Article / Review Article

"TreatmentStrategies for Noncolorectal Nonendocrine Liver Metastasis (NCNELM)"

Luis César Bredt*

Departament of Surgery, Hepatobiliary Section, Cancer Hospital-UOPECCAN, Cascavel, Brazil

*Corresponding author:Luis César Bredt, Cancer Hospital - UOPECCAN,Surgical Oncology, Hepatobiliary Section, 696 Rua Itaquatiaras, Cascavel, Brazil. Tel: +554521017000 ; Email:lcbredt@gmail.com

Received Date:12December, 2018; Accepted Date:29 January, 2018; Published Date:05February, 2018

1.      Abstract 

The liver is one of the commonest sites for metastatic spread of tumors, particulary for those originating from the gastrointestinal tract. Treatment and outcome of liver metastases from colorectal and neuroendocrine tumors has been extensivily studied during the last decade, this is not the case for metastatic disease originating from others sites.The author discuss the emerging treatments strategies for NCNELM, including liver resection, and the potential benefits of such therapeutic modalities.

2.      Keywords:Noncolorectal; Nonendocrine; Resection; Therapy

1.      Introduction

The liver is one of the commonest sites for metastatic spread of tumors, particulary for those originating from the gastrointestinal tract. Autopsy studies have shown that in patients who die of malignant disease, hepatic metastases are found in up to 36% of cases, with the most frequent primaries being colon and rectum, bronchus, pancreas, breast, stomach and primary of unknow origin[1]. Almost half of patients who die of cancer of the stomach, pancreas or breast are found to have liver metastases[2]. Aproximatelly 40% of patients with endometrial tumours develop liver metastases[2]. Less commonly hepatic metastases can occur from soft tissue sarcomas, particularly visceral leiomyossarcomas[3].The prognosis of these untreated hepatic metastases is generally poor with the majority of patients sucumbing to their disease within 12 months from the time of diagnosis[4].

 While the evolution, treatment and outcome of liver metastases from colorectal and neuroendocrine tumors has been extensivily studied during the last decade, this is not the case for metastatic disease originating from others sites (organs).Now, as more patientsare detected at an earlier stage of their disease due to improvements in imaging techniques and screening, eventually agressive oncological and surgical therapies may provide long term survival for selected patients, therefore, liver resections for NCNELM are gaining popularity[5]. 

2.      Investigation Modalities 

The aim of a thorough preoperative work-up and routine follow-up after treatment of a primary tumour isto identify eventual liver metastases as early as possible in order to select patients who might benefit from further surgery or systemictherapyand exclude those for whom suchtreatment might not be helpful. 

4.1. Serum Markers 

The specificity of each serum marker varies according to the primary tumor(Table 1). Independently to the primary lesion, serum levels of Carcino-Embryonic Antigen (CEA), alkaline phosphatase, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), and, occasionally, alpha-fetoprotein may be increased in the presence of NCNELM[6]. 

4.2. Imaging Work Upand Tumoral Vascularization 

Following the detection of metastases an initial Computed Tomography (CT) scann, or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), in case of contraindication to CT scann, should be done. Sometimes, the ultrasound alone may be sufficient if it can provide the necessary information,particularly so when the Ultrasound(US)isassociated with contrast. If the ultrasound fails to yield the necessary information, the next evaluation modality should be MRI. This is prefered as it has a high sensitivity for these lesions. In case of hypervascular metastases, the CT scann or MRI must have an arterial phase (three phasic). Nodule characterization by MRI and contrast ultrasound is more efficient compared to CT scann. For the evaluation of intrahepatic extension of the NCNELM, CT scann and/or MRI are usefull techniques, depending on the case,aPositron Emission Tomography (PET)scann can be added if a surgical treatment is planned[14]. 

The correct caracterization of the tumoral vascularization is an essential element in the NCNELM investigation. The contrast ultrasound and the MRI allow the study of the vasculature of a tumor, and whatever the technique is used, there are hypervascular metastases and hypovascular metastases. Hypervascular are classically metastases of neuroendocrine and carcinoid tumors, kidney, breast, thyroid and sometimes lesions originating from sarcomas. On the other hand, metastatic lesions originating from a primary tumor of lung, prostate, bladder and pancreas are hypovascular[14](Table 2).  

3.      Chemotherapy for Metastatic Liver Disease According to Each Primary 

In contrast to the treatment of colorectal liver metastases where chemotherapy acts as an adjuvant treatment to surgery, the reverse situation is currently observed for noncolorectal nonendocrine liver metastases, where systemic chemotherapy plays the key role and surgery acts as an adjuvant therapy, and mainly, with the emergence of effective therapies for most tumors, the prognostic value of chemotherapy response is of major importance in the decision making process[15].

 5.1. Gastrointestinal Tumors 

In general adenocarcinoma of the esophagus is treated by analogy to gastric cancers. For metastatic squamous cell carcinoma, the combination of cisplatin and irinotecan is recommended due to its good tolerability and high response rate (overall response of 57% and complete response of 6%)[16].The use of oxaliplatin and capecitabine demonstrated in a study an objective response rate of 35%[17]. In patients with poor clinical condition, paclitaxel is suggested with overall response of about 15%[18].The use of molecular therapies have shown promising results, but is still considered experimental. Like adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, the gastroesophageal junction tumors are treated according to gastric tumor guidelines. Recent advances in the treatment of these tumors include the targeted therapies such as bevacizumab. The last one combined with irinotecan and cisplatin demonstrated response rates of 65% and median survival of 12.3 months[19]. Further studies of chemotherapy in combination with bevacizumab are ongoing. 

