Journal of Diabetes and Treatment (ISSN: 2574-7568)

Article / editorial

"Metformin and its Potential for Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction"

Mohapradeep Mohan, Zaid Iskandar, Ify R Mordi, Casserene Yeow, Alex Neaogoie, Graham Rena, Samuel Chew, Chim C Lang*

Division of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, University of Dundee, UK

*Corresponding author: Chim C Lang, Division of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK. Tel: +44-1382383013; Fax: +44-1382383259; Email: c.c.lang@dundee.ac.uk

Received Date: 03 August, 2019; Accepted Date: 22 August, 2019; Published Date: 26 August, 2019


Introduction

The health burden of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF) is substantial. In some countries, HFpEF is the leading cause of hospital admission in patients over 65 years of age and is predicted to be the leading cause of mortality within a decade [1,2]. HFpEF is characterised by reduced exercise capacity and ability to engage in activities of daily living, poor Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL), high rates of hospitalisation, and premature mortality [3]. In sharp contrast to the wealth of proven therapies for Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF) that have improved mortality and morbidity, there is a distinct lack of treatment options for HFpEF. Drugs or devices which are recommended in current HF treatment guidelines to improve outcomes in HFrEF have not been shown to have similar benefit in HFpEF patients, and to date, phase III randomised controlled trials have not consistently yielded evidence-based therapy for HFpEF [4]. The lack of treatment options in patients with HFpEF represents a significant unmet need that urgently demand new therapeutic strategies that arguably target mechanisms specific for HFpEF.

Targeting co-morbidities in HFpEF

A key feature of HFpEF patients is the presence of several comorbidities, including obesity, diabetes and hypertension, that contribute not only to the aetiology of HFpEF but also to the progression of the disease in HFpEF [5-7]. A new paradigm on the relationship between comorbidities and the development of HFpEF has been proposed [8]. This hypothesised that the high prevalence of comorbidities in HFpEF synergistically induces a systemic pro-inflammatory state, leading to coronary microvascular and generalized endothelial inflammation, which in turn results in abnormalities in ventricular and vascular function ultimately leading to increased Left Ventricular Hypertrophy (LVH), diastolic dysfunction due to LV stiffness and consequent HFpEF development. Indeed, patients with HFpEF have evidence of inflammation not only in the myocardium but also in lungs, skeletal muscles, and kidneys that contributes to pulmonary hypertension, exercise intolerance, and renal impairment in HFpEF [9,10]. In the BIOSTAT study, we recently confirmed the importance of inflammation in HFpEF patients in a network analysis of 92 biomarkers in patients with HFpEF [11]. These observations support the notion that targeting comorbidities and the consequent systemic microcirculatory dysfunction may be a strategic approach in addressing the unmet therapeutic needs of HFpEF [12].

Obesity, metabolic syndrome, insulin resistance, diabetes and HFpEF

There are several lines of evidence strongly suggesting that obesity and diabetes contributes to the risk of developing and worsening HFpEF [13]. Obesity is highly prevalent (50%) in HFpEF patients [12]. In patients with HFpEF, Body Mass Index (BMI) is strongly associated with New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class and a predictor of poor outcome [14,15]. It is likely that obesity is more than just a co-morbidity for HFpEF and instead may be involved in its pathogenesis. Obesity has been identified as a risk factor for HFpEF [16,17]. Increased adiposity promotes hypertension, systemic inflammation and insulin resistance, all of which are commonly observed in patients with HFpEF [18]. Obesity also impairs cardiac, vascular, and skeletal muscle function [19]. Adipose tissue is metabolically active and produces cardiovascular active substances such as inflammatory cytokines and adipokines. In addition, increased visceral adiposity on multi-slice imaging has been shown to be associated with a higher risk of HFpEF events [20].

