add to the explanation [14].DILX is located in the semi-arid region of the São Francisco river with average precipitation as low as 75.25mm per year registered in a center near the Xakriabá land. In a similar ecosystem in the northeast region of Brazil, Alves et al. [18] observed that the dissemination of helminthic infections is correlated with soil humidity and the long duration of the dry season limits the proliferation of parasites. On the other hand, geohelminthes show characteristics that potentially increase the chances of reinfection, such as high fertility, resistance of the embryonated eggs under adverse conditions and wide capacity of dispersion, both out and indoors [17]. 

Regarding Schistosomamansoniinfection, all positive samples proceeded from the Dizimeiro and Peruaçu villages, served by the Sumaré BHU. These two villages completely lack basic sanitation. They are located in wetlands by the Peruaçu river, infested with snails of the Biomphalariagenus (data not shown).The area is considered endemic for S. mansonibecause of continued local transmission. Chronic forms of disease may present liver and spleen involvement and in some cases upper digestive bleeding secondary to the rupture of esophageal varices. Therefore, actions for the control of schistosomiasis endemicare strongly desirable in this area. 

Hookworm eggs were detected in 75 children, most of them (53.3%) living in Sumaré. The area presentsfavorable environment for the maintenance of infective larval forms, such as humidity, luminosity and sandy soil [19]. 

Low prevalence of Ascaris lumbricoidesand Trichuristrichiurawas observed. As opposed to our study, high prevalence of both parasites has been described in other indigenous populations[6,20]. The synergism between the two species could be explained by the similaritiesof their life cycles, the high production of eggs and their capacity to survive adverse environmental conditions. Low prevalence of helminthes has also been observed by other authors [21] and could be explained by frequent mass treatment withanti-parasiticdrugs in all the DILX. The low prevalence for Strongiloydesstercoralisand EnterobiusvermicularisinXakriabáchildren could be explained by limitations of the coproscopic method used in this study. Stool samples are immersed in conservative solution in the TF-test method, which may destroy the larvae of S. stercoralis. On the other hand, anal swab examination would be the most appropriate method to detect E. vermicularis, according to the biological behavior of the parasite [7]. 

Positivity in the parasitological survey did not show significant difference between boys and girls in the DILX. Similar results were reported in children under 13 in ethnic groups from the Amazonia region[22].As opposed to the children, prevalence is usually higher in teenager boys, mainly for schistosomiasis. It isusually explained by the differences in behavior. Teenager boys are usually in contact with the environment more often than girls and younger children, who tend to stay near the house[23]. 

Infection with multiple parasiteshasnegative consequences to the general health, including malnutrition and anemia (5,21).Multiple parasite infectionin the DILX was restricted to protozoa species, and may be attributed to poorsanitation. Nonetheless, considerable improvement had been implemented years before this survey. The National Health Foundation (FUNASA) isin charge of the health care of indigenous populations since the year 2000. Actions were taken to improve sanitation, including the building of sanitary modules, tubular wells, the distribution of filters for drinking water, to list a few, that benefitted at least 1000 people. In 2002, the government started the program for the surveillance of quality of water, SISAGUA (Information System on Water for Human Supply). The program improved the quality of water in the DILX. Currently, nearlyall houses receive treated running water, except for the villages in the critical area near Peruaçu river. Theimprovements mentioned above could also be responsible for the low prevalence of helminthes in the DILX. But the high prevalence of protozoa infections indicates that building interventions alone are not sufficient to control protozoa infections. 

In order to examine associations between parasitic diseases and potential demographic, housing and environmental factors, a random intercept Poisson model with robust variance was employed to take into account the dependence of individuals between villages. One of the major assumptions of the tests of significance used in the multilevel models is normality of the error distributions involved. Another assumption is the sufficient number of sample size for the higher-level variables. A potential limitation for using the multi-level model approach is that the localities studied are not a random sample of a number of villages. However, random intercept and random coefficient models are a flexible and powerful tool to tackle the effect of clustering in multi-level data [24] and it has been suggested that a size of 30 in each level (in our case village-level), provide accurate standard error estimates for the regression coefficients of the fixed part of the multilevel model [25]. 