The spontaneous survival in cases with synchronous bilobar liver metastases from gastric cancer is 4 months and 7 to 8 months in the case of unilobar liver metastatic disease[20].A recent meta-analysis demonstrated a gain in overall survival in patients undergoing chemotherapy versus best supportive care for metastatic gastric cancer. This study established the superiority of combination regimens with cisplatin on 5-fluoracil (5-FU) monotherapy[21].On the other hand, hepatic metastases from gastric cancer are modestly sensitive to chemotherapy. The cisplatin and 5-FU regimen remains the most popular regimen in Europe and is still used as a control arm in several studies. A randomized study included oxaliplatin, capecitabine or epirubicin combined to cisplatin and 5-FU, with similar response rates among the regimens[22].Regimens containing irinotecan or docetaxel were also tested in randomized studies in patients with advanced disease and had variable results[23-26].The FOLFOX regimen showed objective response of 43% in first-line treatment, consistent with other first-line regimens[27].Like breast cancer, approximately 20% of gastric tumors show over expression of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER-2). A randomized study assessed the role of trastuzumab in first-line treatment for patients with HER-2 positive gastric cancer, and there was an increase in overall survival (13.8 vs 11.1 months, p = 0.0046) in favor of the trastuzumab arm[28]. 

More than half of patients diagnosed with tumors of the small intestine present with locally advanced or metastatic disease, including the liver. In the past, systemic treatments similar to those described for cancers of the stomach were used in cases of more proximal cancers, and similar treatment of colon cancer in cases of distal. However, the use of platinum combined with 5-FU appears to confer survival advantage to these patients[29]. A recent study evaluated the combination of capecitabine and oxaliplatin with objective response rate of 50%, time to progression of 11.3 months and median survival of 20.4 months[30]. 

5.2. Biliary-pancreatic Tumors 

In metastatic biliary tract cancer, the fluoropyrimidine-based regimens achieve response rates of 10% and median survival of approximately 6 months[31-33].The addition of platinum agents appears to increase the survival and response rates[34,35].A recent meta-analysis of 104 clinical trials[36] suggested differences in biological behavior of tumors of the biliary tract, with gallbladder carcinoma being more sensitive to systemic chemotherapy than cholangiocarcinoma (objective response of 36 vs 18%), but with a tendency to shorter median survival (7.2 vs 9.3 months). It was also demonstrated in this meta-analysis the superiority of gemcitabine-based regimens compared to other regimens, particularly in combination with platinum agents. The combination of gemcitabine and capecitabine also proved to be active, with response rates around 30%[37]. Overexpression of the receptor of epidermal growth factor receptorhas been observed in advanced tumors of the biliary tract, suggesting that the combination with cetuximab may increase effectiveness of chemotherapy. A study that evaluated the activity of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin in combination with cetuximab showed an objective response rate of 63%[38]. 

Hepatic metastases from pancreatic cancer are modestly sensitive to chemotherapy. The use of gemcitabine is associated with a low objective response with clinical benefit in only 24% of patients. A recent meta-analysis evaluating the combination of gemcitabine with other drugs has shown a benefit in progression-free survival and objective response with combination chemotherapies[39]. The addition of gemcitabine to biological agents (tipifarnib[40] and marimastate[41]) resulted in no benefit in overall survival compared with gemcitabine alone. One exception was a study which compared gemcitabine combined with erlotinib or placebo[42]. The combination arm demonstrated superiority in terms of overall survival (6.2 vs 5.9 months, p=0.038) and survival free progression (3.8 vs 3.5 months, p=0.004). Based on these data, erlotinib was approved for the treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer. 

5.3. Breast Tumors

Patients with predominantly visceral metastases from breast cancer are sensitive to chemotherapy and prolonged remissions are obtained in about 50% of cases, however, isolated hepatic metastases from breast cancer are uncommon, therefore, the evaluation of the results is difficult to achieve. The recent advances include trastuzumab as first line treatment in combination with chemotherapy (paclitaxel or anthracyclines and cyclophosphamide) with increased response rates, progression-free survival and overall survival[43]. 

5.4. Reproductive System Tumors 

In metastatic uterine cancer (endometrial), response rates with progestins correlated with tumor grade and to the state of the progesterone receptor (37% vs 8% when no expression)[44]. For patients with aggressive behavior disease, such as hepatic metastases, combined chemotherapy is recommended with agents such as doxorubicin, cisplatin and paclitaxel[45].The most active cytostatic agents in metastatic ovarian cancer consist of cisplatin, carboplatin and paclitaxel, and the most widely used alkylating agent is cyclophosphamide. The number of cycles depends on the stage of disease and on the antitumor response obtained. Drugs such as docetaxel, gemcitabine, adriamycin and 5-FU are active to a lesser extent[46]. 

5.5. Urologic Tumors 

In metastatic bladder cancer, a randomized study showed that the combination of carboplatin and gemcitabine has efficacy similar to M-VAC regimenin terms of overall and survival at five years[47,48], and the regimes containing carboplatin/gemcitabine/paclitaxel are equally active in metastatic disease[49].The use of interleukin-2 (IL-2) in high doses for metastatic renal cancer showed complete response of 9.3%, partial response of 9.7% and overall response of 19%[50,51]. The combination ofIL-2 and interferon (IFN) shows similar response rates[52]. Recently, targeted therapies with sunitinib[53] or temsirolimus[54]can be recommended as the first line treatment. The treatment of metastatic prostate cancer is complex taking into account patient’s age, prostate-specific antigen values and tumor aggressiveness (Gleason score). Essentially the prostate cancer is a hormone sensitive tumor, androgen-dependent, and the treatment initially consists of hormone therapy by surgical castration or drugs. When the disease becomes hormone-resistant, the chemotherapy can be indicated[55]. In metastatic disease of testicle tumors the treatment necessarily involves bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatine schemes. Despite the higher myelotoxicity, the scheme with etoposide, ifosfamide and cisplatinhas the same efficacy in metastases response[56,57]. 