With respect to diabetes and HFpEF, there is evidence suggesting that there are two distinct Heart Failure (HF) phenotypes associated with diabetic cardiomyopathy. The first is of Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) that leads to HFrEF with a dilated left ventricular phenotype and the second is of Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) associated with obesity that leads to a HFpEF phenotype with concentric remodelling of the Left Ventricle (LV) [21]. Seferović and Paulus recently presented evidence attributing the aetiology of the two phenotypes to the differential principal involvement of either microvascular endothelial cells (HFpEF) or cardiac myocytes (HFrEF) in the remodelling process [22]. In post-hoc analyses of both the I-PRESERVE trial as well as in CHARM-Preserved, HFpEF patients with T2D had more fluid congestion and worse quality of life and prognosis [23,24]. Thus, obesity and diabetes are not only risk factors for the development of HFpEF but also have a significant impact on its symptoms and outcome. Obesity and T2D (or diabesity) are therefore attractive potential therapeutic targets in HFpEF. Supportive evidence that obesity contributes to exercise intolerance in HFpEF through systemic inflammation has come from a 20-week caloric restriction diet in obese HFpEF that demonstrated an improvement in peak VO2 that strongly correlated with reduced body fat mass and hs-CRP, a biomarker of inflammation [25].

Targeting Obesity in HFpEF

Recognising the importance of comorbidities (that include obesity and insulin resistance), our collaborator, CSL and key investigators in the field have proposed six plausible mechanisms of potential translational significance: 3 haemodynamic mechanisms (left atrial hypertension, pulmonary hypertension, and volume overload) and 3 cellular/molecular mechanisms (microvascular inflammation, cardio-metabolic abnormalities, and cellular/extracellular structural changes) [3]. The first three haemodynamic mechanisms (left atrial hypertension, pulmonary hypertension, and volume overload) are currently being targeted with devices (interatrial septal device) and drugs in on going trials with endothelin antagonists, guanylate cyclase modulators, ARNI (in the PARAGON study) and SGLT2 inhibitors (EMPEROR-PRESERVED) [3,26] Of note, inter-atrial septal device intervention that reduces Pulmonary Capillary Wedge Pressure (PCWP) was shown to be safe and potentially beneficial at 1-year although its impact on hard outcomes remains unclear [27,28]. We also recognise the intense interest around SGLT2 inhibitors in HFpEF with at least 2 multi-centre international trials exploring this, EMPEROR-PRESERVED (with empagliflozin) and PRESERVED-HF (with dapagliflozin). However, we believe that there is a need to explore other potential therapeutic interventions. In this respect, the diabetic drug, metformin, may have potential in the setting of HFpEF.

Metformin and Its Potential in HFpEF

There are plausible reasons why metformin may be useful in HFpEF (Figure 1). Systemic inflammation is a key pathophysiological process in many of the comorbidities associated with HFpEF. There is evidence that metformin may have anti-inflammatory effects. In a translational study, we have shown that metformin inhibited tumour necrosis factor-α–dependent IκB degradation and the expression of pro-inflammatory mediators’ interleukin-6, interleukin-1β, and CXCL1/2 in primary hepatocytes of healthy animals [29]. These in-vitro findings were validated in a large population cohort study of treatment naïve T2D patients and also in a subset of non-diabetic HF patients from a double blind randomized controlled trial [29]. Second, metformin has the potential to regress the adverse ventricular remodelling in non-diabetic patients with coronary artery disease as observed in the MET-REMODEL trial, a consistent finding with preclinical evidence [30]. Third, metformin’s ability to reduce weight is a consideration for its potential therapeutic benefits in HFpEF. In the MET-REMODEL trial, metformin reduced weight (by 4 kg), a consistent finding with metformin use [30] . This reduction in weight could be beneficial in HFpEF. Fourth, metformin can also reduce blood pressure that could also potentially benefit HFpEF. Fifth, a recent study reported that metformin offers therapeutic benefit in mice models with HFpEF–like phenotype by reducing LV diastolic stiffness, an effect explained by metformin induced reduction in titin-based passive stiffness [31]. Finally, metformin has also been shown to improve pulmonary hypertension related to HFpEF, at least in animal models [32,33]. Although metformin has not been examined in patients with HFpEF, It is noteworthy that in patients with HFrEF and insulin resistance, metformin improved the VE/VCO2 slope in patients with HFrEF and insulin resistance [34]. In that study, there was also a non-statistical marginal reduction of NTproBNP in the metformin arm.