In addition to the loss of 30% of indigenous participation, the main limitation of the present study is the restriction to estimate the prevalence of S. stercoralisand E. vermicularis, because of the parasitological method employed. TF-Test is not recommended for detection of those parasites. The use of combined methods such as Baermann&Moraes or Rugai for S. stercoralis, and anal swab for E. vermiculariswould have allowedto estimate the prevalence of these parasites [7].In addition, the use of a quantitative method such as Kato-Katz [6] for positive samples would allowto estimate theparasite burden, important to evaluate the sanitation programs implemented by FUNASA. Yet, the use of the TF-test method was important because it is more sensitive to detect cysticforms of protozoa, commonly underestimated by quantitative or sedimentation methods. 

The variationsobserved in prevalence between the BHU could be explained by differences in adherence to study protocol. On average, adherence was 71%. No significant difference in the proportion of participants was observed between the BHU.

5.      Conclusion 

The present data point to the continuing poor sanitation conditions in the DILX despite recent improvements, resulting not only in high levels of parasitism, but also in the frequent occurrence of multiple parasite infections. It demonstrates the urgent needtocomplete thebuilding of the sanitation system and to implement consistent actions of basic education for health. Isolated measures tend to prove unsuccessful as demonstrated in the DILX, where high prevalence of water borne protozoa infections are still observed. 

6.      Sponsorships: 

The studyhas been supported by CNPq, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico [305999/2014-1; 202334/2011-2], and FAPEMIG, Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais [PPM-00154-12]. 

7.      Acknowledgements: 

The authors would like to acknowledge Mr Marco Antônio Ferreira Pedrosa of the Gorceix Foundation for his help in map design, MrVanderleiEustáquio Machado and DrRoney Luiz de Carvalho Nicolato for help in laboratory analysis and the staff of DSEI/SESAI in São João das Missões for their logistic support during the field study.





Figure 1: Geographic location and the basic healthcare units’ coverage in the Xakriabá indigenous land in the north of Minas Gerais state, Brazil.






Figure 2: Distribution of parasites in the basic healthcare units’ coverage in the Xakriabá indigenous land in the north of Minas Gerais state, Brazil.


Group of

parasites

Result

Basic health unit

Total

N=2106 (%)

P value

 

 

Brejo Mata Fome

N=773 (%)

Itapicuru

N=424 (%)

Sumaré

N=559 (%)

Pindaíba

N=137 (%)

Rancharia

N=213 (%)

General

Positive

354 (45.8)

242 (57.1)

309 (55.3)

61 (44.5)

100(46.9)

1066(50.6)

< 0.001

Pathogenic protozoa

Negative

536 (69.3)

262 (61.8)

369 (66.0)

94 (68.6)

159 (74.6)

1420 (67.4)

0.001

Mono parasitism

203 (26.3)

145 (34.2)

180 (32.2)

41 (29.9)

53 (24.9)

622 (29.5)

Poliparasitism

34 (4.4)

17 (4.0)

10 (1.8)

2 (1.5)

1 (0.5)

64 (3.0)

Helminths

Negative

731 (94.6)

400 (94.3)

487 (87.1)

131 (95.6)

196 (92.0)

1945 (92.4)

< 0.001

Mono parasitism

41 (5.3)

24 (5.7)

63 (11.3)

6 (4.4)

17 (8.0)

151 (7.2)

Poliparasitism

1 (0.1)

0 (0.0)

9 (1.6)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

10 (0.5)

                   
 

Table 1: Prevalence of pathogenic protozoa and helminths in children under 13, according to basic health unit in the Xakriabá indigenous land, São João das Missões, Minas Gerais state, Brazil.