5.6. Sarcoma and Stromal Tumors

 Today, the chemotherapeutic treatment for sarcomas is based on the histological type. Liposarcomashave increased sensitivity to anthracyclines[58,59] and have a high response rate to trabectedin-based treatments[60,61]. Leiomyosarcomas respond well to combinations of gemcitabine with docetaxel[62-65] and to trabectedin[66].The most active drug in the treatment of synovial sarcoma is ifosfamide[67] and targeted therapies with pazopanib and sunitinib have been tested for metastatic disease[68].Angiosarcomas are highly responsive to taxanes isolated[69,70] or in combination with other drugs,such as docetaxel and gemcitabine[71]. Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans appears to be responsive to Imatinib,with an objective response rate of 36%[72]. Metastases from gastrointestinal stromal primary tumors have a high objective response rate (over 50%) to imatinib, up to 70% of responding tumors remain in remission up to 3 years post treatment[73]. The relevance of the initial dose of imatinib in patients with advanced disease was evaluated in several studies[74,75], with an increased progression-free survival with no difference in overall survival with higher doses of imatinib. 

5.7. Melanoma 

Chemotherapy agents with activity in melanoma, with overall response between 10% and 20%, include dacarbazine, temozolomide, carmustine, lomustine, vinblastine, and taxanes, but the response rate of hepatic metastases, particularly in uveal melanoma, is less than 5%[76]. Non-respondingpatients (to chemotherapy) may respond to IFN or high doses of IL-2[77].Studies involving combined biological agents to standard chemotherapy show an overall response of 40-60% and complete response of 10-30%[78,79]. A study showed significant increase in response rate (48 versus 25%, p = 0.001), progression free interval (4.9 versus 2.4 months, p = 0.008) and overall survival (11.9 versus 9.2 months, p = 0.06) in favor of patients treated with biochemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone[80]. Preliminary data from a study with chemotherapy with or without sorafenib, showed increased response rate (overall response of 24 vs 12%) and progression free interval (HR = 0.66) with the addition of sorafenib[81]. 

5.8. Head and Neck Tumors 

Randomized studies (conducted before the era of cetuximab) demonstrated that polychemotherapy had no benefit in overall survival compared to monochemotherapy in metastatic head and neck cancer despite higher response rates with combined regimens[82].The actual recommendation of adding cetuximab to chemotherapy in patients with stage IV is based on a randomized study that demonstrated that adding cetuximab had advantage in overall survival compared to chemotherapy alone (10.1 vs 7.4 months, p = 0.036)[83]. 

5.9. Lung Tumors 

Combined or isolated chemotherapy for non-small cell lung carcinoma in the metastatic context achieves an increase in survival[84], but the evaluation of the results in isolated hepatic metastases is difficult to achieve because liver-only dissemination occurs in about 5% of metastatic cases[85].The use of combined regimens has a lower toxicity, and these combinations include carboplatin/ paclitaxel/ cisplatin/ docetaxel/ gemcitabine and vinorelbine[84].Targeted therapies have also been evaluated, and the combination of chemotherapy with these agents, such as gefitinib, erlotinib and bevacizumab, have resulted in better response rates compared to chemotherapy alone[86]. 

4.      Liver Resection 

In practice, liver surgery for noncolorectal nonendocrine metastases should be considered only when the metastatic disease is well controlled or responding to systemic therapy, andthe efficacy of hepatic resection for patients with NCNELM can be noted by the outcomes observed in patients selected for hepatic resection, being better than those achieved with currently available nonsurgical therapies, suggesting that hepatic resection may provide an independent survival benefit[15].There are studies on this topic that, have suggested that hepatic resection for NCNELM is safe and approximately as effective as hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases, with reported 5-year survivals between 30% and 40%[85-93].A study carried out [15] determined that the overall survival following hepatic resection was 36% at 5 years and 23% at 10 years. The disease-free survivals at the same time points were 21% and 15%, respectively, with a median disease-free survival of 13 months.During posthepatectomy follow-up, recurrent liver metastases were identified in 49% of patients, these metastases were solely intrahepatic in 24% of patients and were associated with extrahepatic metastases in 25% of patients. From the group with only intrahepatic recurrences, 32% underwent a second hepatectomy. Initial extrahepatic metastases were surgically treated in 23%, and subsequent recurrences were surgically treated in 37%. Following first hepatectomy, the 5-year and 10-year recurrence-free survivals were 14% and 10%, respectively, with a median recurrence-free survival of 11 months. 

In the same study[15]patients with liver metastases from primary breast tumors following hepatic resection experienced 5 and 10 - year survivals of 41% and 22%, respectively, with a median survival of 45 months, and patients with liver metastases that originated from gastrointestinal primary tumors experienced favorable to intermediate survivals following resection, including an overall 5 - year survival of 31% and a median survival of26 months. However, within the gastrointestinal category, some groups experienced relatively better survivals (ie, small bowel tumors had a 5 - year survival of 49%), whereas other sites experienced poor outcomes (ie, gastroesophageal junction 5-year survival, 12%). Metastases from urologic primary tumors were associated with a 5-year survival of 48% and a median survival of 51 months. In descending order, adrenal, testicular, and renal metastases were associated with 5-year survivals of 66%, 51%, and 38%, respectively. For melanomas, including choroid melanoma and cutaneous melanoma, the 5-year survivals for each of these melanoma types were 21% and 22%, respectively. Patients with gynecologic primary tumors were associated with a 5-year survival of 48%, however, the 5-year survival for patients with ovarian primary tumor sites (50%) exceeded that of patients with uterine primaries (35%). Patients with primary tumors of pancreatic or biliary origin experienced an intermediate 5-year survival of 27%, with only those patients with ampullary primary tumors had a favorable 5-year survival (46%). Patients with liver metastases from pancreatic primary tumors had a 5-year survival of 25%, and the subset with pancreatic adenocarcinoma had a 5-year survival of 20%. Patients with head, neck, and pulmonary primary tumors with squamous cell histology experienced poor outcomes following hepatic resection with 5-year survivals less than 15%. Tumors of unknown origin were associated with a 5-year survival of 38%(Table 3). 