Taking into account all of the above therapeutic benefits observed in clinical and preclinical studies, it is clear that there is a need to explore the magnitude of the pleotropic effects of metformin, particularly in patients with HFpEF. Future studies exploring the beneficial effects of metformin in HFpEF patients are warranted (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03629340).


Figure 1: Plausible reasons why Metformin may be useful in HFpEF.


References

  1. Lam CS, Donal E, Kraigher-Krainer E, Vasan RS (2011) Epidemiology and clinical course of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Eur J Heart Fail 13: 18-28.
  2. Owan TE, Hodge DO, Herges RM, Jacobsen SJ, Roger VL, et al. (2006) Trends in prevalence and outcome of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. N Engl J Med 355: 251-259.
  3. Lam CSP, Voors AA, de Boer RA, Solomon SD, van Veldhuisen DJ (2018) Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: from mechanisms to therapies. European heart journal 39: 2780-2792.
  4. Zheng SL, Chan FT, Nabeebaccus AA, Shah AM, McDonagh T, et al. (2018) Drug treatment effects on outcomes in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart 104: 407-415.
  5. Lam CS, Lyass A, Kraigher-Krainer E, Massaro JM, Lee DS, et al. (2011) Cardiac dysfunction and noncardiac dysfunction as precursors of heart failure with reduced and preserved ejection fraction in the community. Circulation 124: 24-30.
  6. Maurer MS, Mancini D (2014) HFpEF: is splitting into distinct phenotypes by comorbidities the pathway forward? J Am Coll Cardiol 64: 550-552.
  7. Shah SJ, Kitzman DW, Borlaug BA, van Heerebeek L, Zile MR, et al. (2016) Phenotype-Specific Treatment of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Multiorgan Roadmap. Circulation 134: 73-90.
  8. Paulus WJ, Tschope C (2013) A novel paradigm for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: comorbidities drive myocardial dysfunction and remodeling through coronary microvascular endothelial inflammation. J Am Coll Cardiol 62: 263-271.
  9. Farrero M, Blanco I, Batlle M, Santiago E, Cardona M, et al. (2014) Pulmonary hypertension is related to peripheral endothelial dysfunction in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Circ Heart Fail 7: 791-798.
  10. Lim SL, Lam CS, Segers VF, Brutsaert DL, De Keulenaer GW (2015) Cardiac endothelium-myocyte interaction: clinical opportunities for new heart failure therapies regardless of ejection fraction. European heart journal 36: 2050-2060.
  11. Tromp J, Westenbrink BD, Ouwerkerk W, van Veldhuisen DJ, Samani NJ, et al. (2018) Identifying Pathophysiological Mechanisms in Heart Failure With Reduced Versus Preserved Ejection Fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol 72: 1081-1090.
  12. Triposkiadis F, Giamouzis G, Parissis J, Starling RC, Boudoulas H, et al. (2016) Reframing the association and significance of co-morbidities in heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail 18: 744-758.
  13. Gong FF, Jelinek MV, Castro JM, Coller JM, McGrady M, et al. (2018) Risk factors for incident heart failure with preserved or reduced ejection fraction, and valvular heart failure, in a community-based cohort. Open Heart 5: e000782.
  14. Haass M, Kitzman DW, Anand IS, Miller A, Zile MR, et al. (2011) Body mass index and adverse cardiovascular outcomes in heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction: results from the Irbesartan in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (I-PRESERVE) trial. Circ Heart Fail 4: 324-331.
  15. Dalos D, Mascherbauer J, Zotter-Tufaro C, Duca F, Kammerlander AA, et al. (2016) Functional Status, Pulmonary Artery Pressure, and Clinical Outcomes in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol 68: 189-199.
  16. Borlaug BA (2014) The pathophysiology of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Nat Rev Cardiol 11: 507-515.
  17. Melenovsky V, Borlaug BA, Rosen B, Hay I, Ferruci L, et al. (2007) Cardiovascular features of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction versus nonfailing hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy in the urban Baltimore community: the role of atrial remodeling/dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol 49: 198-207.
  18. von Bibra H, Paulus W, St John Sutton M (2016) Cardiometabolic Syndrome and Increased Risk of Heart Failure. Curr Heart Fail Rep 13: 219-229.