 

 

Age group (years)

 

Parasite

<1a

1-5a

6-9b

10-12b

Total

N=142

N=821

N=727

N=416

N=2106

General parasites

12 (8.5)

392 (47.7)

410 (56.4)

252 (60.6)

1066 (50.6)

Entamoeba histolytica / E. dispar

1 (0.7)

98 (11.9)

163 (22.4)

91 (21.9)

353 (16.8)

Giardia duodenalis

7 (4.9)

181 (22.0)

136 (18.7)

73 (17.5)

397 (18.9)

Entamoeba coli

4 (2.8)

198 (24.1)

275 (37.8)

155 (37.3)

632 (30.0)

Iodamoebabutschlii

0 (0.0)

9 (1.1)

14 (1.9)

12 (2.9)

35 (1.7)

Endolimax nana

1 (0.7)

24 (2.9)

30 (4.1)

25 (6.0)

80 (3.8)

Taenia sp

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

2 (0.3)

1 (0.2)

3 (0.1)

Hymenolepis nana

0 (0.0)

17 (2.1)

18 (2.5)

10 (2.4)

45 (2.1)

Schistosoma mansoni

0 (0.0)

3 (0.4)

4 (0.6)

5 (1.2)

12 (0.6)

Ascaris lumbricoides

0 (0.0)

2 (0.2)

6 (0.8)

1 (0.2)

9 (0.4)

Trichuristrichuria

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

1 (0.1)

0 (0.0)

1 (0.05)

Hookworm

0 (0.0)

18 (2.2)

31 (4.3)

26 (6.3)

75 (3.6)

Strongiloydesstercoralis

0 (0.0)

3 (0.4)

5 (0.7)

0 (0.0)

8 (0.4)

Enterobiusvermicularis

0 (0.0)

3 (0.4)

13 (1.8)

6 (1.4)

22 (1.0)

a,b: the letters indicate the age groups merged for analysis

Table 2: Prevalence (%) of intestinal parasites by age group, in the Xakriabá indigenous land, São João das Missões, Minas Gerais state, Brazil.

 

 

Helminth

Protozoan

PRR*

95% LCI

95% UCI

p-value

PRR*

95% LCI

95% UCI

p-value

Sex

0.47

0.49

1.55

<0.001

1.02

0.89

1.17

0.767

Age group (6-12 years)

0.87

0.15

1.08

0.636

1.01

0.82

1.24

0.913

Mother schooling

0.40

0.56

2.07

0.072

0.74

0.64

0.86

<0.001

Agglomeration

 

 

 

 

1.03

0.77

1.39

0.831

Argillous soil

0.54

0.42

1.17

<0.001

0.93

0.83

1.05

0.233

Argillous and rocky soil

 

 

 

 

1.25

1.14

1.36

<0.001

Sanitary toilet in the peridomiciliary

 

 

 

 

0.87

0.79

0.95

0.002

Dirt floor

 

 

 

 

1.04

0.94

1.14

0.458

Dry sump in the household

0.70

0.96

2.15

0.169

1.07

0.73

1.57

0.716

Sanitary toilet in the peridomiciliary

1.43

0.97

1.00

0.08

1.00

0.82

1.22

0.994

% Households without sanitary toilet

0.98

0.97

1.00

0.015

0.98

0.95

1.03

0.255

*Prevalence Risk Ratios (PRR) and 95% confidence intervals are estimated with the use of a multivariate random intercept Poisson regression model with robust variance.

Table 3: Effect of potential risk factors on intestinal parasites among indigenous children under 13 years old in São João das Missões, Minas Gerais state, Brazil.

1.       Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics. (2016) Brasil.

2.       Pena JL, Heller L, Dias Junior CS(2009)The population Xakriabá, Minas Gerais: demographic, political, social and economic aspects. Rev bras study popul 26: 51-59.

3.       Pena JL, Heller L(2008)Sanitation and indigenous health: an evaluation in the population Xakriabá, Minas Gerais. EngSanit Ambient13: 63-72.

4.       Coelho V, Shankland A, (2011)Making the right to health a reality for Brazil’s indigenous peoples: innovation, decentralization and equity. MEDICC Rev 13: 50-53.

5.       Coimbra CEA, Santos RV, Welch JR, Cardoso AM, Souza MC, Garnelo L, et al. (2013)The first national survey of indigenous people’s health and nutrition in Brazil: rationale, methodology, and overview of results. BMC Public Health13: 52.

6.       Brandelli CLC, De Carli GA, Macedo AJ, Tasca T (2012). Intestinal parasitism and socio-environmental factors of Mbyá-Guarani Indians, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Rev Inst Med Trop S Paulo 54: 119-122.