The operative risk of hepatic resection has diminished even as the indications have expanded, given the progressive increase over time in the number of patients with noncolorectal nonendocrine liver metastases treated with resection. The surgical series and studies of NCNELM resection report rates of 0% to 3.6% of mortality with up to 33% of mobidity[15, 87-93].Resection may be considered in patients fit enough to tolerate general anaesthesia, with no major comorbidity and normal liver function. Absolute contraindications for resection of noncolorectal nonenndocrine liver metastases have not been clarified, but should not be offered resection to patients with uncontrolled primary disease or such widespread intrahepatic involvement that the residual liver function after resection would be inadequate. Most thatauthorities would agree that presently it would be safe to resect up to 70% of a healthy (non-cirrhotic) liver. Relative contraindications include situations where resection is not performed easily, such as caudate lobe involvement or tumours invading the inferior vena cava. Tumor involvement of the portal vein confluence would also limit the potential curability of the resection. Bilobar distribution of metastases or size of metastases are relative contraindications and do not necessarily limit resectability. 

5.      Liver Transplantation 

Unlike liver metastases from endocrine or carcinoid tumors, liver metastases from noncolorectal and nonendocrine cancer are not good indications for Liver Transplantation (LT). A concensus conferenceabout the indications of liver transplantation concludes that the place of the LT in dealing with malignant tumors other than HCC is uncertain because of multiplicity of etiologies, heterogeneity on staging and there isa methodological insuficiency data available[94]. The results of LT for metastases from colorectal cancer, pancreatic endocrine tumors, peripheral cholangiocarcinoma contraindicate such indications. A customary survival at 5 years of 50% allows us to perform the transplantation in rare patients with hepatoblastoma, hemangioendothelioma epithelioid or metastases of carcinoid tumor.               

6.      Radiofrequency Ablation 

The Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) is a relatively recent techinque in the treatment of the most common malignant liver tumors such as hepatocellular carcinoma and colorectal metastases. In a serie oftreatment by RFA of NCNELMofonly breast cancer origin[95], agreat concern was the incidence of continuous and adjacent tumor recurrence after the ablation according to the size of the lesions treated, mainly lesions with diameter >4 cm.Another serie described the using of laparoscopic RFA of liver tumors, and according to the resultsthe liver recurrence rate per tumor was highest for colorectal metastasis (34%), followed by noncolorecta lnonneuroendocrine metastasis (22%)[96].The results of intraoperative RFA of liver tumorsin addition to resection were published [97], the group of patients with metastases noncolorectal (comprised 20% of endocrine tumors) had a median survival significantly higher than the metastatic colorectal group, respectively 59 months and 37.3 months. The overall survival was negatively influenced by lesions superior of3 cm in diameter.Factors to be considered in the indication of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation, or combined surgery are the diameter of the lesions, the presence of extrahepatic disease and sensitivity to medical treatment. A less aggressive disease with a tumor progression-free interval exceeding 24 months maybe a factor that encourage agressive local treatments[98,99].

7.      Chemoembolisation 

The chemoembolization is a therapeutic modality that can be used in association with percutaneous ablation techniques, surgical resection or chemotherapy. Whereas there is no reported serie with improved survival in patients with NCNELM treated by chemoembolization, it is in the majority of cases well tolerated and can induce a durable response, especially in hypervascular metastases. The tumor regression in patients iniatilly considered as non-resectable can allows secondary resection. The main branch portal thrombosis is a classical contraindication to chemoembolization, although hyperselctive chemoembolization decreases the risk of parenchymal necrosis, and a severe hepatic insufficiencymay decompensate after chemoembolization[100]. 

8.      Final Considerations

The variety of the clinical situations in NCNELM scenario, like primary tumor site and histology, disease-free interval before hepaticprogression, metastases response to chemotherapy, and the presence of extrahepatic disease makes the decision process very complex, but agressive treatment strategies, like liver resection in selected patients, maybe promising. Therefore, it is critical that treatment decisions for patients with NCNELM should be made by multidisciplinary treatment groups in attempt to achieve better survival outcomes[101].


Gastric cancer [7]

Ampullary cancer [8]

Breast cancer [9,10]

Ovarian cancer [11,12]

Uveal melanoma [13]

ACE

 

 

 

LDH

Ca 19-9

ACE

ACE

Ca 125

Alkaline phosphatase

Ca 72-4

Ca 19-9

AST

ACE

-GT

 

Table 1:  Predictive serum markers for detection of hepatic metastasis according to each primary.

 

 

Hypervascular metastases

Hypovascular metastases

Hypovascular or hypervascular metastases

Neuroendocrine

 

 

Kidney

Bladder

Pancreas (70% hypovascular)

Thyroid

Lung

Breast (70% hypervascular)

Sarcomas

Prostate

 

Melanoma

 

 

 

Table 2: Vascularization of hepatic metastases from noncolorectal nonendocrine tumors on imaging study [14].

 

Primary tumor

No

5- year survival %

Median survival (mo)

All patients

1452

36

35

Group 1 : 5-yr survival >30%

Adrenal

28

66

63

Testicular

78

51

82

Ovarian

65

50

98

Small bowel

28

49

58

Ampullary

15

46

38

Breast

454

41

45

Unknown

28

38

30

Renal

85

38

36

Uterine

43

35

32

Group 2 : 5-yr survival 15-30%

Gastric adenocarcinoma

64

27

15

Exocrine pancreatic

40

25

20

Cutaneous melanoma

44

22

27

Choroid melanoma

104

21

19

Duodenal

12

21

34

Group 3 : 5-yr survival <15%

Gastroesophageal junction

25

12

14

Pulmonary

32

8

16

Esophageal

20

32*

16

Head and neck

15

24*

18

*Three-year survival.