  19. Kitzman DW, Shah SJ (2016) The HFpEF Obesity Phenotype: The Elephant in the Room. J Am Coll Cardiol 68: 200-203.
  20. Rao VN, Zhao D, Allison MA, Guallar E, Sharma K, et al. (2018) Adiposity and Incident Heart Failure and its Subtypes: MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis). JACC Heart Fail 6: 999-1007.
  21. McHugh K, DeVore AD, Wu J, Matsouaka RA, Fonarow GC, et al. (2019) Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction and Diabetes: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. J Am Coll Cardiol 73: 602-611.
  22. Seferovic PM, Paulus WJ (2015) Clinical diabetic cardiomyopathy: a two-faced disease with restrictive and dilated phenotypes. European heart journal 36: 1718-1727.
  23. Kao DP, Lewsey JD, Anand IS, Massie BM, Zile MR, et al. (2015) Characterization of subgroups of heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction with possible implications for prognosis and treatment response. Eur J Heart Fail 17: 925-935.
  24. Kristensen SL, Mogensen UM, Jhund PS, Petrie MC, Preiss D, et al. (2017) Clinical and Echocardiographic Characteristics and Cardiovascular Outcomes According to Diabetes Status in Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Report From the I-Preserve Trial (Irbesartan in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction). Circulation 135: 724-735.
  25. Kitzman DW, Brubaker P, Morgan T, Haykowsky M, Hundley G, et al. (2016) Effect of Caloric Restriction or Aerobic Exercise Training on Peak Oxygen Consumption and Quality of Life in Obese Older Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Randomized Clinical Trial 315: 36-46.
  26. Hasenfuss G, Hayward C, Burkhoff D, Silvestry FE, McKenzie S, et al. (2016) A transcatheter intracardiac shunt device for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (REDUCE LAP-HF): a multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 1 trial. Lancet 387: 1298-1304.
  27. Shah SJ, Feldman T, Ricciardi MJ, Kahwash R, Lilly S, et al. (2018) One-Year Safety and Clinical Outcomes of a Transcatheter Interatrial Shunt Device for the Treatment of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction in the Reduce Elevated Left Atrial Pressure in Patients With Heart Failure (REDUCE LAP-HF I) Trial: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Cardiol 3: 968-977.
  28. Feldman T, Mauri L, Kahwash R, Litwin S, Ricciardi MJ, et al. (2018) Transcatheter Interatrial Shunt Device for the Treatment of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (REDUCE LAP-HF I [Reduce Elevated Left Atrial Pressure in Patients With Heart Failure]): A Phase 2, Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial. Circulation 137: 364-375.
  29. Cameron AR, Morrison VL, Levin D, Mohan M, Forteath C, et al. (2016) Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Metformin Irrespective of Diabetes Status. Circ Res 119: 652-665.
  30. Mohan M, Al-Talabany S, McKinnie A, Mordi IR, Singh JSS, et al. (2019) A randomized controlled trial of metformin on left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with coronary artery disease without diabetes: the MET-REMODEL trial. European heart journal.
  31. Slater RE, Strom JG, Methawasin M, Liss M, Gotthardt M, et al. (2019) Metformin improves diastolic function in an HFpEF-like mouse model by increasing titin compliance. J Gen Physiol 151: 42-52.
  32. Lai YC, Tabima DM, Dube JJ, Hughan KS, Vanderpool RR, et al. (2016) SIRT3-AMP-Activated Protein Kinase Activation by Nitrite and Metformin Improves Hyperglycemia and Normalizes Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction. Circulation 133: 717-731.
  33. Goncharov DA, Goncharova EA, Tofovic SP, Hu J, Baust JJ, et al. (2018) Metformin Therapy for Pulmonary Hypertension Associated with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction versus Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 198: 681-684.
  34. Wong AK, Symon R, AlZadjali MA, Ang DS, Ogston S, et al. (2012) The effect of metformin on insulin resistance and exercise parameters in patients with heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail 14: 1303-1310.

Citation: Mohan M, Iskandar Z, Mordi IR, Yeow C, Neaogoie A, et al. (2019) Metformin and its Potential for Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction. J Diabetes Treat 4: 1071. DOI: 10.29011/2574-7568.001071

free instagram followers instagram takipçi hilesi