7.       Carvalho GL, Moreira LE, Pena JL, Marinho CC, Bahia MT, et al. (2012) A comparative study of the TF-Test®, Kato-Katz, Hoffman-Pons-Janer, Willis and Baermann-Moraescoprologic methods for the detection of human parasitosis. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz107:80-84.

8.       de Onis M, Garza C, Onyango AW, Borghi E(2007) Comparison of the WHO child growth standards and the CDC 2000 growth charts. J Nutr 137: 144-148.

9.       World Health Organization (1995) Physical status: the use and the interpretation of anthropometry. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser854: 1-452.

10.    Barros AJD,Hirakata VN (2003)Alternatives for logistic regression in cross-sectional studies: an empirical comparison of models that directly estimate the prevalence ratio. BMC Med Res Methodol3: 21.

11.    Maas CJM, Hox JJ (2005) Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Methodology1: 86-92.

12.    Maldonado G,Greeland S(1993)Simulation study of confounder-selection strategies. Am J Epidemiol138: 923-936.

13.    Fuchs SC, Victora CG, Fachel J(1996) Hierarchical Model: a proposal for a model to be applied in the investigation of risk factors for severe diarrhea. Rev Saude Publica 30: 168-178.

14.    Teixeira JC, Heller L, Barreto ML(2007)Giardia duodenalisinfection: risk factors for children living in sub-standard settlements in Brazil. Cad Saude Publica 23: 1489-1493.

15.    Strina A, Cairncross S, Barreto ML, Larrea C, Prado MS(2003)Childhood diarrhea and observed hygiene behavior in Salvador, Brazil. Am Journal of Epidemiol157: 1032-1038.

16.    Utzinger J, N’Goran EK, Marti HP, Tanner M, Lengeler C (1999) Intestinal amoebiasis, giardiasis and geohelminthiases: their association with other intestinal parasites and reported intestinal symptoms. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg93: 137-141.

17.    Zani LC, Favre TC, Pieri OS, Barbosa CS(2004) Impact of antihelminthictreatment on infection by Ascaris lumbricoides, Trichuristrichiura and hookworms in Covas, a rural community of Pernambuco, Brazil. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo 46: 63-71.

18.    Alves JR, Macedo HW, Ramos AN Jr, Ferreira LF, Gonçalves MLC, et al. (2003) Intestinal parasite infections in a semiarid area of Northeast Brazil: preliminary findings differ from expected prevalence rates. Cad Saude Publica 19: 667-670.

19.    Brooker S, Clements AC, Bundy DAP (2006)Global epidemiology, ecology and control of soil-transmitted helminth infections. Adv Parasitol 62: 221-261.

20.    Assis EM, Oliveira RC, Moreira LE, Pena JL, Rodrigues LC, et al. (2013) Prevalence of intestinal parasites in the Maxakali indigenous community in Minas Gerais, Brazil, 2009. Cad Saude Publica 29: 681-690.

21.    Ferreira H, Lala ERP, Monteiros MC, Raimondo ML(2006) An epidemiology study of the frequency and factors of risk of enteroparasitoses and their correlation with the nutritional state of children at pre-school age, intestinal parasitoses and infantile development. CienciaBiologia eSaude12: 33-40.

22.    Miranda RA, Xavier FB, Menezes RC (1998)Intestinal parasitism in a Parakanã indigenous community in southwestern Pará State, Brazil. Cad SaudePublica, 14: 507-511.

23.    Zuk M,McKean KA(1996) Sex differences in parasite infections: patterns and processes. Int J Parasitol26: 1009-1023.

24.    Localio AR, Berlin JA, Ten Have TR, Kimmel SE(2001)Adjustments for center in multicenter studies: an overview. Ann Intern Med 17: 112-123.

25.    Maas CJ,Hox JJ(2004) The influence of violations of assumptions on multilevel parameter estimates and their standard errors. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis46:427-440.

Citation: de Carvalho Siqueira GL,Bakolis I, Bahia MT, Marinho CC,de Paula Vieira E, et al.(2017) Prevalence of Intestinal Parasites Among Children 13-and-Under Residents in the Indigenous Land of Xakriabá, Brazil. Arch Epidemiol: AEPD -110. DOI: 10.29011/AEPD-110.000010