 

Table 3: Five-year and median survivals for patients with NCNELM from individual primary tumor sites grouped by Favorable (Group 1), Intermediate (Group 2), and Poor outcomes (Group 3)[15].

1.       Willis RA (1973) The spread of tumours in the human body. London : Butterwworths 1973.

2.       Pickren JW, Tsukada Y, Lane WW (1982) Liver metastasis: analysis of autopsy data. In : Weiss L, Gilbert HA, (eds) Liver metastasis. Boston : GK Hall medical Publishers 1982:219-302.

3.       Jaques DP, Coit DG, Ctissueasper ES, Brennan MF (1995) Hepatic metastases from soft tissue sarcoma. Ann Surg221:392-397.

4.       Bengtsson I, Carlsson G, Hafstrom L, Jönsson PE (1981) Natural history of ptients with untreated liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Am J Surg141:586-589.

5.       Clarke NA, Kanhere HA, Trochsler MI, Maddern GJ (2016) Liver resection for non-colorectal non-neuroendocrine metastases. ANZ J Surg 2016.

6.       Huguier M and Lacaine F (1981) Hepatic metastases in gastrointestinal cancer-diagnostic value of biochemical investigations. Arch Surg  116:399-401.

7.       Chice L, Ducreux M, Lbreton G, et al. (2005) Metastases hepatiques des cancers du tube digestif en dehors du colon et du rectum. In : Chirurgie des metastases hetpatiques des cancers non colo-rectaux non endocrines. Adam R, Chice L (eds.), Paris, Arnette2005: 48.

8.       Todoroki T, Koike N, Morishita Y, Kawamoto T, Ohkohchi N, et al. (2003) Patterns and predictors of failure after curative resections of carcinoma of the ampulla of vater. Ann Surg Oncol10 :1176-1183.

9.       Wyld L, Gutteridge E, Pinder SE, James JJ, Chan SY, et al. (2003) Prognostic factors for patients with hepatic metastases from breast cancer. Br J Cancer89:284-290.

10.    O Reilly SM, Richards MA, Rubens RD (1990) Liver metastases from breast cancer: the relationship between clinical, biochemical and pathological features and survival. Eur J Cancer26:574-577.

11.    Sonnendecker EW, de Souza JJ, Herman AA (1984) Screening for liver metastases from ovarian cancer with seerum carcinoembryonic antigen and radionuclide hepatic scintiphotography. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 91:187-192.

12.    Aravantinos D, Michalas S, Papazefkos V, Christoforaki M, Stypsaneli A, et al. (1990) Predictive values of CA 125 antigen levels and CT scan in second-look procedures for ovarian cancer. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 37:265-270.

13.    Kaiserman I, Amer R, Peer J (2004) Liver function tests in metstatic uveal melanoma. Am J Ophthalmol137:236-243.

14.    Kunstlinger F (2005) Imagerie des Métastases hpatiques des cancers non colo-rectaux. In Adam R, Chiche L (eds.) Chirurgie des métastases hépatiques de cancers non colo-rectaux non endocrines. Paris, Arnette 2005:20-36.

15.    Adam R, Chiche L, Aloia T, Elias D, Salmon R, et al.(2006) Hepatic Resection for Noncolorectal NonendocrineLiver MetastasesAnalysis of 1452 Patients and Development of a Prognostic Model. Ann Surg244:524-532.

16.    Ilson DH, Saltz L, Enzinger P, Huang Y, Kornblith A, et al. (1999) Phase II trial of weekly irinotecan plus cisplatin in advanced esophageal cancer. J Clin Oncol17:3270.

17.    Jatoi A, Murphy BR, Foster NR, Nikcevich DA, Alberts SR, et al. (2006) North Central Cancer Treatment Group. Oxaliplatin and capecitabine in patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, gastroesophageal junction and gastric cardia: a phase II study from the North Central Cancer Treatment Group. Ann Oncol 17: 29.

18.    Ilson DH, Wadleigh RG, Leichman LP, Kelsen DP (2007) Paclitaxel given by a weekly 1-h infusion in advanced esophageal cancer. Ann Oncol18:898.

19.    Shah MA, Ramanathan RK, Ilson DH, Levnor A, D'Adamo D, et al. (2006) Multicenter phase II study of irinotecan, cisplatin, and bevacizumab in patients with metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol 24: 5201.

20.    Kunieda K, Saji S, Sugiyama Y, Osada S, Sano J, et al. (2002) Evaluation of treatment for synchronous hepatic metastases from gastric cancer with special refference to long-term survivors. Surg Today 32: 587-593.

21.    Wagner AD, Grothe W, Haerting J, Kleber G, Grothey A, et al. (2006) Chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on aggregate data. J Clin Oncol 24:2903.

22.    Cunningham D, Starling N, Rao S, Iveson T, Nicolson M, et al. (2008) Upper Gastrointestinal Clinical Studies Group of the National Cancer Research Institute of the United Kingdom. Capecitabine and oxaliplatin for advanced esophagogastric cancer. N Engl J Med 358: 36.

23.    Pozzo C, Barone C, Szanto J, Padi E, Peschel C, et al. (2004) Irinotecan in combination with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid or with cisplatin in patients with advanced gastric or esophageal-gastric junction adenocarcinoma: results of a randomized phase II study. Ann Oncol 15: 1773.

24.    Dank M, Zaluski J, Barone C, Valvere V, Yalcin S, et al. (2008) Randomized phase III study comparing irinotecan combined with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid to cisplatin combined with 5-fluorouracil in chemotherapy naive patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the stomach or esophagogastric junction. Ann Oncol 19: 1450.

25.    Park SH, Nam E, Park J, Cho, Shin DB, et al. (2008) Randomized phase II study of irinotecan, leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil (ILF) versus cisplatin plus ILF (PILF) combination chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer. Ann Oncol 19: 729.

26.    Van Cutsem E, Moiseyenko VM, Tjulandin S, Majlis A, Constenla M, et al. (2006) Phase III study of docetaxel and cisplatin plus fluorouracil compared with cisplatin and fluorouracil as first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer: a report of the V325 Study Group. J Clin Oncol 24:4991.

27.    Cavanna L, Artioli F, Codignola C, Lazzaro A, Rizzi A, et al. (2006) Oxaliplatin in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) in patients with metastatic gastric cancer (MGC). Am J Clin Oncol 29: 371.

28.    Bang YJ, Van Cutsem E, Feyereislova A, Chung HC, Shen L, et al. (2010) Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (ToGA): a phase 3, open-label, randomized controlled trial. Lancet 376: 687-697.

29.    Locher C, Malka D, Boige V, Lebray P, Elias D, et al. (2005) Combination chemotherapy in advanced small bowel adenocarcinoma. Oncology 69: 290.

30.    Overman MJ, Varadhachary GR, Kopetz S, Adinin R, Lin E, et al. (2009) Phase II study of capecitabine and oxaliplatin for advanced adenocarcinoma of the small bowel and ampulla of Vater. J Clin Oncol 27: 2598.

31.    Glimelius B, Hoffman K, Sjödén PO, Jacobsson G, Sellström H, et al. (1996) Chemotherapy improves survival and quality of life in advanced pancreatic and biliary cancer. Ann Oncol 7: 593.

32.    Choi CW, Choi IK, Seo JH, Kim BS, Kim JS, et al. (2000) Effects of 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in the treatment of pancreatic-biliary tract adenocarcinomas. Am J Clin Oncol 23: 425.

33.    Hezel AF and Zhu AX (2008) Systemic therapy for biliary tract cancers. Oncologist 13: 415.

34.    Kim TW, Chang HM, Kang HJ, Lee JR, Ryu MH, et al. (2003) Phase II study of capecitabine plus cisplatin as first-line chemotherapy in advanced biliary cancer. Ann Oncol 14: 1115.

35.    Hong YS, Lee J, Lee SC, Hwang IG, Choi SH, et al. (2007) Phase II study of capecitabine and cisplatin in previously untreated advanced biliary tract cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 60: 321.

36.    Eckel F and Schmid RM (2007) Chemotherapy in advanced biliary tract carcinoma: a pooled analysis of clinical trials. Br J Cancer 96: 896.

37.    Knox JJ, Hedley D, Oza A, Feld R, Siu LL, et al. (2005) Combining gemcitabine and capecitabine in patients with advanced biliary cancer: a phase II trial. J Clin Oncol 23: 2332.

38.    Gruenberger B, Schueller J, Heubrandtner U, Wrba F, Tamandl D, et al. (2010) Cetuximab, gencitabine, and oxiliplatin in patients with unresectable advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer: a phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol 11: 1142-1148.

39.    Sultana A, Tudur Smith C, Cunningham D, Starling N, Neoptolemos JP, et al. (2008) Meta-analyses of chemotherapy for locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer: results of secondary end points analyses. Br J Cancer 99: 6.

40.    Van Cutsem E, van de Velde H, Karasek P, Oettle H, Vervenne WL, et al. (2004) Phase III trial of gemcitabine plus tipifarnib compared with gemcitabine plus placebo in advanced pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol 22: 1430.

41.    Bramhall SR, Schulz J, Nemunaitis J, Brown PD, Baillet M, et al. (2002) A double-blind placebo-controlled, randomised study comparing gemcitabine and marimastat with gemcitabine and placebo as first line therapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer 87: 161.

42.    Moore MJ, Goldstein D, Hamm J, Figer A, Hecht JR, et al. (2007) National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials GroupErlotinib plus gemcitabine compared with gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase III trial of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. J Clin Oncol 25: 1960.

43.    Slamon DJ, Leyland-Jones B, Shak S, Fuchs H, Paton V, et al. (2001) Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2. N Engl J Med 344: 783.

44.    Thigpen JT, Brady MF, Alvarez RD, Adelson MD, Homesley HD, et al. (1999) Oral medroxyprogesterone acetate in the treatment of advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma: a dose-response study by the Gynecologic Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol 17: 1736-1744.

45.    Moxley KM and McMeekin DS (2010) Endometrial carcinoma: a review of chemotherapy, drug resistance, and the search for new agents. Oncologist 15: 1026-1033.

46.    Adam R, Morice P, Machover D (2005) Métastases hépatiques des cancers des cancers gynécologiques. In: Chirurgie des métastases hépatiques des cancers non colo-rectaux non-endocrines. Adam R, Chice L (eds.), Paris, Arnette 2005:148.

47.    von der Maase H, Hansen SW, Roberts JT, Dogliotti L, Oliver T, et al. (2000) Gemcitabine and cisplatin versus methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin in advanced or metastatic bladder cancer: results of a large, randomized, multinational, multicenter, phase III study. J Clin Oncol 18: 3068.

48.    von der Maase H, Sengelov L, Roberts JT, Ricci S, Dogliotti L, et al. (2005) Long-term survival results of a randomized trial comparing gemcitabine plus cisplatin, with methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, plus cisplatin in patients with bladder cancer. J Clin Oncol 23: 4602.

49.    Hussain M, Vaishampayan U, Du W, Redman B, Smith DC (2001) Combination paclitaxel, carboplatin, and gemcitabine is an active treatment for advanced urothelial cancer. J Clin Oncol 19: 2527.

50.    Rosenberg SA, Yang JC, White DE, Steinberg SM (1998) Durability of complete responses in patients with metastatic cancer treated with high-dose interleukin-2: identification of the antigens mediating response. Ann Surg 228: 307.

51.    Yang JC, Sherry RM, Steinberg SM, Topalian SL, Schwartzentruber DJ, et al. (2003) Randomized study of high-dose and low-dose interleukin-2 in patients with metastatic renal cancer. J Clin Oncol 21: 3127.

52.    McDermott DF, Regan MM, Clark JI, Flaherty LE, Weiss GR, et al. (2005) Randomized phase III trial of high-dose interleukin-2 versus subcutaneous interleukin-2 and interferon in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 23: 133.

53.    Motzer RJ, Hutson TE, Tomczak P, Michaelson MD, Bukowski RM, et al. (2007) Sunitinib versus interferon alfa in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 356: 115.

54.    Hudes G, Carducci M, Tomczak P, Dutcher J, Figlin R, et al. (2007) Global ARCC Trial.Temsirolimus, interferon alfa, or both for advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 356: 2271.

55.    Chiche L, Joly F, Comoz F(2005) Métastases hépatiques des cancers des cancers urologiques. In: Chirurgie des métastases hépatiques des cancers non colo-rectaux non endocrines. Adam R, Chice L (eds.), Paris, Arnette 2005: 174.

56.    Nichols CR, Catalano PJ, Crawford ED, Vogelzang NJ, Einhorn LH, et al. (1998) Randomized comparison of cisplatin and etoposide and either bleomycin or ifosfamide in treatment of advanced disseminated germ cell tumors: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, Southwest Oncology Group, and Cancer and Leukemia Group B Study. J Clin Oncol 16: 1287.

57.    Hinton S, Catalano PJ, Einhorn LH, Nichols CR, David Crawford E, et al. (2003) Cisplatin, etoposide and either bleomycin or ifosfamide in the treatment of disseminated germ cell tumors: final analysis of an intergroup trial. Cancer 97: 1869.

58.    Patel SR, Burgess MA, Plager C, Papadopoulos NE, Linke KA, et al. (1994) Myxoid liposarcoma. Experience with chemotherapy. Cancer 74: 1265.

59.    Jones RL, Fisher C, Al-Muderis O, Judson IR (2005) Differential sensitivity of liposarcoma subtypes to chemotherapy. Eur J Cancer 41: 2853.

60.    Garcia-Carbonero R, Supko JG, Maki RG, Manola J, Ryan DP, et al. (2005) Ecteinascidin-743 (ET-743) for chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas: multicenter phase II and pharmacokinetic study. J Clin Oncol 23: 5484.

61.    Demetri GD, Chawla SP, von Mehren M, Ritch P, Baker LH, et al. (2009) Efficacy and safety of trabectedin in patients with advanced or metastatic liposarcoma or leiomyosarcoma after failure of prior anthracyclines and ifosfamide: results of a randomized phase II study of two different schedules. J Clin Oncol 27: 4188-4196.

62.    Hensley ML, Maki R, Venkatraman E, Geller G, Lovegren M, et al. (2002) Gemcitabine and docetaxel in patients with unresectable leiomyosarcoma: results of a phase II trial. J Clin Oncol 20: 2824-2831.

63.    Leu KM, Ostruszka LJ, Shewach D, Zalupski M, Sondak V, et al. (2004) Laboratory and clinical evidence of synergistic cytotoxicity of sequential treatment with gemcitabine followed by docetaxel in the treatment of sarcoma. J Clin Oncol 22: 1706.

64.    Bay JO, Ray-Coquard I, Fayette J, Leyvraz S, Cherix S, et al. (2006) Groupe Sarcome Français. Docetaxel and gemcitabine combination in 133 advanced soft-tissue sarcomas: a retrospective analysis. Int J Cancer 119: 706.

65.    Hensley ML, Blessing JA, Mannel R, Rose PG (2008) Fixed-dose rate gemcitabine plus docetaxel as first-line therapy for metastatic uterine leiomyosarcoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group phase II trial. Gynecol Oncol 109: 329.

66.    Demetri GD, Chawla SP, von Mehren M, Ritch P, Baker LH, et al. (2009) Efficacy and safety of trabectedin in patients with advanced or metastatic liposarcoma or leiomyosarcoma after failure of prior anthracyclines and ifosfamide: results of a randomized phase II study of two different schedules. J Clin Oncol 27: 4188.

67.    Spillane AJ, A'Hern R, Judson IR, Fisher C, Thomas JM (2000) Synovial sarcoma: a clinicopathologic, staging, and prognostic assessment. J Clin Oncol 18: 3794.

68.    George S, Merriam P, Maki RG, Van den Abbeele AD, Yap JT, et al. (2009) Multicenter phase II trial of sunitinib in the treatment of nongastrointestinal stromal tumor sarcomas. J Clin Oncol 27: 3154.

69.    Fata F, O'Reilly E, Ilson D, Pfister D, Leffel D, et al. (1999) Paclitaxel in the treatment of patients with angiosarcoma of the scalp or face. Cancer 86: 2034.

70.    Nagano T, Yamada Y, Ikeda T, Kanki H, Kamo T, et al. (2007) Docetaxel: a therapeutic option in the treatment of cutaneous angiosarcoma: report of 9 patients. Cancer 110: 648.

71.    Penel N, Lansiaux A, Adenis A (2007) Angiosarcomas and taxanes. Curr Treat Options Oncol 8: 428-434.

72.    Rutkowski P, Van Glabbeke M, Rankin CJ, Ruka W, Rubin BP, et al. (2010) Imatinib mesylate in advanced dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: pooled analysis of two phase II clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 28: 1772-1779.

73.    Demetri GD, von Mehren M, Blanke CD, Van den Abbeele AD, Eisenberg B, et al. (2002) Efficacy and safety of imatinib mesylate in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors. N Engl J Med 347: 472.

74.    Verweij J, Casali PG, Zalcberg J, LeCesne A, Reichardt P, et al. (2004) Progression-free survival in gastrointestinal stromal tumours with high-dose imatinib: randomised trial. Lancet 364: 1127.

75.    Blanke CD, Rankin C, Demetri GD, Ryan CW, von Mehren M, et al. (2008) Phase III randomized, intergroup trial assessing imatinib mesylate at two dose levels in patients with unresectable or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors expressing the kit receptor tyrosine kinase: S0033. J Clin Oncol 26: 626.

76.    Buzaid AC (2000) Strategies for combining chemotherapy and biotherapy in melanoma. Cancer Control 7: 185.

77.    Buzaid AC (2004) Management of metastatic cutaneous melanoma. Oncology 18: 1443.

78.    Laporte M, Trakatelli M, Vereecken P, Blocklet D, Lespagnard M, et al. (2007) Skin biopsies in DC vaccines for stage III-IV melanoma patients: role of neutrophils? Arch Dermatol Res 299: 303.

79.    Hess V, Herrmann R, Veelken H, Schwabe M (2007) Interleukin-2-based biochemotherapy for patients with stage IV melanoma: long-term survivors outside a clinical trial setting. Oncology 73: 33.

80.    Eton O, Legha SS, Bedikian AY, Lee JJ, Buzaid AC, et al. (2002) Sequential biochemotherapy versus chemotherapy for metastatic melanoma: results from a phase III randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 20: 2045.

81.    McDermott DF, Sosman JA, Gonzalez R, Hodi FS, Linette GP, et al. (2008) Double-blind randomized phase II study of the combination of sorafenib and dacarbazine in patients with advanced melanoma: a report from the 11715 Study Group. J Clin Oncol 26: 2178.

82.    al-Sarraf M (1994) Cisplatin combinations in the treatment of head and neck cancer. Semin Oncol 21: 28-34.

83.    Vermorken JB, Mesia R, Remenar E, Rivera F, Kawecki A, et al. (2008) Platinum-base chemotherapy plus cetuximab in head and neck cancer. N Engl J Med 359: 1116-1127.

84.    Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Collaborative Group (2010) Chemotherapy and supportive care versus supportive care alone for advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev12: CD007309.

85.    Harrison LE, Brennan MF, Newman E, Fortner JG, Picardo A, et al. (1997) Hepatic resection for noncolorectal, nonneuroendocrine metastases: a fifteen-year experience with ninety-six patients. Surgery 121: 625-632.

86.    Zalcman G, Bergot E, Lechapt E (2010) Update on nonsmall cell lung cancer. Eur Respir Rev 2010: 173-185.

87.    Harrison LE, Brennan MF, Newman E, Fortner JG, Picardo A, et al. (1997) Hepatic resection for noncolorectal, nonneuroendocrine metastases: a fifteen-year experience with ninety-six patients. Surgery 121: 625- 632.

88.    Laurent C, Rullier E, Feyler A, Masson B, Saric J (2001) Resection of noncolorectal and nonneuroendocrine liver metastases: late metastases are the only chance of cure. World J Sur 25: 1532-1536.

89.    Weitz J, Blumgart LH, Fong Y, Jarnagin WR, D'Angelica M, et al. (2005) Partial hepatectomy for metastases from noncolorectal, nonneuroendocrine carcinoma. Ann Surg 241: 269-276.

90.    Ercolani G, Grazi GL, Ravaioli M, Ramacciato G, Cescon M, et al. (2005) The role of liver resections for noncolorectal, nonneuroendocrine metastases: experience with 142 observed cases. Ann Surg Oncol 2005 ; 12: 459-466.

91.    Adam R, Aloia T, Krissat J, Bralet MP, Paule B, et al. (2006) Is Liver Resection Justified for Patients With Hepatic Metastases From Breast Cancer? Ann Surg 244: 897-908.

92.    Earle SA, Perez EA, Gutierrez JC, Sleeman D, Livingstone AS, et al. (2006) Hepatectomy enables prolonged survival in select patients with isolated noncolorectal liver metastasis. J Am Coll Surg 203: 436-446.

93.    Bresadola V, Rossetto A, Adani GL, Baccarani U, Lorenzin D, et al. (2011) Liver resection for noncolorectal and nonneuroendocrine metastases: results of a study on 56 patients at a single institution. Tumori 97: 316-322.

94.    Conférence de concensus - Indications de la transplantation hépatique. Lyon : aute Autorité de Santé 2005.

95.    Livraghi T, Goldberg SN, Solbiati L, Meloni F, Ierace T, et al. (2001) Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of liver metastases from breast cancer: initial experience in 24 patients. Radiology 220: 145-149.

96.    Berber E and Siperstein A (2008) Local recurrence after laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation of liver tumors: an analysis of 1032 tumors. Ann Surg Oncol 15: 2757-2764.

97.    Pawlik TM, Izzo F, Cohen DS, Morris JS, Curley SA (2003) Combined resection and radiofrequency ablation for advanced hepatic malignancies: results in 172 patients. Ann Surg oncol 10: 1059-1069.

98.    Laurent C, Rullier E, Feyler A, Masson B, Saric J (2001) Resection of noncolorectal and nonendocrine liver metastasees: late metastases are the only chance of cure. World J Surg 25: 1532-1536.

99.    Weitz J, Blumgart LH, Fong Y, Jarnagin WR, D'Angelica M, et al. (2005) Partial hepatectomy for metastases from noncolorectal, nonendocrine carcinoma. Ann Surg 241: 269-276.

100.De Baere TH, Bellin MF, Dahbi N (2005) Alternative à la chirurgie dans le traitment des métastases hépatiques de cancers non colorectaux nonendocrines. In: Chirurgie des métastases hépatiques des cancers non colo-rectaux non endocrines. Adam R, Chice L (eds.), Paris, Arnette 2005: 37-42.

101.Gandy RC, Bergamin PA, Haghighi KS (2017) Hepatic resection of non-colorectal non-endocrine liver metastases. ANZ J Surg 87: 810-814.

Citation:Bredt LC (2018) Treatment Strategies for Noncolorectal Nonendocrine Liver Metastasis (NCNELM). J Surg:JSUR-195.DOI:10.29011/2575-9760. 000195